Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume 3, Issue 8, 1 August 1999, Pages 301-310
Journal home page for Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Review
Visually timed action: time-out for ‘tau’?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01352-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Bringing about desirable collisions (making interceptions) and avoiding unwanted collisions are critically important sensorimotor skills, which appear to require us to estimate the time remaining before collision occurs (time-to-collision). Until recently the theoretical approach to understanding time-to-collision estimation has been dominated by the tau-hypothesis, which has its origins in J.J. Gibson’s ecological approach to perception. The hypothesis proposes that a quantity (tau), present in the visual stimulus, provides the necessary time-to-collision information. Empirical results and formal analyses have now accumulated to demonstrate conclusively that the tau-hypothesis is false. This article describes an alternative approach that is based on recent data showing that the information used in judging time-to-collision is task- and situation-dependent, is of many different origins (of which tau is just one) and is influenced by the information-processing constraints of the nervous system.

Section snippets

Why the τ-hypothesis is false

Reasons for rejecting the τ-hypothesis derive from direct experimental tests and logical arguments based on empirical observations. To address the latter first: τ is limited as a source of TTC information by four factors: (1) it neglects accelerations; (2) it provides information about TTC with the eye; (3) it requires that an object be spherically symmetric; (4) it requires that the object’s image size and expansion rate be suprathreshold23, 24. These factors seriously restrict the utility of

What has been learned?

The theoretical problems with τ prompted a search for other sources of TTC information that could avoid them: this search was undertaken by Lee34 and others19, 20, 24, 26. The first systematic attempt to solve the problems with τ was made by Tresilian19 who showed that accurate TTC information was available for use in bypass approaches (see Box 2); that methods are available for overcoming the problem with irregularly shaped rotating objects (if the object is rotating sufficiently fast,

Replacing the τ-hypothesis

The picture of TTC perception that emerges from the work reviewed in the previous section is a complex one. A variety of perceptual variables can influence TTC perception and the influence of a given variable is task dependent: one task might use one set of variables and another task a completely different set. A theory like the τ-hypothesis, which attempts to account for all TTC judgments in the same way is untenable. At the opposite extreme is the view that no theory is possible, merely a

Using information to control a response

Not only do different tasks involve different sources of information but the way in which the information is used in the control of the response is likely to differ between tasks and to change with experience and practice. A body of evidence – behavioural61, 62, neurological62 and neuroanatomical62, 63 – supports the idea that there are at least two functional streams of visual information processing within primate (including human) neocortex62, 63. These streams appear to support different

Conclusions

This article has reviewed recent work that shows conclusively that the hypothesis which proposes the variable τ as the informational basis for TTC estimation is false. Instead, it is clear that τ is a component of a more complex picture and it may or may not contribute to performance in a particular task. A new framework for understanding TTC perception, very different from the Gibsonian τ-hypothesis, is outlined here. This framework is based, firstly, upon results that demonstrate that many

Outstanding questions

  • How do the requirements for temporal accuracy vary between tasks and what perceptual quantities are available to provide the timing information necessary to explain observed levels of performance? How do these requirements constrain the selection and integration of TTC related information? What other factors affect selection and integration?

  • Exactly what sources of TTC information in addition to τ can the nervous system detect and how are they detected? Some suggestions have been proposed and

Acknowledgements

My thanks to James Cutting, Guy Wallis and two anonymous referees for helpful comment on previous versions of the manuscript. Preparation of this manuscript was supported by the Australian Research Council.

References (66)

  • R.J. Bootsma

    On the information-based regulation of movement: what Wann (1996) may want to consider

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1997)
  • F. Hoyle

    The Black Cloud

    (1957)
  • D.N. Lee

    A theory of the visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision

    Perception

    (1976)
  • D.N. Lee

    Visuo-motor coordination in space-time

  • M.T. Turvey et al.

    The ecological approach to perceiving-acting

    Acta Psychol.

    (1986)
  • D.N. Lee et al.

    Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics

    Nature

    (1981)
  • D.N. Lee

    Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball

    Q. J. Exp. Psychol.

    (1983)
  • H. Wagner

    Flow field variables trigger landing in flies

    Nature

    (1982)
  • M.N.O. Davies et al.

    Optic flow field variables trigger landing in hawks but not in pigeons

    Naturwissenschaften

    (1990)
  • G.J.P. Savelsbergh et al.

    Grasping tau

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1991)
  • G.J.P. Savelsbergh

    The visual guidance of catching

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1993)
  • M.K. Kaiser et al.

    Optical specification of time to passage: observers’ sensitivity to global tau

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1993)
  • D. Regan et al.

    Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and rate of angular expansion

    Vis. Res.

    (1993)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Time to collision is signalled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeons

    Nature

    (1992)
  • H.J. Sun et al.

    Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • F. Lacquaniti et al.

    The role of vision in tuning anticipatory motor responses of the limbs

  • J.R. Tresilian

    Four questions of time-to-contact: an analysis of research in interceptive timing

    Perception

    (1993)
  • J.P. Wann

    Anticipating arrival: is the tau-margin a specious theory?

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1996)
  • D. Regan et al.

    Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage

    Vis. Res.

    (1979)
  • R. Gray et al.

    Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information

    Vis. Res.

    (1998)
  • C. Von Hofsten

    Catching skills in infancy

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1983)
  • R.J. Bootsma et al.

    Visual information about time to collision between two objects

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1993)
  • P.R. DeLucia

    Pictorial and motion based information for depth perception

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (189)

    • Expecting pain

      2023, Synthese
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text