Research reportLesions of the basal forebrain impair reversal learning but not shifting of attentional set in rats
Introduction
There is a substantial body of evidence to suggest the basal forebrain, and specifically the cholinergic projection from the basal forebrain, is involved in attention in a variety of contexts [12], [23], [28]. However, not all aspects of attention are impaired following basal forebrain lesions. For example, marmosets with N-methyl-d-aspartate lesions of the basal forebrain were able to attend selectively to relevant dimensions of complex, multi-dimensional stimuli associated with reward and to switch their attention when a different aspect of the stimulus became associated with reward. The lesion did, however, result in a deficit in reversal learning [27].
The contribution of the basal forebrain cholinergic and non-cholinergic neurons in attention and in learning and memory was examined by Page et al. [24] who compared directly lesions of the basal forebrain made with different excitotoxins resulting in different degrees of cholinergic depletions. The authors concluded that impairments in learning and memory were not due to loss of the cortical cholinergic projections from the basal forebrain, but rather due to damage within the basal forebrain itself. By contrast, attentional deficits were due to the compromised cholinergic projections.
The role of the basal forebrain cholinergic system in reversal learning and attentional set-shifting is still debatable, however. Cabrera et al. [5] have recently shown that 192-IgG-saporin lesions of basal forebrain impaired reversal learning in rats. However, in marmosets, selective lesions of the cholinergic basal forebrain with ME20.4 IgG-saporin did not impair reversal learning except when lesioned animals were further challenged with the muscarinic antagonist, scopolamine [13]. Although scopolamine-induced deficits in both reversal learning and attentional set-shifting have been reported in rats [7], the authors suggest the locus of this effect may be outside the prefrontal cortex. It is possible to dissociate the behavioural consequences of basal forebrain cholinergic versus non-cholinergic damage by comparing lesions made with 192-IgG-saporin with ibotenic acid-induced lesions (non-selective, but results in less cholinergic damage than other excitotoxins [11]). When directly compared, the performance deficits of 192-IgG-saporin lesioned rats were interpreted as impaired vigilance, whereas ibotenic acid lesions impaired switching between response patterns [4].
The task used to test the formation and shifting of attentional set in monkeys has been adapted for rats [2], [21]. In this study, therefore, we compared the effects of selective cholinergic (192-IgG-saporin) lesions and non-selective excitotoxic (ibotenic acid) lesions of the basal forebrain on the ability to form and shift attentional set and the ability to acquire and reverse stimulus-response associations in rats.
Section snippets
Material and methods
Forty-nine male Lister hooded rats (half from Charles River, UK and half from Harlan Olac, UK), naïve to behavioural testing, were used. The rats were pair-housed until surgery and maintained in a colony on a 12 h light/dark schedule (lights on at 7 am), with a diet of 15–20 g of standard laboratory chow each day with water freely available in the home cage. The weight range at the time of surgery was 330–470 g. At sacrifice, the weight range was 350–520 g. All procedures were carried out in
Histology
Rats administered 192-IgG-saporin was found to have a loss of VAChT-positive (i.e., cholinergic) neurons of the nucleus basalis magnocellularis/substantia innominata (mean 77 ± 2%; range 60–83% (n = 12)) compared to controls (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). In some subjects, this neuronal loss extended into the horizontal limb of the diagonal band of Broca and the magnocellular preoptic nucleus, most clearly seen closest to the site of infusion (stereotaxic co-ordinates, AP −0.6 through to −2.1 where the
Discussion
Ibotenic acid lesions of the basal forebrain, which resulted in a non-selective loss of basal forebrain neurons (including a 47% decrease in cholinergic neurons of the nucleus basalis magnocellularis) impaired discrimination reversal learning and interfered with the formation of an attentional set. However, selective lesions of the basal forebrain cholinergic neurons with 192-IgG-saporin, did not result in impairments of discrimination learning, reversal learning or the formation or shifting of
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. J. McGaughy for advice and assistance performing the 192-IgG-saporin lesions. We also acknowledge Mrs. M. Latimer for histological support.
References (31)
- et al.
Both random and perseverative errors underlie WCST deficits in prefrontal patients
Neuropsychologia
(2002) - et al.
Dissociation between the attentional functions mediated via basal forebrain cholinergic and GABAergic neurons
Neuroscience
(2001) - et al.
Learning impairments following injection of a selective cholinergic immunotoxin, ME20.4 IgG-saporin, into the basal nucleus of Meynert in monkeys
Neuroscience
(1997) - et al.
Selective lesion of cholinergic neurons in the medial septum by 192 IgG-saporin impairs learning in a delayed matching to position T-maze paradigm
Brain Res
(2002) - et al.
More learned irrelevance than perseveration errors in rule shifting in healthy subjects
Brain Cogn
(2004) - et al.
Evidence for glutamate, in addition to acetylcholine and GABA, neurotransmitter synthesis in basal forebrain neurons projecting to the entorhinal cortex
Neuroscience
(2001) - et al.
Orbital prefrontal cortex mediates reversal learning and not attentional set shifting in the rat
Behav Brain Res
(2003) - et al.
Dissociable effects on spatial maze and passive avoidance acquisition and retention following AMPA- and ibotenic acid-induced excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain in rats: differential dependence on cholinergic neuronal loss
Neuroscience
(1991) - et al.
A specific form of cognitive rigidity following excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain in marmosets
Neuroscience
(1992) - et al.
Attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: what does it mean for learning and memory?
Neurobiol Learn Mem
(2003)
Differential effects of M1 muscarinic receptor blockade and nicotinic receptor blockade in the dorsomedial striatum on response reversal learning
Behav Brain Res
The behavioral functions of the cholinergic basal forebrain: lessons from 192-IgG-saporin
Int J Dev Neurosci
Cortical input to the basal forebrain
Neuroscience
Medial frontal cortex mediates perceptual attentional set shifting in the rat
J Neurosci
192 IgG-saporin: I. Specific lethality for cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain of the rat
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol
Cited by (61)
Bipolar disorder, mood stabilizers and cognitive flexibility: Translationally dissecting illness from drug effects
2022, Behavioural Brain ResearchAcetylcholine from the nucleus basalis magnocellularis facilitates the retrieval of well-established memory
2021, Neurobiology of Learning and MemoryValproic acid treated female Long-Evans rats are impaired on attentional set-shifting
2021, Behavioural Brain Research5-HT6 receptor agonist EMD386088 impairs behavioral flexibility and working memory
2018, Behavioural Brain ResearchAssessment of intradimensional/extradimensional attentional set-shifting in rats
2018, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews