Research report
Motor sequence learning in primate: Role of the D2 receptor in movement chunking during consolidation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Motor learning disturbances have been shown in diseases involving dopamine insufficiency such as Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenic patients under antipsychotic drug treatment. In non-human primates, motor learning deficits have also been observed following systemic administration of raclopride, a selective D2-receptor antagonist. These deficits were characterized by persistent fluctuations of performance from trial to trial, and were described as difficulties in consolidating movements following a learning period. Moreover, it has been suggested that these raclopride-induced fluctuations can result from impediments in grouping separate movements into one fluent sequence. In the present study, we explore the hypothesis that such fluctuations during movement consolidation can be prevented through the use of sumanirole – a highly selective D2 agonist – if administered before raclopride. Two monkeys were trained to execute a well known sequence of movements, which was later recalled under three pharmacological conditions: (1) no drug, (2) raclopride, and (3) sumanirole + raclopride. The same three pharmacological conditions were repeated with the two monkeys, trained this time to learn new sequences of movements. Results show that raclopride has no deleterious effect on the well known sequence, nor the sumanirole + raclopride co-administration. However, results on the new sequence to be learned revealed continuous fluctuations of performances in the raclopride condition, but not in the sumanirole + raclopride condition. These fluctuations occurred concurrently with a difficulty in merging separate movement components, known as a “chunking deficit”. D2 receptors seem therefore to be involved in the consolidation of new motor skills, and this might involve the chunking of separate movements into integrated motor sequences.

Introduction

Activities of daily living such as reaching and grasping an object, writing a letter, or playing golf, always involve sequences of movements grouped together that constitute complex actions. However, the functional and physiological processes underlying such combinations of isolated movements into smooth and coherent motor sequences remain poorly understood. The synergy and kinematic properties of the motor sequence are thought to be progressively learned through practice, until error-based readjustments become minimal [9]. The motor skill is then considered as optimally performed.

Two stages have been commonly identified in the learning process of a motor sequence: a first stage in which rapid improvement takes place within very few trials, and a second stage involving slower but progressive improvement from trial to trial, or from a testing session to another [17], [30]. Following this second stage, the motor skill is thought to be consolidated because its optimal performance remains stable, whatever the delay or the interference between each occurrence. This consolidated phase was found to be compromised following the anatomical or pharmacological disturbance of the central dopaminergic systems, in both humans and animals [2], [3], [16], [24], [27], [38]

Recently, Levesque et al. [22] described persistent fluctuations of motor performance in primates following the administration of raclopride, a selective dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) antagonist. Although these fluctuations were present throughout learning, they were more particularly evident during the late learning stages, for many weeks, when performances should have been stabilized. However, raclopride did not affect motor sequences that were already consolidated, that is stable before the administration of the drug. Qualitative analyses revealed that the raclopride-induced fluctuations occurred in concomitance with a specific difficulty monkeys had in grouping separate movements into integrated and fluent motor sequences [22].

Graybiel et al. [13] referred to the chunking hypothesis to explain the grouping of movements that takes place during motor sequence learning. This hypothesis, raised first by Miller [27] about episodic memory, may be summarized as the grouping of discrete items into meaningful or categorical chunks, in order to facilitate their retention. The view that such a functional mechanism is also involved in movement learning is concordant with results obtained in rats and primates showing cell activity in the striatum, involved in the re-organization of single movements into integrated sequences [2], [3], [16], [24].

Currently, there is no study showing the systematic induction and reversal of chunking disturbances during movement sequence learning. The present study aimed at further showing the Dopamine dependent mechanism in such a chunking process during motor learning. Two experiments have been conducted in primates for this purpose: one assessing the effects of a systemic injection of a D2R antagonist, and the second assessing the effects of an injection of D2R agonist prior to the D2R antagonist. According to previous studies [22], fluctuations of performance and chunking disturbances are expected with raclopride, especially during the late learning stage, that is during the consolidation process. In the present study, the pre-administration of sumanirole, a selective D2R agonist, is expected, however, to prevent such a raclopride-induced deleterious effect.

Section snippets

Animals

Two cebus apella monkeys (2–4 kg), J and L, were used. They were kept in individual cages with food available at all times. A water restriction routine was use to motivate the animals during training periods. Body weight and general health were monitored before and throughout the experiment. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC), and approved by both, the UQAM and “Université de Montréal” Animal Research Ethic Boards.

Drug protocol

Baseline data on the over-learned motor sequence

Raw data and filtered curves on the over-learned motor sequence are shown in Fig. 2a. The motor sequence appears to be consolidated in the last 500 trials, as the two monkeys show stable performances in comparison with the first 500 trials. In both monkeys, fluctuation score was significantly lower for the last 500 than the first 500 trials (monkey L (t = −21.05, P < 0.05); monkey J (t = −22.25, P < 0.05) see Fig. 2b).

New motor sequence learning

Learning profiles of new motor sequences under the three drug conditions are

Discussion

In the present study, D2R blockade with raclopride has induced performance fluctuations and chunking deficits during the consolidation of a new motor sequence, confirming our previous results [22]. In addition, we demonstrated here for the first time that these raclopride-induced deleterious effects are also reversible by the co-administration of sumanirole, a selective D2R agonist. More specifically, lower fluctuations scores and better chunking scores were observed in the two monkeys, when

Conclusion

Motor learning occurred in the present study, as revealed by the presence of a switch from stage 1 to stage 2 in every experimental condition. This clearly indicates a preserved learning capacity for new motor sequences, whether the monkeys were under the effects of raclopride, sumanirole or no drug. However, raclopride was found to delay the switch from stage 1 to stage 2, and to induce both persistent fluctuations (no consolidation) and a disturbed movement chunking process. These deleterious

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR), the ≪Fonds de la recherché en Santé du Québec≫ (FRSQ), and the Natural and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The sumanirole was gratefully provided by Pfizer Canada Inc.

References (47)

  • I. Willuhn et al.

    Motor-skill learning in a novel running-wheel task is dependent on D1 dopamine receptors in the striatum

    Neuroscience

    (2008)
  • K.R. Bailey et al.

    The role of striatum in initiation and execution of learned action sequences in rats

    J Neurosci

    (2006)
  • T.D. Barnes et al.

    Activity of striatal neurons reflects dynamic encoding and recoding of procedural memories

    Nature

    (2005)
  • M.A. Bedard et al.

    Differential effects of D2- and D4-blocking neuroleptics on the procedural learning of schizophrenic patients

    Can J Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • M.A. Bedard et al.

    Procedural learning in schizophrenia: further consideration on the deleterious effect of neuroleptics

    Brain Cogn

    (2000)
  • D. Centonze et al.

    Dopaminergic control of synaptic plasticity in the dorsal striatum

    Eur J Neurosci

    (2001)
  • W.Y. Choi et al.

    Extended habit training reduces dopamine mediation of appetitive response expression

    J Neurosci

    (2005)
  • J.L. Emken et al.

    Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort

    J Neurophysiol

    (2007)
  • M.S. Fine et al.

    Trial-by-trial transformation of error into sensorimotor adaptation changes with environmental dynamics

    J Neurophysiol

    (2007)
  • A. Floyer-Lea et al.

    Distinguishable brain activation networks for short- and long-term motor skill learning

    J Neurophysiol

    (2005)
  • D.L. Harrington et al.

    Procedural memory in Parkinson’s disease: impaired motor but not visuoperceptual learning

    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol

    (1990)
  • M.S. Jog et al.

    Building neural representations of habits

    Science

    (1999)
  • A. Karni et al.

    Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning

    Nature

    (1995)
  • Cited by (40)

    • A gene-maturation-environment model for understanding sensitive period effects in musical training

      2020, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Animal studies show that brain plasticity associated with auditory learning is greater when the information to be learned is rewarded, or behaviourally relevant [71]. Importantly, dopamine has been shown to modulate motor learning in both humans and animals [72–74], possibly through the reinforcement and habit-formation circuitry of the striatum [75,76]. The interaction of music training and reward may be at its peak during late childhood and adolescence when brain structures and mechanisms associated with motivation are developing rapidly [77,78].

    • Cellular pathophysiology and basal ganglia dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: An overview

      2020, Diagnosis and Management in Parkinson’s Disease: The Neuroscience of Parkinson’s Disease, Volume 1
    • The effects of inter-trial interval on implicit learning of sequential visual isometric pinch task

      2017, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
      Citation Excerpt :

      Knowledge gained through sequential learning can be affected by varying temporal factors such as inter-trial intervals (ITI) or response-stimulus intervals (RSI) (Buonomano et al., 2009; Cheng et al., 2013; Frensch and Miner, 1994; Koegel et al., 1980; Ohashi, 1994; Wolach, 1970). Some behavioural studies have shown that sequence elements are chunked or grouped together during sequential learning (Tremblay et al., 2009, 2010; Wymbs et al., 2012). A chunk is defined as several clusters of information which are separated from each other by intervals or long time gaps (Miller, 1956).

    • The perceptual chunking of speech: A demonstration using ERPs

      2015, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      A classic example is the letter series I B M F B I C I A I R S, which can be learned by recoding items according to the acronyms I B M., F B I., C I A., I R S. This view of chunking continues to prevail not only in studies of verbal memory but also in neurophysiological research on sequence learning (for recent examples, see Boyd et al., 2009; Jin et al., 2014; Tremblay et al., 2009). In fact, many neuroscientists see chunking as a means by which subjects organize sequences so as to overcome limitations in STM.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text