Elsevier

Behavioural Brain Research

Volume 337, 30 January 2018, Pages 91-98
Behavioural Brain Research

Research report
Bilateral dorsal fronto-parietal areas are associated with integration of visual motion information and timed motor action

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.09.046Get rights and content

Abstract

Interaction with the environment often involves situations requiring visuomotor integration. For instance, in fast interceptive actions, the brain must integrate visual information of motion with the appropriate motor action. In such dynamic situation, the brain may control movement based on predictions of where the object will be in the future and when it will arrive there. Although previous studies have analyzed brain regions associated with processing visual information of motion, motor control and visuomotor integration with static objects, less is known about visuomotor integration with moving objects. In the present study we used an event-related fMRI experiment to investigate brain areas integrating visual information of motion with motor action in response to moving objects. Twenty healthy volunteers performed an interceptive task where they had to press a button in synchrony with the arrival of a horizontally moving target at a predefined location. They also performed two control tasks—simple reaction and attention to visual motion—in order to identify and exclude brain areas that would be involved in motor or visual motion processing components that are inherent to interceptive tasks. Through a conjunction analysis, we show greater BOLD signal in a bilateral dorsal fronto-parietal network, as well as the intraparietal sulcus, angular gyrus, and human visual motion area hV5+. We discuss these results with respect to their previously identified functions, and suggest they play a role in visuomotor integration with moving objects.

Introduction

Interaction with the environment often involves situations requiring visuomotor integration. For instance, to reach for and grasp a cup of coffee, the brain transforms the visual information of the position of the cup into appropriate motor commands [1], [2]. Visuomotor integration is even more complicated when we interact with the environment in dynamic situations. We also have to estimate an objects changing position over time, such as catching a flying ball coming towards us, or avoiding to be hit by a car while crossing the street. Many studies have investigated possible optical variables involved in visuomotor integration (see [3], [4], for reviews) and the neural basis for the integration of static visual information with reaching and grasping movements (see [5], [2], for reviews). However, less attention has been given to the neural underpinnings of the integration of visual information and motor actions in dynamic scenarios.

Dynamic situations with high temporal constraints, such as fast interceptive actions, may be controlled using predictions of where the object will be in the future and when it will arrive there [6], [7], [8], [4]. The building blocks for estimating when an object will be intercepted, such as distance between two objects, velocity and direction of motion, have been thoroughly investigated in primates and humans [9], [10], [11]. Only few neuroimaging studies have tried to understand how and in which areas of the brain these elements are integrated to perform temporal prediction of moving objects. For instance, Indovina and collegues [12] have shown that a network comprising bilateral fronto-parietal areas is associated with intercepting moving targets (see also [13], [14], [15]). However, these studies fail to precisely identify which regions are associated with visuomotor integration per se because control conditions lack either similar low-level visual or motor information, such as same motor output or visual stimuli [14], or high-level attentional aspects of the task [12], [13], such as attending target motion. Another issue is the lack of spatial specificity of the recording method (MEG: [15]). In contrast to interceptive tasks, temporal estimation in perceptual tasks involve a left lateralized network comprising the supramarginal gyrus and the ventral premotor cortex [16], [17], [18], [19]. Therefore, it remains to be shown whether the central nervous system relies on a bilateral or left lateralized fronto-parietal network to integrate temporal information extracted from target motion in an interceptive task.

In the present study we sought to identify which brain regions are associated with integrating visual information of a moving target and a timed motor action in a coincident anticipation task using fMRI. Coincident anticipation tasks are a class of interceptive actions in which the participant presses a button in synchrony with the arrival of the target at a predetermined position [20]. We hypothesized that the supramarginal gyrus and ventral premotor cortex on the left hemisphere would be associated with this type of visuomotor integration task because it was previously associated with temporal prediction in perceptual tasks [17], [18]. We also hypothesized that the borders of the intraparietal sulcus would be involved in the visuomotor integration given that it has been previously associated with visuomotor integration with static visual information [1], [2] and given that it has connections with premotor cortex [21], [22], [23]. In order to control for low-level—general motor or visual motion processes—and high-level—motor preparation and attention to visual motion—activations, we compared the activation in the coincident anticipation task to reaction time and attention to visual motion conditions. Whenever our initial hypotheses were not met, we explored possible explanations for activity in other brain areas. The comparison of these conditions showed a bilateral dorsal fronto-parietal network, as well as activity in the ascending limb of the inferior temporal sulcus (hV5+ complex; [24], [25]) and the angular gyrus.

Section snippets

Participants

Twenty young healthy adults participated in our study (7 female; 26.1 ± 5.07 years old, mean ± standard deviation). All participants were right handed as assessed by the Edinburgh inventory [26], had normal or corrected to normal vision, and no history of neurological disease prior to this study. All participants provided consent by signing a form approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Experimental design and procedures

Participants

Results

We designed an experiment to verify which areas of the brain are associated with integrating visual information of motion and a timed motor action in a simple interceptive task while acquiring fMRI data. In this interceptive task, participants pressed a button in synchrony with the arrival of a moving target at a predefined location. They also performed two control tasks—simple reaction and attention to visual motion—in order to identify and exclude brain areas that would be involved in general

Discussion

Here we examined which areas of the brain are associated with integrating visual information of motion and a timed motor action. We conducted an event-related fMRI experiment comparing a main task in which participants performed a coincident anticipation task, with two control tasks that would show effects of motor production and attention to visual motion. Our results showed a bilateral dorsal parietal-premotor network comprising the intraparietal sulcus, posterior superior parietal lobule and

Acknowledgements

We thank Matthias Nau for valuable comments on an initial version of the manuscript. This work was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior (CAPES) as a scholarship to RMAN and CNPq grant n. 308836/2011-1 (EAJ).

References (78)

  • M. Jenkinson et al.

    Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images

    Neuroimage

    (2002)
  • M. Jenkinson et al.

    A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images

    Med. Image Anal.

    (2001)
  • M.W. Woolrich et al.

    Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data

    Neuroimage

    (2001)
  • J. Grinband et al.

    Detection of time-varying signals in event-related fMRI designs

    Neuroimage

    (2008)
  • C.F. Beckmann et al.

    General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • M. Woolrich

    Robust group analysis using outlier inference

    Neuroimage

    (2008)
  • M.W. Woolrich et al.

    Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference

    Neuroimage

    (2004)
  • T. Nichols et al.

    Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic

    Neuroimage

    (2005)
  • J. Coull et al.

    Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (2008)
  • M. Wiener et al.

    Implicit timing activates the left inferior parietal cortex

    Neuropsychologia

    (2010)
  • J. Cotti et al.

    Functionally dissociating temporal and motor components of response preparation in left intraparietal sulcus

    Neuroimage

    (2011)
  • M. Corbetta et al.

    A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements

    Neuron

    (1998)
  • M.F. Rushworth et al.

    Contrasting roles for cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behaviour

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2007)
  • K.M. O’Craven et al.

    Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT–MST

    Neuron

    (1997)
  • T. Schenk et al.

    The role of V5/MT+ in the control of catching movements: an rTMS study

    Neuropsychologia

    (2005)
  • J. Prado et al.

    Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision

    Neuron

    (2005)
  • Y. Rossetti et al.

    Visually guided reaching: bilateral posterior parietal lesions cause a switch from fast visuomotor to slow cognitive control

    Neuropsychologia

    (2005)
  • R.B. Tootell et al.

    The retinotopy of visual spatial attention

    Neuron

    (1998)
  • M. Vesia et al.

    Specialization of reach function in human posterior parietal cortex

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (2012)
  • D. Regan

    Visual factors in hitting and catching

    J. Sports Sci.

    (1997)
  • M. Zago et al.

    Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception

    Exp. Brain Res. Exp. Hirnforsch.

    (2009)
  • J.C. Dessing et al.

    How position, velocity, and temporal information combine in the prospective control of catching: data and model

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (2005)
  • H. Katsumata et al.

    Prospective versus predictive control in timing of hitting a falling ball

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (2011)
  • J.R. Tresilian

    Hitting a moving target: perception and action in the timing of rapid interceptions

    Percept. Psychophys.

    (2005)
  • I. Indovina et al.

    Representation of visual gravitational motion in the human vestibular cortex

    Science

    (2005)
  • W.L. Miller et al.

    Vestibular nuclei and cerebellum put visual gravitational motion in context

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2008)
  • P. Senot et al.

    Cortical dynamics of anticipatory mechanisms in interception: a neuromagnetic study

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (2008)
  • J.T. Coull et al.

    Using time-to-contact information to assess potential collision modulates both visual and temporal prediction networks

    Front. Hum. Neurosci.

    (2008)
  • J.X. O’Reilly et al.

    The cerebellum predicts the timing of perceptual events

    J. Neurosci.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Resting-state functional brain connectivity is related to subsequent procedural learning skills in school-aged children

      2021, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Results showed that stronger intrinsic rsFC between the right (i.e., ipsilateral to the performing hand) M1 cortex and the left supramarginal gyrus in the alpha frequency band was associated with better subsequent visuomotor response time (i.e., lower RTs). The left supramarginal gyrus is known to play key roles in motor actions such as movement preparation (Krams et al., 1998), ideomotor transformations (Króliczak et al., 2016), motor intentions (i.e., the state of readiness to make a movement; Hesse et al., 2006), as well as perceptual prediction (de Azevedo Neto & Amaro Júnior, 2018). Furthermore, the M1 cortex ipsilateral to the movement is known to be involved in fine/complex finger movements (Chen et al., 1997) and, especially, in initiating manual key presses during visual reaction time tasks (Miller, 2007).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text