Research reportBilateral dorsal fronto-parietal areas are associated with integration of visual motion information and timed motor action
Introduction
Interaction with the environment often involves situations requiring visuomotor integration. For instance, to reach for and grasp a cup of coffee, the brain transforms the visual information of the position of the cup into appropriate motor commands [1], [2]. Visuomotor integration is even more complicated when we interact with the environment in dynamic situations. We also have to estimate an objects changing position over time, such as catching a flying ball coming towards us, or avoiding to be hit by a car while crossing the street. Many studies have investigated possible optical variables involved in visuomotor integration (see [3], [4], for reviews) and the neural basis for the integration of static visual information with reaching and grasping movements (see [5], [2], for reviews). However, less attention has been given to the neural underpinnings of the integration of visual information and motor actions in dynamic scenarios.
Dynamic situations with high temporal constraints, such as fast interceptive actions, may be controlled using predictions of where the object will be in the future and when it will arrive there [6], [7], [8], [4]. The building blocks for estimating when an object will be intercepted, such as distance between two objects, velocity and direction of motion, have been thoroughly investigated in primates and humans [9], [10], [11]. Only few neuroimaging studies have tried to understand how and in which areas of the brain these elements are integrated to perform temporal prediction of moving objects. For instance, Indovina and collegues [12] have shown that a network comprising bilateral fronto-parietal areas is associated with intercepting moving targets (see also [13], [14], [15]). However, these studies fail to precisely identify which regions are associated with visuomotor integration per se because control conditions lack either similar low-level visual or motor information, such as same motor output or visual stimuli [14], or high-level attentional aspects of the task [12], [13], such as attending target motion. Another issue is the lack of spatial specificity of the recording method (MEG: [15]). In contrast to interceptive tasks, temporal estimation in perceptual tasks involve a left lateralized network comprising the supramarginal gyrus and the ventral premotor cortex [16], [17], [18], [19]. Therefore, it remains to be shown whether the central nervous system relies on a bilateral or left lateralized fronto-parietal network to integrate temporal information extracted from target motion in an interceptive task.
In the present study we sought to identify which brain regions are associated with integrating visual information of a moving target and a timed motor action in a coincident anticipation task using fMRI. Coincident anticipation tasks are a class of interceptive actions in which the participant presses a button in synchrony with the arrival of the target at a predetermined position [20]. We hypothesized that the supramarginal gyrus and ventral premotor cortex on the left hemisphere would be associated with this type of visuomotor integration task because it was previously associated with temporal prediction in perceptual tasks [17], [18]. We also hypothesized that the borders of the intraparietal sulcus would be involved in the visuomotor integration given that it has been previously associated with visuomotor integration with static visual information [1], [2] and given that it has connections with premotor cortex [21], [22], [23]. In order to control for low-level—general motor or visual motion processes—and high-level—motor preparation and attention to visual motion—activations, we compared the activation in the coincident anticipation task to reaction time and attention to visual motion conditions. Whenever our initial hypotheses were not met, we explored possible explanations for activity in other brain areas. The comparison of these conditions showed a bilateral dorsal fronto-parietal network, as well as activity in the ascending limb of the inferior temporal sulcus (hV5+ complex; [24], [25]) and the angular gyrus.
Section snippets
Participants
Twenty young healthy adults participated in our study (7 female; 26.1 ± 5.07 years old, mean ± standard deviation). All participants were right handed as assessed by the Edinburgh inventory [26], had normal or corrected to normal vision, and no history of neurological disease prior to this study. All participants provided consent by signing a form approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Experimental design and procedures
Participants
Results
We designed an experiment to verify which areas of the brain are associated with integrating visual information of motion and a timed motor action in a simple interceptive task while acquiring fMRI data. In this interceptive task, participants pressed a button in synchrony with the arrival of a moving target at a predefined location. They also performed two control tasks—simple reaction and attention to visual motion—in order to identify and exclude brain areas that would be involved in general
Discussion
Here we examined which areas of the brain are associated with integrating visual information of motion and a timed motor action. We conducted an event-related fMRI experiment comparing a main task in which participants performed a coincident anticipation task, with two control tasks that would show effects of motor production and attention to visual motion. Our results showed a bilateral dorsal parietal-premotor network comprising the intraparietal sulcus, posterior superior parietal lobule and
Acknowledgements
We thank Matthias Nau for valuable comments on an initial version of the manuscript. This work was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior (CAPES) as a scholarship to RMAN and CNPq grant n. 308836/2011-1 (EAJ).
References (78)
- et al.
Human medial intraparietal cortex subserves visuomotor coordinate transformation
Neuroimage
(2004) - et al.
Human parietal cortex in action
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(2006) Building blocks for time-to-contact estimation by the brain
- et al.
Mapping the parietal cortex of human and non-human primates
Neuropsychol. Visuomotor Functions Posterior Parietal Cortex
(2006) - et al.
Similarities and differences in motion processing between the human and macaque brain: evidence from fMRI
Neuropsychologia
(2003) - et al.
Differential contribution of velocity and distance to time estimation during self-initiated time-to-collision judgment
Neuropsychologia
(2015) - et al.
Difficulty of perceptual spatiotemporal integration modulates the neural activity of left inferior parietal cortex
Neuroscience
(2005) - et al.
Left inferior parietal cortex integrates time and space during collision judgments
Neuroimage
(2003) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory
Neuropsychologia
(1971)- et al.
Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm
Neuroimage
(2003)
Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images
Neuroimage
A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images
Med. Image Anal.
Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data
Neuroimage
Detection of time-varying signals in event-related fMRI designs
Neuroimage
General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI
Neuroimage
Robust group analysis using outlier inference
Neuroimage
Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference
Neuroimage
Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic
Neuroimage
Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
Implicit timing activates the left inferior parietal cortex
Neuropsychologia
Functionally dissociating temporal and motor components of response preparation in left intraparietal sulcus
Neuroimage
A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements
Neuron
Contrasting roles for cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behaviour
Trends Cogn. Sci.
Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT–MST
Neuron
The role of V5/MT+ in the control of catching movements: an rTMS study
Neuropsychologia
Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision
Neuron
Visually guided reaching: bilateral posterior parietal lesions cause a switch from fast visuomotor to slow cognitive control
Neuropsychologia
The retinotopy of visual spatial attention
Neuron
Specialization of reach function in human posterior parietal cortex
Exp. Brain Res.
Visual factors in hitting and catching
J. Sports Sci.
Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception
Exp. Brain Res. Exp. Hirnforsch.
How position, velocity, and temporal information combine in the prospective control of catching: data and model
J. Cogn. Neurosci.
Prospective versus predictive control in timing of hitting a falling ball
Exp. Brain Res.
Hitting a moving target: perception and action in the timing of rapid interceptions
Percept. Psychophys.
Representation of visual gravitational motion in the human vestibular cortex
Science
Vestibular nuclei and cerebellum put visual gravitational motion in context
J. Neurophysiol.
Cortical dynamics of anticipatory mechanisms in interception: a neuromagnetic study
J. Cogn. Neurosci.
Using time-to-contact information to assess potential collision modulates both visual and temporal prediction networks
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
The cerebellum predicts the timing of perceptual events
J. Neurosci.
Cited by (8)
Resting-state functional brain connectivity is related to subsequent procedural learning skills in school-aged children
2021, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :Results showed that stronger intrinsic rsFC between the right (i.e., ipsilateral to the performing hand) M1 cortex and the left supramarginal gyrus in the alpha frequency band was associated with better subsequent visuomotor response time (i.e., lower RTs). The left supramarginal gyrus is known to play key roles in motor actions such as movement preparation (Krams et al., 1998), ideomotor transformations (Króliczak et al., 2016), motor intentions (i.e., the state of readiness to make a movement; Hesse et al., 2006), as well as perceptual prediction (de Azevedo Neto & Amaro Júnior, 2018). Furthermore, the M1 cortex ipsilateral to the movement is known to be involved in fine/complex finger movements (Chen et al., 1997) and, especially, in initiating manual key presses during visual reaction time tasks (Miller, 2007).
Changes in effective connectivity during the visual-motor integration tasks: a preliminary f-NIRS study
2024, Behavioral and Brain FunctionsShould I stay or should I go? The cerebral bases of street-crossing decision
2024, Journal of Neuroscience ResearchPerceptual-Cognitive Integration for Goal-Directed Action in Naturalistic Environments
2023, Journal of NeuroscienceDisrupting short-term memory maintenance in premotor cortex affects serial dependence in visuomotor integration
2021, Journal of Neuroscience