Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 58, Issue 5, 1 September 2005, Pages 355-363
Biological Psychiatry

Original article
Effects of 12 Months of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Naturalistic Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.05.024Get rights and content

Background

The need for effective, long-term treatment for recurrent or chronic, treatment-resistant depression is well established.

Methods

This naturalistic follow-up describes outpatients with nonpsychotic major depressive (n = 185) or bipolar (I or II) disorder, depressed phase (n = 20) who initially received 10 weeks of active (n = 110) or sham vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) (n = 95). The initial active group received another 9 months, while the initial sham group received 12 months of VNS. Participants received antidepressant treatments and VNS, both of which could be adjusted.

Results

The primary analysis (repeated measures linear regression) revealed a significant reduction in 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD24) scores (average improvement, .45 points [SE = .05] per month (p < .001). At exit, HRSD24 response rate was 27.2% (55/202); remission rate (HRSD24 ≤ 9) was 15.8% (32/202). Montgomery Äsberg Depression Rating Scale (28.2% [57/202]) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (34.0% [68/200]) showed similar response rates. Voice alteration, dyspnea, and neck pain were the most frequently reported adverse events.

Conclusions

These 1-year open trial data found VNS to be well tolerated, suggesting a potential long-term, growing benefit in treatment-resistant depression, albeit in the context of changes in depression treatments. Comparative long-term data are needed to determine whether these benefits can be attributed to VNS.

Section snippets

Study Overview

For entry into this naturalistic phase, participants had to have completed the acute phase randomized comparison of sham versus active VNS (10 weeks of either sham or active VNS delivered after 2 weeks of recovery from device implantation) (Rush et al 2000, Rush et al 2003, Rush et al 2004a, Rush et al 1996, Rush et al 2002, Rush et al 2004b, Rush et al 2005). The IRB approvals and informed consents obtained at the beginning of the 12-week acute study (Rush et al 2000, Rush et al 2003, Rush et

Sample Development

The evaluable (n = 205) sample was developed from the implanted/randomized sample (n = 235). Of these 235 participants, two participants were not included in this analysis of the 12-month outcomes (one because of suicide during the acute phase; one because of device explantation secondary to infection during the acute phase). The remaining 233 participants formed the 12-month safety sample.

Of these 233 participants, 28 were not evaluable for efficacy. Three participants had HRSD24 scores <18

Discussion

This 12-month study (n = 205) of VNS used as an adjunct to other antidepressant treatments in patients with treatment-resistant, chronic or recurrent mood disorders revealed statistically significant reductions in depressive symptoms. The primary repeated measures linear regression analysis of the evaluable sample revealed a statistically significant reduction over time in both the HRSD24 total scores and the IDS-SR30 total scores.

The clinical relevance of the symptom reduction was demonstrated

References (38)

  • C.M. DeGiorgio et al.

    Prospective long-term study of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of refractory seizures

    Epilepsia

    (2000)
  • (1993)
  • COSTARTCoding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction Terms

    (1995)
  • R. George et al.

    Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of partial seizures: 3. Long-term follow-up on first 67 patients exiting a controlled study

    Epilepsia

    (1994)
  • F.K. Goodwin et al.

    Medication compliance

  • J.F. Greden

    The burden of recurrent depressionCauses, consequences, and future prospects

    J Clin Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • W. Guy

    ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Publication No. 76–338

    (1976)
  • M. Hamilton

    A rating scale for depression

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1960)
  • M. Hamilton

    Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness

    Br J Soc Clin Psychol

    (1967)
  • Cited by (321)

    • Gut Feelings: Vagal Stimulation Reduces Emotional Biases

      2022, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Antidepressant pharmacotherapy has been shown to decrease the neural response to sad faces, measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (Fu et al., 2004). Since vagus nerve stimulation can be effective for some cases of treatment-resistant depression (Rush et al., 2005; Nemeroff et al., 2006; Aaronson et al., 2013), our findings suggest that one possible mechanism of action could be through attenuating emotional biases, particularly towards sadness, which may help play a role in alleviating depressive symptoms. Indeed, a relevant avenue for further research would be to investigate whether this reduced emotional bias mediates the beneficial effect of tVNS on depression.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text