Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 1156, 2 July 2007, Pages 31-45
Brain Research

Research Report
Dopamine receptor mRNA and protein expression in the mouse corpus striatum and cerebral cortex during pre- and postnatal development

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.043Get rights and content

Abstract

The outcome of dopaminergic signaling and effectiveness of dopaminergic drugs depend on the relative preponderance of each of the five dopamine receptors in a given brain region. The separate contribution of each receptor to overall dopaminergic tone is difficult to establish at a functional level due to lack of receptor subtype specific pharmacological agents. A surrogate for receptor function is receptor protein or mRNA expression. We examined dopamine receptor mRNA expression by quantitative reverse transcription real-time PCR in the striatum, globus pallidus, frontal cortex and cingulate cortex of embryonic and postnatal mice. Samples of each region were collected by laser capture microdissection. D1- and D2-receptor mRNAs were the most abundant in all the regions of the mature brain. The D1-receptor was predominant over the D2-receptor in the frontal and cingulate cortices whereas the situation was reversed in the striatum and globus pallidus. In the proliferative domains of the embryonic forebrain, D3-, D4- and D5-receptors were predominant. In the corpus striatum and cerebral cortex, the D3- and D4-receptors were the only receptors that showed marked developmental regulation. By analyzing D1 receptor protein expression, we show that developmental changes in mRNA expression reliably translate into changes in protein levels, at least for the D1-receptor.

Introduction

Dopamine receptors are associated with a variety of cellular functions. In the mammalian central nervous system, dopamine receptor activation is critical for regulation of mood, motivation and motor function. Dopamine receptors are coupled to G-proteins. Typically, dopamine receptor activation leads to changes in intracellular cAMP levels (Monsma et al., 1990, Robinson and Caron, 1996, Schinelli et al., 1994) and triggers a signaling cascade that culminates in gene transcription (Gerfen, 2000). Based on G-protein partners and intracellular signaling mechanisms, two classes of dopamine receptors are recognized (Monsma et al., 1990, Robinson and Caron, 1996, Schinelli et al., 1994). The D1-like receptors are Gs/olf coupled and their activation results in increased intracellular cAMP. The D2-like receptors are Gi/o coupled and their activation decreases intracellular cAMP. Genes encoding five dopamine receptors have been cloned and based on genetic evidence, the D1-like receptors are further divided into D1- and D5-receptors (D1R and D5R, respectively) and the D2-like receptors into D2-, D3- and D4-receptors (D2R, D3R and D4R, respectively) (Sibley and Monsma, 1992). Although signaling via the adenylyl cyclase–cAMP system is the principal mode of action, dopamine receptors also activate phospho-lipase C via the Gq/11 system and increase intracellular calcium levels (Jin et al., 2003, Rashid et al., 2007). Dopamine receptors also interact with glutamate receptors (Cepeda and Levine, 1998, Lee et al., 2002, Schoffelmeer et al., 2000) and mobilize intracellular Ca2+ stores (Lezcano and Bergson, 2002, Tang and Bezprozvanny, 2004).

Activation of the D1-like and D2-like receptors typically produces opposite effects on intracellular signaling cascades and cell physiology (Stoof and Kebabian, 1984). A physiological balance between the activities of the two receptors is critical for normal neurological function. In fact, perturbation of the physiological balance appears to underlie a variety of neurological and neuro-psychiatric conditions such as Parkinson's disease, depression, schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity, anxiety and drug addiction. Many of the pharmacological agents used in the management of these conditions produce their effects by selectively activating or antagonizing the D1-like or D2-like receptors. Therefore, understanding the relative abundance of each of the five dopamine receptors in a given brain region is helpful for understanding the overall impact of dopaminergic signaling during normal development as well as in disease states.

Accurate estimates of dopamine receptor levels and function in specific brain regions is hampered by low abundance of some of the receptor subtypes, lack of subtype-specific agonists or antagonists, and unreliable antibodies. Low receptor abundance and antibody non-specificity is a particular problem in the developing brain. A surrogate marker for receptor function is receptor mRNA expression. We have used real-time quantitative PCR to compare mRNA levels for each of the five dopamine receptors in different regions of the embryonic and postnatal brain. Samples of the different brain regions were collected by using laser capture microdissection (LCM). Using western blots, we estimated D1-receptor protein levels in the developing and mature striatum and cerebral cortex and compared the protein levels to mRNA levels. Our data show that all five receptor mRNAs are expressed in the proliferative and postmitotic domains as early as embryonic day 12 (E12). The mRNA levels change dynamically during development and each receptor and each brain region show independent patterns of developmental regulation. Furthermore, developmental changes in mRNA levels reliably translate into changes in protein levels, at least for the D1-receptor, validating the usefulness of mRNA measurement as a surrogate for receptor expression.

Section snippets

Results

We collected samples of the embryonic and postnatal brains by laser capture microdissection (LCM; Figs. 1A–E). Samples of proliferative and postmitotic regions were collected from embryonic day 12 (E12) and E15 mice. The proliferative regions analyzed were the lateral ganglionic eminence (LGE), medial ganglionic eminence (MGE), caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE) and neuroepithelium of the dorsal cerebral wall. The postmitotic regions were differentiating fields of the striatum and cerebral wall

Discussion

Our data show that dopamine receptor mRNA expression in the mouse forebrain begins early in the embryonic period and that each mRNA shows a unique, region-specific developmental profile. D1R and D2R mRNAs predominate over the other three mRNAs during development and at maturity (Fig. 7). The embryonic neuroepithelial domains show a preponderance of D2-like (D2R, D3R and D4R) receptor mRNA. Interestingly, although all five mRNA levels change during development, D3R and D4R are the only mRNAs

Animals

Timed-pregnant CD1 mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). Female mice housed with a male for the previous 15–17 h were examined for the presence of vaginal plugs at 9:00 AM. Presence of the plug was taken to indicate conception and the day of plug discovery was designated E0. The day of birth was designated postnatal day 0 (P0). The experimental procedures were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were consistent with the NIH guidelines for

Acknowledgments

Supported by USPHS grants NS43426, DA020796 and P30NS45776 and American Heart SDG 0535138N. We thank Ms. Luba Zagachin of the Neuroscience Center real-time PCR Core facility for her assistance with this work. We also gratefully acknowledge assistance from Dr. Charles Vanderburg of the Advanced Tissue Resource Center at the Harvard Center for Neurodegeneration and Repair.

References (57)

  • N. Sales et al.

    Ontogeny of dopaminergic D2 receptors in the rat nervous system: characterization and detailed autoradiographic mapping with [125I]iodosulpiride

    Neuroscience

    (1989)
  • U.B. Schambra et al.

    Ontogeny of D1A and D2 dopamine receptor subtypes in rat brain using in situ hybridization and receptor binding

    Neuroscience

    (1994)
  • L.P. Shearman et al.

    Widespread expression of functional D1-dopamine receptors in fetal rat brain

    Dev. Brain Res.

    (1997)
  • D.R. Sibley et al.

    Molecular biology of dopamine receptors

    Trends Pharmacol. Sci.

    (1992)
  • D.D. Song et al.

    Genesis and migration patterns of neurons forming the patch and matrix compartments of the rat striatum

    Dev. Brain Res.

    (1994)
  • J.C. Stoof et al.

    Two dopamine receptors: biochemistry, physiology and pharmacology

    Life Sci.

    (1984)
  • T.S. Tang et al.

    Dopamine receptor-mediated Ca(2+) signaling in striatal medium spiny neurons

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • J.M. Van Kampen et al.

    A possible role for dopamine D(3) receptor stimulation in the induction of neurogenesis in the adult rat substantia nigra

    Neuroscience

    (2005)
  • L. Zhang et al.

    D1 dopamine receptor regulation of cell cycle in FGF- and EGF-supported primary cultures of embryonic cerebral cortical precursor cells

    Int. J. Dev. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • J. Altman et al.

    Atlas of Prenatal Rat Brain Development

    (1995)
  • C. Bergson et al.

    Regional, cellular, and subcellular variations in the distribution of D1 and D5 dopamine receptors in primate brain

    J. Neurosci.

    (1995)
  • C. Cepeda et al.

    Dopamine and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor interactions in the neostriatum

    Dev. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • J.E. Crandall et al.

    Dopamine receptor activation modulates GABA neuron migration from the basal forebrain to the cerebral cortex

    J. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • J. Diaz et al.

    Selective expression of dopamine D3 receptor mRNA in proliferative zones during embryonic development of the rat brain

    J. Neurosci.

    (1997)
  • J.C. Fentress et al.

    Observations on the development of the striatum in mice and rats

    Anat. Embryol.

    (1981)
  • G. Fishell et al.

    Pattern formation in the striatum: developmental changes in the distribution of striatonigral neurons

    J. Neurosci.

    (1987)
  • G. Fishell et al.

    Pattern formation in the striatum: neurons with early projections to the substantia nigra survive the cell death period

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1991)
  • A.M. Graybiel et al.

    Chemospecificity of ontogenetic units in the striatum: demonstration by combining [3H]thymidine neuronography and histochemical staining

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1982)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text