A low-cost solution to measure mouse licking in an electrophysiological setup with a standard analog-to-digital converter
Introduction
Fluid licking in rodents is a rhythmic behavior that is probably driven by a central pattern generator (CPG): it is a highly stereotyped behavior characterized by repetitive tongue and jaw movements, which are in turn under the control of one or more rhythmically active neural networks (for review, see Travers et al., 1997). Monitoring licking activity is also a very useful method for rating the dose-related behavioral effects of acute or chronic drug treatment (e.g. Genn et al., 2003, Hsiao and Spencer, 1983, Peachey et al., 1976).
Licking in rodents has typically been measured with “lickometers” utilizing either electrical, optical or force sensors (for review, see Weijnen, 1998). Electric sensors are most commonly used, and typically depend on a high-frequency ac contact circuit. Commercially available lickometers designed for use with rats and mice come at a cost of a few hundred to several thousand dollars, and vary widely in application, from those used to monitor licks from a single spout/bottle to those capable of switching between multiple spouts/bottles (Glendinning et al., 2002, Hill and Stellar, 1951, Smith, 2001). Here we describe a method that allows the reliable and temporally precise measurement of the licking behavior at virtually no cost, provided that a standard analog-to-digital converter is available. An advantage of our method is that it is easily combined with electrophysiological measurement of neuronal spike activity during licking behavior. A standard stainless steel sipper tube attached to a small drinking bottle is used, occupying minimal space and compatible with almost any existing in vivo recording setup. Most importantly, lick contact produces no significant electrical artifact during extracellular recording of single-unit brain activity.
Section snippets
Animals
Adult male and female mice (>60 days old) from three common inbred strains (C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, BALB/cByJ) were individually housed in plastic shoebox cages in a temperature and humidity-controlled vivarium on a 12:12 h light-dark cycle. Animals were treated according to a protocol approved by the University of Tennessee Health Science Institutional Center Animal Care and Use Committee. Ad libitum water was removed from the cages of mice approximately 23 h prior to training or testing in the
Results
Junction potentials occur wherever dissimilar conductors are in contact. The voltage generated by the contact of the mouse tongue with the spout is due to the metal–water junction potential for the following reasons: (i) connecting the BNC core and shield directly with each other, i.e. short-circuiting the input to ground or via resistors of different magnitude, reduced the 60 Hz cycle noise in the acquired signal but produced no voltage change; (ii) connecting both poles of the BNC via a
Discussion
Lick sensors are valuable tools to study licking and drinking behavior (Weijnen, 1989). Commercially available lickometers come at a cost of a few to several hundred dollars (e.g., TSE systems, model 2.07, Midland, MI; Columbus Instruments drinkometer, Columbus, OH; Stoelting, model 57450, Wood Dale, IL; Med Associates Inc., model ENV-250, St. Albans, VT; Coulbourn Instruments, model H24-01, Allentown, PA; MS-160 Lickometer, DiLog Instruments, Tallahassee, FL). There are three different types
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by startup-funds to Dr. Heck provided by the University of Tennessee Health Science Center Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology. We would like to thank Dr. Randall J. Nelson for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.
References (20)
- et al.
A multi-purpose photocell and touch circuit amplifier
Physiol Behav
(1987) - et al.
A system for studying the microstructure of ingestive behavior in mice
Physiol Behav
(1992) - et al.
Capacitive sensor for lick-by-lick recording of drinking
Physiol Behav
(1979) - et al.
A novel method for detecting licking behavior during recording of electrophysiological signals from the brain
J Neurosci Meth
(2001) - et al.
A new gustometer for psychophysical taste testing in the rat
Physiol Behav
(1990) - et al.
Motor and premotor mechanisms of licking
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
(1997) - et al.
Measurement of licking response execution in the rat
Physiol Behav
(1974) Lick sensors as tools in behavioral and neuroscience research
Physiol Behav
(1989)Licking behavior in the rat: measurement and situational control of licking frequency
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
(1998)- et al.
Amiloride-sensitive signals and NaCl preference and appetite: a lick-rate analysis
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
(2000)
Cited by (62)
Microglia enable cross-modal plasticity by removing inhibitory synapses
2023, Cell ReportsHippocampal Input to the Nucleus Accumbens Shell Enhances Food Palatability
2020, Biological PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :Mice were habituated in daily 30-minute sessions to an activity box (8.5 × 17 inches) containing 1 or 2 freely accessible bottles filled with 10% sucrose water (weight/volume). Licks were recorded with custom-made Arduino-based contact lickometers (Turin, Italy), akin to previous setups (43), where the junction potential between a metal sipper tube and mouse (standing on a metal grid floor supplied with 5 volts) was continuously monitored. Lick rates and bout sizes recorded with this setup were similar to those recorded with Med Associates lickometers and consistent with previous literature (44).
SatB2-Expressing Neurons in the Parabrachial Nucleus Encode Sweet Taste
2019, Cell ReportsCitation Excerpt :In all the cases, the mice were allowed to recover for at least 4 weeks after AAV injection and then behavioral or staining experiments were performed. A brief access taste test was conducted in a custom-made plastic chamber (Neuroscience, Tokyo, Japan) with an opening on one wall for sipper tube access, as previously reported (Hayar et al., 2006). The stainless-steel sipper tube was approximately 4 cm long and was connected to a 15 mL plastic tube containing a taste solution.
Lentiviral-mediated knock-down of GD3 synthase protects against MPTP-induced motor deficits and neurodegeneration
2019, Neuroscience LettersCitation Excerpt :The mouse was then immediately placed at the start of the runway, and allowed to run into the dark box. To assess licking behavior, mice were placed individually in standard housing cages outfitted with contact lickometers as previously described [11,15,39,40]. A metal wire mesh was placed on the bottom of the cage, and a lick was recorded in the form of a junction potential when the animal’s tongue touched the water spout and completed the circuit between the mesh and the lickometer.
Mice overexpressing lamin B1 in oligodendrocytes recapitulate the age-dependent motor signs, but not the early autonomic cardiovascular dysfunction of autosomal-dominant leukodystrophy (ADLD)
2018, Experimental NeurologyCitation Excerpt :The sample sizes for the tests of walking ability are reported in Table S1. Water licking was recorded during the 12-h dark period in the mouse home cage by measuring the junction potential between the steel spout of a water bottle and an aluminum foil on the cage bottom every time the mouse licked the spout, thereby closing the electrical circuit between the foil and the spout with its body (Hayar et al., 2006). The junction potential voltage signals were manually reviewed to reject artefacts and identify trains of ≥ 4 licks.