The individual adjustment method of sleep spindle analysis: Methodological improvements and roots in the fingerprint paradigm
Introduction
Sleep spindles are usually defined as groups of 12–15 Hz sinusoidal electroencephalogram (EEG) waves occurring mainly during stage 2 non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep but occasionally appearing in stages 3 and 4 sleep as well (De Gennaro and Ferrara, 2003). There is growing neurophysiological knowledge regarding the nature of neural mechanisms generating sleep spindles, suggesting the role of hyperpolarization-rebound sequences in thalamocortical relay cells triggered, grouped and synchronized by cortico-cortical networks (Steriade, 2003). Moreover, there is a high-degree of interindividual difference in sleep spindle features accompanied by a remarkable intraindividual (night-to-night) stability (Silverstein and Levy, 1976, Gaillard and Blois, 1981, Werth et al., 1997, Tan et al., 2000, De Gennaro et al., 2005). The NREM sleep EEG power spectra at the 8 to 16 Hz frequency covering alpha and spindle activities is characterized by an individual profile, which is stable over time, resistant to experimental perturbations and strongly influenced by genetic factors (De Gennaro et al., 2008). A distinction of slower and faster sleep spindles based on frequency and topography was given by Gibbs and Gibbs (1950) and confirmed by studies using modern techniques like low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (Anderer et al., 2001), magnetoencephalography (Urakami, 2008), electrocorticography (Nakamura et al., 2003) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (Schabus et al., 2007). The frequency of slow spindles mostly corresponds to the alpha frequency range and detailed EEG studies suggest the possibility that slow spindles are anterior peaks of alpha activity during NREM sleep (De Gennaro and Ferrara, 2003). Given these evidences it is quite surprising that most of the methods of sleep spindle analysis are ultimately still based on, validated by, and tied to visual detection of spindles performed by experienced human scorers. By accepting visual scoring as the final test of automatic sleep spindle analysis one is implicitly assuming that human pattern recognition capacities are still superior to computer-based methods of spindle detection or that modern neurophysiological knowledge did not influence the definition of sleep spindles. Since we do not agree with these assumptions, we developed an improved method of sleep spindle analysis, which is a modified version of our previously published one (Bódizs et al., 2005). Our main starting points in the development of our method were the followings:
- 1.
Sleep spindles are groups of waves in the 9–16 Hz range lasting at least 0.5 s and appearing in NREM sleep EEG records (De Gennaro and Ferrara, 2003, De Gennaro et al., 2005).
- 2.
The exact spectral content of sleep spindles is individual-specific. In humans it emerges as an individually stable trait-like feature characterized most often by two distinct spectral peaks with different topography and sleep cycle dynamics (Werth et al., 1997, De Gennaro et al., 2005, Buckelmüller et al., 2006). There is an exceptionally low channel-by-channel, cycle-by-cycle and night-by-night variation in the individual-specific frequency bands delimiting the slow- and fast sleep spindles (Werth et al., 1997).
Based on these statements we defined sleep spindles as those segments of the NREM sleep EEG which last at least 0.5 s and contribute to one of the two individual-specific spectral peaks observed in the 9–16 Hz range. By accepting this definition our aim was to:
- 1.
define the individual-specific spectral peaks in the 9–16 Hz range;
- 2.
calculate the individual- and derivation-specific amplitude criteria for the two spindle types separately;
- 3.
perform an adequate bandpass-filtering and to obtain the precise envelope curves in the individual-specific frequency ranges;
- 4.
obtain not only the density, but also the mean amplitude and mean duration of the two sleep spindle types for each subject and each EEG derivation;
- 5.
validate our method by testing previously established relationships:
- (a)
topographical difference between slow- and fast sleep spindles (anterior versus posterior predominance of slow- and fast sleep spindles, respectively);
- (b)
declining trend of slow spindling and increasing trend of fast spindling over consecutive sleep cycles;
- (c)
drop of sleep spindles with ageing and its interaction with sleep cycle effects;
- (a)
- 6.
compare the output of our automatic sleep spindle detection technique with the visual procedure performed by a trained expert.
Our previously published method (Bódizs et al., 2005) was modified in accordance with our sleep spindle definition and with new developments in the field. As regarding methodological improvements we introduced the zero-padding of EEG segments prior to fast Fourier transformation (FFT), as this was shown to be a reliable method of estimating the dominant spindle frequencies (Huupponen et al., 2006). Moreover, bandpass-filtering was based on Gauss-filters instead of Butterworth ones. And lastly we did not introduce any ad hoc correction in the amplitude criteria, but calculated a precise envelope of the filtered signals.
We hypothesized that the individual adjustment method (IAM) of sleep spindle analysis, which is an operationalization and application of our sleep spindle definition on human sleep EEG records:
- 1.
results in spindle detections, which behave as slow- and fast sleep spindles in terms of topography, sleep cycle effects and age;
- 2.
results in sleep spindles with an individual-specific spectral content paralleling the individual fingerprints of sleep EEG spectra, but being also articular in terms of the individual-specific spectral peaks;
- 3.
is much more sensitive than visual detection performed by human experts (detect more spindles than humans), but the extra-spindles detected by the IAM:
- (a)
share the individual-specific spectral content unlike those visually detected spindles which are not covered by IAM;
- (b)
are characterized by an amplitude spectrum exceeding the average amplitude spectrum of the whole EEG segment (spindle + no-spindle) in terms of individual-specific spindle-peaks unlike those visually detected spindles which are not covered by IAM.
- (a)
Section snippets
Subjects and procedures
Polysomnographic recordings of 46 adult subjects (29 men and 17 women; mean age: 32.46 years; age range: 17–55) participating in two different research projects were used as a database for the current research. The research protocols were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Institute of Behavioural Sciences Semmelweis University Budapest. All subjects signed informed consent for the participation in the studies. According to a semi-structured interview subjects were healthy and free of any
The frequency of slow- and fast sleep spindles
Based on the procedure described above (Section 2.2) we determined the individualized frequency limits for slow- and fast sleep spindles in NREM periods 1–4. Results are presented in Table 1. In general slow spindles were slower than 12 Hz, while fast spindles were faster than 12.5 Hz. However, this cannot be considered a rule, as there were subjects with slow spindle frequencies between 12.15 and 13.26 Hz or subjects with fast spindle frequencies between 11.76 and 12.84 Hz for example. In the
Discussion
The accurate analysis of sleep spindling has remarkable practical and theoretical importance. This is underlined by the reported cognitive (Bódizs et al., 2005, Bódizs et al., 2008, Clemens et al., 2005, Clemens et al., 2006, Schabus et al., 2007, Schabus et al., 2008, Fogel et al., 2007) and clinical neuropsychiatric (Donnet et al., 1992, Ferrarelli et al., 2007, Petit et al., 2004, Limoges et al., 2005, Gürses et al., 2005) correlates of different sleep spindle measures. Given the high
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Office for Research and Technology (NKFP-1B/020/04) and the National Research Fund (OTKA TS-049785 and OTKA-48927). The first author is supported by the János Bolyai Research Fellowship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
References (30)
- et al.
Unihemispheric enhancement of delta power in human frontal sleep EEG by prolonged wakefulness
Brain Res
(2001) - et al.
Low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography revealed simultaneously active frontal and parietal sleep spindle sources in the human cortex
Neuroscience
(2001) - et al.
Trait-like individual differences in the human sleep electroencephalogram
Neuroscience
(2006) - et al.
Overnight verbal memory retention correlates with the number of sleep spindles
Neuroscience
(2005) - et al.
Twenty-four hours retention of visuospatial memory correlates with the number of parietal sleep spindles
Neurosci Lett
(2006) - et al.
An electroencephalographic fingerprint of human sleep
Neuroimage
(2005) - et al.
Sleep spindles: an overview
Sleep Med Rev
(2003) - et al.
Determination of dominant simulated spindle frequency with different methods
J Neurosci Methods
(2006) - et al.
Effect of age on the sleep EEG: slow-wave activity and spindle frequency activity in young and middle-aged men
Brain Res
(1996) - et al.
Sleep spindles in human prefrontal cortex: an electrocorticographic study
Neurosci Res
(2003)
Sleep and quantitative EEG in neurodegenerative disorders
J Psychosom Res
Interindividual sleep spindle differences and their relation to learning related enhancements
Brain Res
The stability of the sigma sleep spindle
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol
High internight reliability of computer-measured NREM delta, sigma, and beta: biological implications
Biol Psychiatry
Spindle frequency activity in the sleep EEG: individual differences and topographic distribution
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol
Cited by (102)
Fundamentals of sleep regulation: Model and benchmark values for fractal and oscillatory neurodynamics
2024, Progress in NeurobiologyAnalysis of slow and fast sleep spindle properties in Parkinson's disease – A comparative EEG study
2022, International Journal of PsychophysiologyCitation Excerpt :The artefactual segments were manually annotated on a 4 second basis. Automated SS analysis was performed on artefact-free segments of NREM sleep with the Individual Adjustment Method (IAM) (Bódizs et al., 2009; Ujma et al., 2015) using Fercio's EEG Plus Polysomnography program as well. SS density (number of SS/min), duration (s), middle amplitude (μV), and oscillatory frequency (Hz) of slow and fast spindles were analysed according to each EEG leads, than separately over the Fp1, Fp2, F3, F4, Fz, F7, and F8 leads for slow-, and over the C3, C4, Cz, P3, P4 and Pz leads for fast spindles using an average-reference montage.
The relation between sigma power and internalizing problems across development
2021, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchThe laminar profile of sleep spindles in humans
2021, NeuroImageTemporal association between sleep spindles and ripples in the human anterior and mediodorsal thalamus
2024, European Journal of NeuroscienceAssociation of actigraphy-derived circadian phase indicators with the nadir of spindle frequency
2024, Biological Rhythm Research