Elsevier

Neuroscience Letters

Volume 370, Issues 2–3, 11 November 2004, Pages 114-117
Neuroscience Letters

Dopamine in the orbitofrontal cortex regulates operant responding under a progressive ratio of reinforcement in rats

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.08.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Prefrontocortical dopamine (DA) plays an essential role in the regulation of cognitive functions and behavior. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) receives a dopaminergic projection from the ventral tegmental area and is particularly important for goal-directed appetitive behaviors and for the neural representation of reward value. We here examined the effects of DA receptor blockers locally infused into the OFC, on instrumental behavior under a progressive schedule of reinforcement. After continuous reinforcement training (lever pressing for casein pellets) rats received bilateral intra-OFC-infusions of the DA D1-receptor antagonist SCH23390 (3 μg/0.5 μl), the DA D2-receptor antagonist sulpiride (3 μg/0.5 μl), or phosphate buffered saline through chronically indwelling cannulae. Immediately after infusion they were tested under a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement (3, 6, 9, 12, … lever presses for 1 casein pellet within 180 s). Both SCH23390 and sulpiride led to a significant reduction of the break point (cessation to respond to the increasing criterion of instrumental effort) compared to vehicle infusions. A food preference test revealed no drug effects on the amount of consumed pellets and on the preference of casein pellets over laboratory chow. Leftward shifts of the break point in progressive ratio tasks indicate a disturbance of the mechanisms that translate motivation into appetitive behavior under conditions of increasing instrumental effort. Therefore, our data indicate that orbitofrontal dopamine is necessary for reward-related instrumental behavior.

Section snippets

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by DFG (SFB 517). We thank Mr. Kai Diederich for technical help, and Professor Wolfgang Hauber for helpful comments on the manuscript.

References (24)

  • J.M. Fuster

    Frontal lobe and cognitive development

    J. Neurocytol.

    (2003)
  • M. Gallagher et al.

    Orbitofrontal cortex and representation of incentive value in associative learning

    J. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Impulsivity is related to overhasty risk learning in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A computational psychiatric approach

      2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      JTC due to dopamine dysregulation has been shown to be a sensitive marker for Parkinson's disease (de Rezende Costa et al., 2016), and theoretically, JTC is considered a precision imbalance problem (Adams et al., 2016). Thus, it is not surprising that the orbitofrontal cortex, which receives dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area and is particularly important for the neural representation of reward value (Cetin et al., 2004), is highlighted by the data-driven CPM approach. One strength of our study is that we used a computational psychiatric approach to investigate the pathology in ADHD patients, focused on overt risk-taking.

    • Dopamine D1 receptors in the medial orbitofrontal cortex support effort-related responding in rats

      2020, European Neuropsychopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, it is conceivable that intra-mOFC D1R activity supports value-based signaling thereby modulating high effort responding. Notably, D1R blockade in the lateral OFC (lOFC) also reduced effort-related responding (Cetin et al., 2004). While mOFC and lOFC in part mediate distinct functions, there is also evidence that some functions of the lOFC are redundant to mOFC (Izquierdo, 2017).

    • Decline of prefrontal cortical-mediated executive functions but attenuated delay discounting in aged Fischer 344 × brown Norway hybrid rats

      2017, Neurobiology of Aging
      Citation Excerpt :

      Age comparisons of latency data were conducted using a multifactor ANOVA, with age as a between-subjects factor, and both choice type (2 levels, small and large) and delay (5 levels) as within-subjects factors. This task evaluated rats' motivation to press a lever to obtain food reward and was based on a design used previously by our lab and others (Barr and Phillips, 1999; Cetin et al., 2004; Kheramin et al., 2005; Mendez et al., 2009). Instrumental responding for food reward was assessed using a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement, on which the number of lever presses required to earn a reward increased with each successive reward earned (1, 4, 10, 20, 35, …).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text