Elsevier

Neuroscience Letters

Volume 497, Issue 3, 27 June 2011, Pages 240-246
Neuroscience Letters

Review
The time course of acquired epilepsy: Implications for therapeutic intervention to suppress epileptogenesis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.071Get rights and content

Abstract

Relatively little is known about the time course of the development of spontaneous recurrent seizures (i.e., epileptogenesis) after brain injury in human patients, or even in animal models. This time course is determined, at least in part, by the underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for acquired epilepsy. An understanding of the critical mechanistic features of acquired epilepsy will be useful, if not essential, for developing strategies to block or suppress epileptogenesis. Here, data on the time course of the development of spontaneous recurrent seizures are summarized from experiments using nearly continuous electrographic (EEG) recordings in (1) kainate-treated rats, which are a model of temporal lobe epilepsy, and (2) rats subjected to unilateral carotid occlusion with superimposed hypoxia at postnatal day 7, which is a model of perinatal stroke. Although the classical view of the development of epileptogenesis is a step-function of time after the brain injury, with a latent period present between the brain injury and the first unprovoked seizure, the data described here show that seizure frequency was a sigmoid function of time after the insult in both animal models. Furthermore, the spontaneous recurrent seizures often occurred in clusters, even shortly after the first spontaneous seizure. These data suggest that (1) epileptogenesis is a continuous process that extends past the first spontaneous clinical seizure, (2) seizure clusters can obscure this continuous process, and (3) the potential time for administration of a therapy to suppress acquired epilepsy extends well past the first clinical seizure.

Highlights

► The classical view of the development of epileptogenesis is a step-function of time after the brain injury. Based on nearly-continuous electrographic (EEG) recordings, seizure frequency was a sigmoid function of time after the insult in two different animal models of acquired epilepsy. ► Spontaneous recurrent seizures often occurred in clusters, even shortly after the first spontaneous seizure. ► The data suggest that (1) epileptogenesis is a continuous process, (2) seizure clusters can obscure this continuous process, and (3) the potential time for administration of a therapy to suppress acquired epilepsy extends well past the first clinical seizure.

Introduction

In order to develop strategies for preventing epileptogenesis, it is critical to understand the temporal features of acquired epilepsy. Brain insults such as traumatic brain injury, stroke, status epilepticus, and infection/inflammation are some of the causes of acquired epilepsy, which usually occurs after a latent period and is often progressive (i.e., the seizures become more frequent and severe over time). Because many patients receive antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to suppress the symptomatic or “early” seizures directly associated with the brain injury, and most patients are treated with AEDs after one or a few “late” (i.e., “epileptic”) clinical seizures, it is virtually impossible to analyze quantitatively the temporal features of acquired epileptogenesis in humans (i.e., the time-dependent development of spontaneous recurrent seizures), independent of the effects of AEDs. In order to study the effects of potential antiepileptogenic or disease-modifying drugs on acquired epileptogenesis in a quantitative manner, one needs to know the time-course of development of spontaneous recurrent seizures after a brain injury. Animal models of acquired epilepsy provide a means to assess how different types of brain injury lead to an epileptic state, independent of the effects of AEDs. The studies summarized here have analyzed the time course of the development of spontaneous recurrent seizures in two animal models of acquired epilepsy, one of temporal lobe epilepsy and the other of perinatal stroke. These studies are based on nearly continuous electrographic (EEG) recordings with radiotelemetry and correlated video monitoring in kainate-treated rats [41] and in an animal model of hypoxic–ischemic brain damage in immature rats [31], [40].

Numerous hypothetical mechanisms have been proposed to account for, or at least contribute to, epileptogenesis after a brain injury. Molecular and cellular studies have been oriented towards analyses of changes that would occur during the latent period, which is the time from a brain injury to the first clinical seizure. Although it is widely believed that the latent period marks the duration of epileptogenesis, relatively little is known about when the different possible mechanisms of epileptogenesis occur. For example, we do not know if these processes are completed before the first clinical seizure or whether they continue beyond this time point, and if so for how long. The present studies aimed to provide information on the frequency and pattern of spontaneous recurrent seizures as a function of time after the brain injury. One important rationale for the research is that the time course of the development of epileptogenesis is fundamental to an understanding of the mechanisms of acquired epilepsy, and may place constraints on which possible mechanisms are likely to contribute to epileptogenesis after brain injury. In addition, understanding the time course of epileptogenesis is important for deciding when a hypothetical disease-modifying or antiepileptogenic therapy should be administered.

Section snippets

Issues relevant to studies aimed at preventing epileptogenesis

A fundamental question is whether acquired epilepsy is optimally described as a step function (i.e., all or none) or a continuous function (e.g., a sigmoid curve) of time after the brain injury [41]. The second hypothesis implies a slow, gradual and progressive development of epilepsy after the brain injury. Both hypotheses are illustrated in Fig. 1; they may be considered as two extremes along a continuum. Another set of important questions are: What is the duration of the latent period, and

Animal models

Most animal models of temporal lobe epilepsy with spontaneous recurrent seizures are based on status epilepticus, which has been induced with either electrical stimulation or administration of a chemo-convulsant drug. The present studies used the repeated low-dose kainate model of status epilepticus [6], [10], [11], [26], [27]. Hypoxic–ischemic brain injury in immature rats [30], [35], [40] was used as an animal model of perinatal stroke, which is a major cause of intractable epilepsy in

Electrophysiological and histopathological methods

EEG recordings were obtained with a three-channel implantable, radiotelemetry system (Data Sciences International). For kainate-treated rats, two electrodes were positioned bilaterally in the dorsal dentate gyrus, and another recording channel provided a surface EEG. In the postnatal day 7 hypoxic–ischemic animals, one electrode was located over the anticipated infarct region, another was located ipsilaterally in the nearby neocortex, and the third electrode was located in the contralateral

Is acquired epileptogenesis progressive?

Numerous studies have provided data on the question of whether acquired epilepsy is progressive. As introduced above, one view is that acquired epilepsy (e.g., temporal lobe epilepsy) is generally static after a latent period; that is, seizure frequency and severity are variable over time, but do not progressively increase to any major degree (i.e., the step-function hypothesis, Fig. 1). An opposing view is that acquired epilepsy is always progressive, but limitations in the measurement of

Does the latent period mark the time of epileptogenesis?

One of the most interesting and difficult concepts in research on acquired epilepsy is that of the latent period, the time from the brain insult to the observation of the first clinical seizure (Fig. 1). This period in humans can be as short as a few months or as long as many years. One particular difficulty in the field is to explain the mechanistic basis for the cases of exceptionally long latent periods (i.e., many years). Bertram and Cornett [4], [5], using a model based on electrically

The possible significance of seizure clusters?

Many patients with acquired epilepsy, particularly those that are intractable, have seizures that occur in clusters [22], [23], [24], [25]. Similarly, apparent clusters of seizures have been observed in both the kainate [21] and the pilocarpine [18] models of chronic epilepsy. If the occurrence of seizures was random, one could still expect to observe apparent seizure clusters by chance. Williams and co-workers [41] measured successive inter-seizure intervals for the first 100 days after

Progression of epileptogenesis

Although many human patients with acquired epilepsy may not appear to demonstrate progressive epileptogenesis, many others clearly show an increase in seizure frequency and/or severity over time, particularly when considered over several decades [13], [14], [15], [16]. In the present studies, nearly continuous electrographic monitoring for prolonged periods (i.e., months) in rats with kainate-induced epilepsy clearly showed a consistent increase in seizure frequency. This increase in seizure

Conclusions

An improved understanding of the time course of acquired epilepsy is likely to be extremely useful in terms of deciding when to administer anti-epileptogenesis or disease-modifying therapies, and for determining how to assess the potential effects of these therapies. The concepts associated with the step-function hypothesis seem to lead to an exclusive focus on either preventing or reversing the changes associated with acquired epilepsy. To prevent epileptogenesis, therapy administration would

Acknowledgements

Supported by the NINDS and the American Heart Association. These data were derived from collaborative experiments with Phil Williams, Shilpa Kadam, Andrew White, D.J. Ferraro, Suzanne Clark, and Walde Swiercz.

References (41)

  • B. Bergamasco et al.

    Neonatal hypoxia and epileptic risk: a clinical prospective study

    Epilepsia

    (1984)
  • B.C. Bernhardt et al.

    Longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of atrophy in pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy

    Neurology

    (2009)
  • P.S. Buckmaster et al.

    Neuron loss, granule cell axon reorganization, and functional changes in the dentate gyrus of epileptic kainate-treated rats

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1997)
  • G.D. Cascino

    Temporal lobe epilepsy is a progressive neurologic disorder: time means neurons!

    Neurology

    (2009)
  • C. Dube et al.

    Temporal lobe epilepsy after experimental prolonged febrile seizures: prospective analysis

    Brain

    (2006)
  • C.M. Dube et al.

    Epileptogenesis provoked by prolonged experimental febrile seizures: mechanisms and biomarkers

    J. Neurosci.

    (2010)
  • F.E. Dudek et al.

    Is neuronal death necessary for acquired epileptogenesis in the immature brain?

    Epilepsy Curr.

    (2010)
  • J. Engel

    Clinical evidence for the progressive nature of epilepsy

    Epilepsy Res.

    (1996)
  • J. Engel

    Natural history of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis: how does kindling compare with other commonly used animal models?

  • J. Engel

    Surgical treatment for epilepsy: too little too late?

    JAMA

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text