Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 32, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages 1100-1105
NeuroImage

Rapid Communication
A1 adenosine receptor PET using [18F]CPFPX: Displacement studies in humans

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.202Get rights and content

Abstract

Background.

Imaging of cerebral A1 adenosine receptors (A1AR) with positron emission tomography (PET) has recently become available for neurological research. To date, it has still not been unraveled if there is a valid reference region without specific radioligand binding that may be used to improve image quantification. We conducted in vivo displacement studies in humans to elucidate this important question using the A1AR ligand [18F]CPFPX.

Methods.

Five healthy male volunteers underwent [18F]CPFPX bolus/infusion PET with short infusion of unlabelled CPFPX as competitor (n = 4; 0.9 to 4.0 mg) or vehicle (n = 1; control condition) after equilibrium of [18F]CPFPX distribution was attained.

Results.

Infusion of CPFPX induced a rapid displacement of [18F]CPFPX binding in all regions, including the cerebellum (region with lowest binding). Even at the highest competitor dose, no full displacement was reached. Displacement was dose-dependent in all regions except the cerebellum where floor effects and/or noise might have obscured dose dependency. Specific binding was estimated to account for about one third and two thirds of total equilibrium uptake in cerebellum and cortex, respectively.

Conclusions.

Although the cerebellum is the region with lowest in vivo [18F]CPFPX binding, it is not an ideal reference region devoid of specific binding. Nevertheless, as will be discussed, the use of a reference region analysis may be a useful, non-invasive alternative analysis method in carefully selected applications.

Introduction

In the recent years, several radioligands have been proposed for in vivo positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of cerebral A1 adenosine receptors (A1AR) (for review see Holschbach and Olsson, 2002), which constitute an attractive target for investigating the neuromodulatory actions of adenosine (for review see Fredholm et al., 2005, Cunha, 2001, Haas and Selbach, 2000). The most successfully employed ligands are [18F]CPFPX (Holschbach et al., 2002) and [11C]MPDX (Noguchi et al., 1997). The equilibrium total distribution volume (DVt) of the ligand in cerebral tissue has been proposed as a PET outcome measure that is directly related to the total density of A1AR available for binding (Bmax′) (Meyer et al., 2004; Fukumitsu et al., 2005). Albeit DVt offers the advantage that it can be reliably estimated using various methods (Meyer et al., 2004, Meyer et al., 2005a, Meyer et al., 2005b, Fukumitsu et al., 2005, Naganawa et al., 2005), even on a voxel-level (Meyer et al., 2005b, Meyer et al., 2006, Naganawa et al., 2005), it suffers two major drawbacks: first, the DVt summarizes both the specific distribution volume (DVs, also termed binding potential (BP) (Mintun et al., 1984), equal to Bmax′/KD with KD being the equilibrium dissociation rate) and the distribution volume of free and non-specifically bound ligand (DVf + ns). The relative contribution of DVs to DVt needs to be known for accurate interpretation of DVt as a measure of A1AR density. Second, the determination of DVt relies on a cumbersome and error-prone measurement of the individual plasma input function, either arterially (Meyer et al., 2004, Fukumitsu et al., 2005) or venously (Meyer et al., 2005a, Meyer et al., 2005b). These drawbacks can be avoided if a valid reference region without specific binding is available and if DVf + ns is the same in all regions: the DVt estimate of the reference region could be employed to calculate DVs in all other regions (either by direct calculation or by parameter constraints in non-linear compartment model fitting). Alternatively, a reference region analysis without blood sampling (for instance Logan's non-invasive graphical analysis, NIGA; Logan et al., 1996) may be used for non-invasive estimation of the DVs/DVf + ns ratio which is another convenient outcome measure related to Bmax′ (also termed BP2, equal to f2·Bmax′/KD with f2 being the fraction of free ligand in tissue (Abi-Dargham et al., 1994)).

It is widely known that there are considerable species differences in regional A1AR expression among various rodents, cats, primates and humans. These differences are particularly striking in the cerebellum, which in agreement with relatively low receptor binding in in vitro autoradiographic studies (Fastbom et al., 1987a; Svenningsson et al., 1997; Bauer et al., 2003) is the region with the lowest DVt in human A1AR PET studies (Bauer et al., 2003, Meyer et al., 2004, Fukumitsu et al., 2005) and therefore has been proposed as a possible reference region (Kimura et al., 2004, Naganawa et al., 2005). In contrast to humans, compared to the A1AR density in cerebral cortex, the A1AR density of the cerebellum is higher in rats, comparably high in mice and (slightly) lower in guinea pigs and cats (Fastbom et al., 1987b). Furthermore, A1AR PET studies in monkeys demonstrated comparable cerebellar and cortical ligand uptake (Wakabayashi et al., 2000, Herzog et al., 2003). This underlines the necessity to conduct in vivo displacement studies in humans to answer the important question of whether there is a valid reference region for A1AR PET studies in humans. This aim was pursued in the present study using bolus/infusion (B/I) [18F]CPFPX PET scanning (Meyer et al., 2005a).

Section snippets

Subjects

All procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Düsseldorf (Germany). Five healthy male volunteers (mean age = 25.7 ± 1.4 years) were included after giving written informed consent. Volunteers were screened for history of neurological and psychiatric diseases. An intake of substances interfering with adenosine receptors (e.g., theophylline) was ruled out. Caffeine intake was not allowed for at least 24 h prior to PET scanning. To exclude

Results

The mean rate of change of the metabolite corrected plasma TAC from 50 to 135 min was 8.5 ± 2.1%/h (8.0%/h, 12.1%/h, 8.1%/h, 6.7%/h and 7.5%/h, respectively; calculated as the slope of a linear regression line relative to the mean of the period 50 to 135 min). Infusion of unlabelled CPFPX in CD as competitor or pure CD as control condition did not noticeably affect the metabolite corrected plasma TAC. The ratio of tissue activity to metabolite corrected plasma activity attained a constant or

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to perform human in vivo A1AR PET displacement studies to elucidate the important question of whether there is a valid reference region that could be used for optimization of image quantification (e.g., by estimating DVs or by avoiding blood sampling). We used [18F]CPFPX as an A1AR ligand. Therefore, all conclusions drawn from the present work primarily apply to [18F]CPFPX although they certainly merit careful consideration if other A1AR ligands are used.

The

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance and support of Lutz Tellmann, Elisabeth Theelen, Suzanne Schaden and Hans Herzog, Institute of Medicine, Research Center Juelich, and Markus Lang, Dirk Bier, Marcus H. Holschbach and Heinz H. Coenen, Institute of Nuclear Chemistry, Research Center Juelich.

This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). This research was partly funded by the Ministry of Science, Germany and by the National Institute of

References (29)

  • J. Noguchi et al.

    Evaluation of carbon-11 labeled KF15372 and its ethyl and methyl derivatives as a potential CNS adenosine A1 receptor ligand

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (1997)
  • S. Wakabayashi et al.

    A PET study of adenosine A1 receptor in anesthetized monkey brain

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2000)
  • A. Abi-Dargham et al.

    SPECT measurement of benzodiazepine receptors in human brain with iodine-123-iomazenil: kinetic and equilibrium paradigms

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (1994)
  • C. Burger et al.

    Requirements and implementation of a flexible kinetic modeling tool

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Present address: Department of Neurology, University Hospital Aachen, Germany.

    View full text