The role of the hippocampus in the retrieval of a spatial location

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2004.08.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Based on computational models of the hippocampus, it has been suggested that a possible mechanism for memory retrieval is pattern completion, wherein an autoassociative network recalls previous patterns of activity given noisy or degraded cues. However, there are few behavioral data examining pattern completion per se in the hippocampus. Here, we present a study in which rats were tested on a spatial location retrieval paradigm, each trial of which consisted of a sample and choice phase. During the sample phase, rats were trained to displace an object in one of 15 possible locations to retrieve a food reward and return to the start-box on a cheeseboard maze. The object was then removed and the same location was re-baited for the choice phase. The rats’ accuracy in returning to the correct location was recorded. On test trials, visual extramaze cues, vestibular cues, or both were manipulated to assess pattern completion in normal rats. Subjects were then randomly assigned to receive a cortical control, a sham, or a dorsal and ventral hippocampal lesion and were retested on the task. Control and unoperated rats were able to perform the task when visual extramaze or vestibular cues were reliable, but not when they were manipulated. Rats with hippocampal lesions were impaired in the baseline condition, as well as during all manipulations. These results support the hypothesis that the hippocampus supports the retrieval of a spatial location, possibly through a process of pattern completion.

Introduction

Among other things, the hippocampus plays a central role in spatial learning and memory (Eichenbaum et al., 1999, Morris et al., 1982, O’Keefe and Nadel, 1978). One mechanism through which the hippocampus aids in memory retrieval as proposed by computational models is pattern completion (Marr, 1971, McNaughton and Morris, 1987, O’Reilly and McClelland, 1994, Recce and Harris, 1996, Willshaw and Buckingham, 1990); the ability to retrieve a stored memory trace based on an incomplete or degraded set of sensory cues. Based on neural connectivity, Marr (1971) originally proposed a dual memory system made up of cortical and hippocampal components. Marr suggested that the hippocampus contains an autoassociative network, that is, a network of interconnected neurons in which a simple representation of an input is formed. Subsequent models of hippocampal function (Kesner and Rolls, 2001, Rolls, 1989, Rolls, 1996, Stringer et al., 2002, Stringer et al., 2002) have also proposed that the hippocampus is able to quickly store memories using an autoassociative network. According to Rolls (1996), “the hippocampus contains one stage, the CA3 stage, which acts as an autoassociation memory.” As evidence for the role of CA3 in pattern completion, Rolls and colleagues (Robertson et al., 1998, Rolls et al., 1997) report that some cells in CA3 respond when a monkey’s view of a particular part of space is briefly obscured by a curtain or darkness. This pattern of firing may reflect a completion of the scene in the absence of the visual input.

Few studies have directly examined the role of the hippocampus in pattern completion. Perhaps the most direct assessment of the hippocampus’s role in pattern completion was made by Nakazawa and colleagues using knockout mice which had the NMDA receptor gene ablated in CA3 (Nakazawa et al., 2002). Knockout mice were found to be impaired relative to controls on probe trials of a spatial memory task when only a subset of extramaze spatial cues which were present at training was presented. Indeed in a subsequent lesion study, rats with CA3 and dentate gyrus lesions, but not CA1 or sham control lesions, were impaired when a subset of visual extramaze cues were present during the test phase of a spatial pattern completion task (Gold & Kesner, 2003). While it is apparent from these studies that animals use visual stimuli when performing a spatial pattern completion task, it is unclear whether egocentric information is also used. According to several models of hippocampal function (Knierim et al., 1998, Rolls, 1999), allocentric (environment-centered visual) and egocentric (idiothetic or vestibular) information interact in the formation and maintenance of spatial memory traces.

The present study proposes to further test the predictions of the computational models using a behavioral paradigm. Specifically, we were interested in first determining if normal rats are able to retrieve a spatial location given degraded allocentric and/or egocentric cues, and second, to what extent the hippocampus is involved in the retrieval process.

Section snippets

Subjects

Subjects were 13 male, Long–Evans rats, each weighing ∼350 g at the beginning of testing. Each rat was initially food deprived to 80% of its free-feeding weight and allowed access to water ad libitum. Rats were housed individually in standard rodent cages and were maintained on a 12 h light/dark cycle. All testing was performed during the light phase of the cycle.

Apparatus

The test apparatus was a dry-land version of the Morris water maze, or “cheeseboard” maze apparatus. The surface of the apparatus stood

Results

Sham and cortical control lesions showed no behavioral or hippocampal anatomical differences and were therefore combined into a single lesion group (n = 7). A repeated measures two-way analysis of variance revealed no main effect for lesion between the dorsal (n = 3) and dorsal plus ventral hippocampal (n = 3) lesion groups (F(1, 4) = 3.756; p = .125) and no manipulation by lesion interaction for the POST block (F(1,4) = 0.535; p = .667). Since the two groups’ performance did not differ significantly, they

Discussion

The above results indicate that normal rats are able to retrieve a spatial location given partial or degraded cues, as in the case of the vestibular manipulation. However, if visual cues used to encode a location are manipulated, normal rats do not have enough input on which to complete. These results are consistent with the observation that in normal rats place fields recorded in CA1 region of the hippocampus became unstable when all significant distance cues were removed (O’Keefe & Conway,

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by NSF Grant IBN 0135273 and NIH Grant 5R01MH065314-02 awarded to R.P.K.

References (38)

  • R. Hirsh

    The hippocampus, conditional operations, and cognition

    Physiological Psychology

    (1980)
  • K.J. Jeffery et al.

    Learned interaction of visual and idiothetic cues in the control of place field orientation

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1999)
  • R.P. Kesner et al.

    The role of the hippocampus in memory for the temporal order of a sequence of odors

    Behavioral Neuroscience

    (2002)
  • R.P. Kesner et al.

    Role of long-term synaptic modification in short-term memory

    Hippocampus

    (2001)
  • J.J. Knierim et al.

    Interactions between idiothetic cues and external landmarks in the control of place cells and head direction cells

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1998)
  • J.J. Knierim et al.

    The interaction between vestibular cues and visual landmark learning in spatial navigation

  • D. Marr

    Simple memory: a theory for archicortex

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B—Biological Sciences

    (1971)
  • R.G.M. Morris et al.

    Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions

    Nature

    (1982)
  • K. Nakazawa et al.

    Requirement for hippocampal CA3 NMDA receptors in associative memory recall

    Science

    (2002)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Unfolding the cognitive map: The role of hippocampal and extra-hippocampal substrates based on a systems analysis of spatial processing

      2018, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
      Citation Excerpt :

      Rats with hippocampal lesions were impaired in the baseline condition, as well as during all manipulations. These results support the hypothesis that the hippocampus supports spatial pattern completion (Kirwan, Gilbert, & Kesner, 2005). In a subsequent study by Gold and Kesner (2005), the number of available visual cues were manipulated using the same delayed matching-to-sample for spatial location task.

    • The operation of pattern separation and pattern completion processes associated with different attributes or domains of memory

      2013, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Unfortunately, at present evaluating contextual fear retrieval using multiple, graded contexts has not been performed beyond using a very similar versus a very different context test, providing a rough measure of pattern separation – and then only across, not within, individual mice/rats. Using a similar task to Gilbert et al. (1998, 2001), Gold and Kesner (2005) demonstrated pattern completion by parametrically altering the quantity of environmental cues available to guide recall for a spatial location (paradigm from Kirwan et al., 2005) – and saw deficits in CA3a,b lesioned rats, as well as in rats with temporary inactivations to mu-opioidergic plasticity mechanisms in CA3a,b (Kesner and Warthen, 2010). The role of mu-opioidergic dependent plasticity was not a minor point in this study as the lateral perforant path inputs into CA3a,b are mu-opioidergic, suggesting a role for the perforant path inputs into CA3a,b for pattern completion (mossy fibers use kappa-opioidergic as co-peptides with glutamate, which were not blocked in this study).

    • Pattern separation deficits following damage to the hippocampus

      2012, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Electrophysiological studies in rodents ( Leutgeb, Leutgeb, Moser, & Moser, 2007; Leutgeb et al. 2005; Leutgeb, Leutgeb, Treves, Moser, & Moser, 2004), neuroimaging studies in humans (Bakker et al., 2008; Lacy, Yassa, Stark, Muftuler, & Stark, 2011), and neuropsychological studies with memory-impaired patients (Duff et al., 2012) have confirmed that the hippocampus is involved in pattern separation processes, consistent with the predictions of computational models. There is also a large body of literature demonstrating a role of the rodent hippocampus in pattern completion for spatial locations (Gold & Kesner, 2005; Kirwan, Gilbert, & Kesner, 2005) and contextual fear conditioning (Matus-Amat, Higgins, Barrientos, & Rudy, 2004; Rudy & O’Reilly, 1999). The CLS model predicts that damage to the hippocampus should lead to a deficit in pattern separation and greater susceptibility to inter-item interference and an increased likelihood of mistakenly identifying related lures as having been previously encountered (due to intact MTL cortex-mediated pattern completion).

    • Impaired conditioned emotional response and object recognition are concomitant to neuronal damage in the amygdala and perirhinal cortex in middle-aged ischemic rats

      2011, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of interest, epileptiform EEG activity in the CA1/subicular region, the perirhinal cortex, and the prefrontal cortex lasting several hours was recorded following a 15 min global ischemia in rats, a factor that could contribute to post ischemic cellular dysfunction or degeneration in this brain area [14]. Nonetheless, although the contribution of perirhinal damage in item recognition is recognized, recollection needed to solve the task likely involves hippocampal damage [11], which also may have played a role in reduced detection of a mismatch between the context of familiarization and that of the test (i.e., introduction of a second object in the testing environment acting as novel contextual information) [39,71]. In the current study, recognition impairments at the 30 min retention interval may reflect working memory (WM) deficits.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text