Attentional modulation of background connectivity between ventral visual cortex and the medial temporal lobe

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2016.06.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Attention increases coupling of visual areas that process task-relevant information.

  • May explain how information is prioritized for processing in medial temporal lobe.

  • Visual cortex connects to PHC when scenes attended and to PRC when faces attended.

  • Switching of background connectivity most pronounced for unselective visual voxels.

  • Candidate mechanism for how attention can influence learning and memory behavior.

Abstract

Attention prioritizes information that is most relevant to current behavioral goals. This prioritization can be accomplished by amplifying neural responses to goal-relevant information and by strengthening coupling between regions involved in processing this information. Such modulation occurs within and between areas of visual cortex, and relates to behavioral effects of attention on perception. However, attention also has powerful effects on learning and memory behavior, suggesting that similar modulation may occur for memory systems. We used fMRI to investigate this possibility, examining how visual information is prioritized for processing in the medial temporal lobe (MTL). We hypothesized that the way in which ventral visual cortex couples with MTL input structures will depend on the kind of information being attended. Indeed, visual cortex was more coupled with parahippocampal cortex when scenes were attended and more coupled with perirhinal cortex when faces were attended. This switching of MTL connectivity was more pronounced for visual voxels with weak selectivity, suggesting that connectivity might help disambiguate sensory signals. These findings provide an initial window into an attentional mechanism that could have consequences for learning and memory.

Introduction

Attention during encoding enhances subsequent recognition memory and can modulate activity in regions of the medial temporal lobe (MTL) that support such memory (Carr et al., 2013, Dudukovic et al., 2011, Uncapher and Rugg, 2009, Yi and Chun, 2005). The purpose of the current study was to investigate a particular way in which attention might enhance MTL processing, inspired by studies about how attention modulates the visual system. Specifically, top-down attention has been shown to modulate the coupling between visual areas, strengthening functional connectivity between areas that code for attended information (Al-Aidroos et al., 2012, Bosman et al., 2012). By establishing such functional pathways, attention may improve the transmission of task-relevant information (Fries, 2005).

If attention modulates coupling at the highest levels of the visual hierarchy, this mechanism could also prioritize which information is transmitted to the MTL and ultimately the hippocampus. Parahippocampal cortex (PHC) and perirhinal cortex (PRC) provide an interface between the visual system and the hippocampus and thus are good targets for evaluating attentional modulation of functional connectivity. PHC and PRC have different functional characteristics (Eichenbaum et al., 2007, Ranganath and Ritchey, 2012): for example, PHC processes spatial and contextual information such as scenes, whereas PRC processes items, such as objects and faces (Davachi, 2006, Lee et al., 2012).

We thus manipulated selective attention to scenes and faces in composite images (Al-Aidroos et al., 2012, O’Craven et al., 1999, Yi and Chun, 2005), predicting that this would influence functional connectivity with PHC and PRC. Much of ventral visual cortex processes low- and mid-level features that are common to both scenes and faces (e.g., contours, colors, textures) and these areas might couple with distinct MTL regions depending on attention. In particular, we hypothesized that ventral visual cortex would show stronger functional connectivity with PHC during scene attention and with PRC during face attention.

To measure functional connectivity, we examined the correlation of BOLD activity over time between regions or voxels. This approach has long been used to uncover the coupling between brain regions during rest (Fox & Raichle, 2007). However, such measures can be confounded during tasks because regions that respond synchronously to stimuli will be spuriously correlated over time even in the absence of any interaction. There are several approaches for dealing with this issue (Friston et al., 1997, Rissman et al., 2004). Here we adopt a “background connectivity” approach in which stimulus-evoked responses and noise sources are projected out of the data and correlations are calculated in the residuals during different experimental conditions (Al-Aidroos et al., 2012, Duncan et al., 2014, Griffis et al., 2015, Norman-Haignere et al., 2012, Tompary et al., 2015). The resulting connectivity reflects spontaneous, intrinsic interactions within the functional networks engaged by each condition.

By comparing background connectivity across epochs in which attention was oriented to scenes vs. faces, we identified patterns of PHC and PRC connectivity selective to each attentional state. We predicted that areas of ventral visual cortex would show higher background connectivity both with PHC during scene attention and with PRC during face attention. Moreover, we predicted that such switching would be most pronounced for voxels in ventral visual cortex that responded robustly to both scenes and faces, as connectivity is needed in such cases to determine how the information conveyed by this activity will be processed (Fries, 2005). That is, the influence of voxels with unselective evoked activity in broader networks might arise from selective functional connectivity.

Section snippets

Participants

Twelve participants (7 females, ages 18–26), with normal or corrected-to-normal vision, participated for monetary compensation. The study was approved by the Princeton University Institutional Review Board and all participants provided informed consent.

Attention runs

Functional runs followed an on-off block design with 18 s of stimulation interleaved with 18 s of fixation. Stimulation blocks contained 12 face/scene composite stimuli selected pseudorandomly, presented sequentially for 1 s each separated by a

Behavioral performance

Participants were highly accurate on the one-back task, both when attending to scenes (mean A = 0.96, SD = 0.03; vs. chance (0.50): t(11) = 46.91, p < 0.0001) and when attending to faces (mean A = 0.95, SD = 0.04; t(11) = 43.11, p < 0.0001). Performance did not reliably differ between scene-attention and face-attention (t(11) = 1.15, p = 0.28). The hit rate across conditions was not at ceiling (mean = 0.84; SD = 0.10), suggesting that the task was demanding of attention.

Evoked activity in MTL ROIs

There was more activity in PHC (Fig. 2A) for

Discussion

There are at least two possible ways in which top-down attention could influence coupling between ventral visual cortex and MTL cortex, which are not mutually exclusive. The first way is that attention could operate on separate pathways that connect visual cortex to PHC and PRC, respectively. That is, attention to scenes may modulate PHC connectivity with certain visual regions and attention to faces may modulate PRC connectivity with other visual regions. This is consistent with the fact that

Acknowledgments

We thank Lila Davachi and Ken Norman for helpful suggestions. This work was supported by NIH Grants R01EY021755 and T32MH065214.

References (36)

  • N. Al-Aidroos et al.

    Top-down attention switches coupling between low-level and high-level areas of human visual cortex

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA

    (2012)
  • M. Aly et al.

    Attention stabilizes representations in the human hippocampus

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2016)
  • M. Aly et al.

    Attention promotes episodic encoding by stabilizing hippocampal representations

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA

    (2016)
  • C.A. Bosman et al.

    Attentional stimulus selection through selective synchronization between monkey visual areas

    Neuron

    (2012)
  • V.A. Carr et al.

    Top-down modulation of hippocampal encoding activity as measured by high-resolution functional MRI

    Neuropsychologia

    (2013)
  • L. Davachi

    Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology

    (2006)
  • N.M. Dudukovic et al.

    High-resolution fMRI reveals match enhancement and attentional modulation in the human medial temporal lobe

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (2011)
  • K. Duncan et al.

    Associative encoding and retrieval are predicted by functional connectivity in distinct hippocampal area CA1 pathways

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2014)
  • B. Efron et al.

    Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy

    Statistical Science

    (1986)
  • H. Eichenbaum et al.

    The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory

    Annual Review of Neuroscience

    (2007)
  • M.D. Fox et al.

    Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience

    (2007)
  • P. Fries

    A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: Neuronal communication through neuronal coherence

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences

    (2005)
  • K.J. Friston et al.

    Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging

    NeuroImage

    (1997)
  • G.G. Gregoriou et al.

    Long-range neural coupling through synchronization with attention

    Progress in Brain Research

    (2009)
  • J.C. Griffis et al.

    Retinotopic patterns of background connectivity between V1 and fronto-parietal cortex are modulated by task demands

    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

    (2015)
  • A.Z. Harris et al.

    Long-range neural synchrony in behavior

    Annual Review of Neuroscience

    (2015)
  • R. Insausti et al.

    MR volumetric analysis of the human entorhinal, perirhinal, and temporopolar cortices

    AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology

    (1998)
  • I. Kahn et al.

    Distinct cortical anatomy linked to subregions of the medial temporal lobe revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2008)
  • Cited by (21)

    • How functional network connectivity changes as a result of lesion and recovery: An investigation of the network phenotype of stroke

      2020, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      The vast majority of FC studies have analyzed resting-state data while task-based fMRI has been used either for analyses of local BOLD activation or for connectivity analyses focused on pre-defined ROIs and specific networks. In this study we used task-based fMRI to analyze “background connectivity” (the residual of the task-based GLM; see Norman-Haignere et al., 2011; Al-Aidroos et al., 2012, also more recently Cordova et al., 2016 and Tompary et al., 2018) to evaluate brain-wide FC. As we have indicated earlier, studies examining the relationship between RS-FC and task-based FC have concluded that background connectivity has many of the properties observed in RS-FC but also includes task-specific components (Fair et al., 2007; Cole et al., 2014; Gratton et al., 2016 see also, Norman-Haignere et al., 2011; Al-Aidroos et al., 2012).

    • Task activations produce spurious but systematic inflation of task functional connectivity estimates

      2019, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      This suggests that the relative accuracy of the HRF shape matters. A standard approach for empirically determining the correct HRF shape for task regression is finite impulse response (FIR) modeling (Cordova et al., 2016; Fair et al., 2007; Norman-Haignere et al., 2012). This involves including a binary regressor for every time point in the task event/block (Fig. 4A) and using the residual time series, which is virtually identical to simply subtracting the mean evoked response (see Figs. 1C and 2I).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text