Opinion
Saccades and shifting receptive fields: anticipating consequences or selecting targets?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.10.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We discuss the degree to which previous studies, both electrophysiological and psychophysical in monkeys and humans, provide unambiguous evidence for predictive remapping, or are in accordance with a convergent shift of receptive fields (RFs.)

  • We discuss the role of dynamic attentional deployments to saccadic targets and their possible relationship to convergent RF shifts in the context of perceptual stability and spatial distortions across eye movements.

  • We highlight outstanding questions and predictions for future research to foster our understanding of perisaccadic phenomena and perceptual stability.

Saccadic eye movements cause frequent and substantial displacements of the retinal image, but those displacements go unnoticed. It has been widely assumed that this perceived stability emerges from the shifting of visual receptive fields from their current, presaccadic locations to their future, postsaccadic locations in anticipation of the retinal consequences of saccades. Although evidence consistent with this anticipatory remapping has accumulated over the years, more recent work suggests an alternative view. In this opinion article, we examine the evidence of presaccadic receptive field shifts and their relationship to the perceptual changes that accompany saccades. We argue that both reflect the selection of targets for saccades rather than the anticipation of a displaced retinal image.

Section snippets

Predictive remapping in nonhuman primates

Humans and other primates constantly redirect their gaze in order to scan their environment. This behavior is necessary to overcome the lack of high acuity vision in the visual periphery, and is largely achieved via saccades (see Glossary). Saccades ultimately lead to the foveation of important visual stimuli, and thus allow the brain to process fine spatial details contained within those targets. However, saccades not only lead to fast sweeps of the retinal image (motion), but also introduce

Predictive remapping in humans

The first evidence of predictive remapping in human observers utilized an orientation adaptation technique and demonstrated a saccade dependent change in the resulting tilt after-effect (TAE) (Figure 3) [15]. The TAE is usually strongest if probed at the same retinocentric location where it was previously induced by an adapter stimulus. However, it was demonstrated that the TAE decreased gradually at the present, presaccadic location of the adaptor and simultaneously increased at the future,

Shifts of spatial attention prior to saccades

As previously mentioned (Box 2), a good deal of evidence indicates that spatial attention shifts to the saccade target prior to a saccade [18]. In one of the earlier psychophysical studies [19], human observers had to discriminate visual stimuli while simultaneously preparing and executing saccades to one of several locations. The authors found that discrimination performance was superior if the visual stimulus was presented at the location of the impending saccade, compared to performance at

Anticipatory remapping of attentional pointers

Evidence for predictive remapping has primarily been found in structures involved in the control of saccades, specifically, area LIP, the SC, and the FEF. Furthermore, LIP, the SC, and, particularly, the FEF (see Box 3) have been implicated in the control of visuospatial attention, and all three areas exhibit properties suggesting they each contain a ‘priority map’ [33], in which peaks of activity point to physically salient and/or behaviorally relevant stimuli. Recently [34], it was postulated

Concluding remarks and future directions

We have discussed the evidence of RF shifts during the preparation of saccadic eye movements. Thus far, this evidence suggests that previous observations of predictive remapping may be explained instead by a convergence of RFs toward the targets of saccades. The apparent convergence of RFs seems to be in accordance with other neurophysiological and psychophysical evidence of a predominant role of saccadic targets in vision 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52. However, future experiments will be

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant EY014924.

Glossary

Compression of visual space
a visual illusion occurring around the time of saccades. Briefly presented stimuli are perceptually mislocalized closer to saccade targets. This phenomenon might be related to gain modulation induced distortions of neuronal population responses.
Focus of convergence
point in retinocentric coordinates to which receptive fields shift. Here, each point of convergence may simultaneously reflect a peak in gain modulation of neuronal responses, in the probability of a

References (80)

  • B.P. Klein

    Attraction of position preference by spatial attention throughout human visual cortex

    Neuron

    (2014)
  • J.H. Fecteau et al.

    Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2006)
  • P. Cavanagh

    Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2010)
  • H. Deubel

    Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement

    Vision Res.

    (1996)
  • M. Kaiser et al.

    Perisaccadic mislocalization orthogonal to saccade direction

    Neuron

    (2004)
  • M. Zirnsak

    The spatial distribution of receptive field changes in a model of peri-saccadic perception: predictive remapping and shifts towards the saccade target

    Vision Res.

    (2010)
  • M. Carrasco

    Visual attention: the past 25 years

    Vision Res.

    (2011)
  • G. Rizzolatti

    Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention

    Neuropsychologia

    (1987)
  • A.R. Hunt et al.

    Covert and overt voluntary attention: linked or independent

    Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2003)
  • N.A. Steinmetz et al.

    Eye movement preparation modulates neuronal responses in area V4 when dissociated from attentional demands

    Neuron

    (2014)
  • S. Kastner

    Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation

    Neuron

    (1999)
  • C. Wardak

    A deficit in covert attention after parietal cortex inactivation in the monkey

    Neuron

    (2004)
  • R. Latto et al.

    Visual field defects after frontal eye-field lesions in monkeys

    Brain Res.

    (1971)
  • von Helmholtz, H. (1866/1911) A Treatise on Physiological Optics. Translated from the 3rd German ed. 1909-1911...
  • J.R. Duhamel

    The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements

    Science

    (1992)
  • M.F. Walker

    Neurons in the monkey superior colliculus predict the visual result of impending saccadic eye movements

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1995)
  • M.M. Umeno et al.

    Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. I. Predictive visual responses

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1997)
  • M.A. Sommer et al.

    Influence of the thalamus on spatial visual processing in frontal cortex

    Nature

    (2006)
  • K. Nakamura et al.

    Updating of the visual representation in monkey striate and extrastriate cortex during saccades

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2002)
  • W.M. Joiner

    Modulation of shifting receptive field activity in frontal eye field by visual salience

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2011)
  • S. Shin et al.

    Division of labor in frontal eye field neurons during presaccadic remapping of visual receptive fields

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2012)
  • K. Mirpour et al.

    Anticipatory remapping of attentional priority across the entire visual field

    J. Neurosci.

    (2012)
  • M. Zirnsak

    Visual space is compressed in prefrontal cortex before eye movements

    Nature

    (2014)
  • D. Melcher

    Predictive remapping of visual features precedes saccadic eye movements

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • U. Biber et al.

    Visual stability and the motion aftereffect: a psychophysical study revealing spatial updating

    PLoS ONE

    (2011)
  • M. Zirnsak

    Anticipatory saccade target processing and the presaccadic transfer of visual features

    J. Neurosci.

    (2011)
  • J.E. Hoffman et al.

    The role of attention in saccadic eye movements

    Percept. Psychophys.

    (1995)
  • C.J. McAdams et al.

    Attention to both space and feature modulates neuronal responses in macaque area V4

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2000)
  • B. Fischer et al.

    Enhanced activation of neurons in prelunate cortex before visually guided saccades of trained rhesus monkeys

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1981)
  • N.P. Bichot

    Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4

    Science

    (2005)
  • Cited by (69)

    • Spatiotemporal Content of Saccade Transients

      2020, Current Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      At the neural level, the sudden changes in the visual input caused by saccades tend to elicit strong responses at fixation onset in neurons at the early stages of the visual system [19–22]. Furthermore, phenomena associated with saccade preparation [23–26], as well as modulatory signals related to motor commands [27–30], have been observed. Despite the massive impact of saccades at both the perceptual and neural levels, relatively little attention has been paid to the information content of the luminance signals that these movements deliver to the retina.

    • Neural Circuits That Mediate Selective Attention: A Comparative Perspective

      2018, Trends in Neurosciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most research on forebrain attention networks focuses not on the mechanisms that generate selection signals, but rather on pathways that distribute selection signals and the mechanisms by which these signals regulate the quality of the selected information [4,7,60,61]. Effects on neural activity that correlate with attention include increases in neuronal sensitivity, gain, decorrelation of activity with neighboring neurons, periodic synchronization of activity both within a cortical area and across areas, and, at high levels of processing, dynamic shifts or sharpening of receptive field tuning (e.g., for location or feature values), resulting in the preferential representation of the attended stimulus [62–65]. At the same time, neuronal responses to distracting stimuli tend to be suppressed [66,67].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text