Trends in Neurosciences
Volume 41, Issue 10, October 2018, Pages 644-648
Journal home page for Trends in Neurosciences

Forum
Special Issue: Time in the Brain
Millisecond Spike Timing Codes for Motor Control

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.08.010Get rights and content

Millisecond variations in spiking patterns can radically alter motor behavior, suggesting that traditional rate-based theories of motor control require revision. The importance of spike timing in sensorimotor control arises from dynamic interactions between the nervous system, muscles, and the body. New mechanisms, model systems, and theories are revealing how these interactions shape behavior.

Section snippets

When a Millisecond Matters: Correlative and Causal Evidence

Correlative evidence that millisecond spike timing differences affect behavior has been shown across a wide range of species and behaviors. Mammalian motor units regularly exhibit doublets and triplets with inter-spike intervals of 5–10 ms; occurrences increase as muscles fatigue, presumably to increase force via central mechanisms [3]. Recent examples show that spike timing correlates with variations in both fast and slow periodic behaviors, or with selection of different behavioral programs (

Why a Millisecond Matters: Motor Codes Interact with System Biomechanics

Intuitively, it would seem that a millisecond could hardly affect muscle force output, as a spike elicits a 40–100 ms force twitch in mammalian striated muscles [3]. Nonetheless, at least three classes of mechanisms enable small timing changes to profoundly alter motor output in vivo: (i) muscle properties, (ii) mechanical feedback, and (iii) biomechanical sensitivities (Figure 1B).

A number of intrinsic muscle force-generating properties (Figure 1B, i) allow small differences in spike timing and

A Diversity, Not a Dichotomy, of Spike Codes

Recent computational, experimental, and analytical innovations emphasize the diversity of motor codes beyond the classic dichotomy of rate versus timing (Figure 2A); both sensory and motor timing codes can differ across many dimensions (Figure 2D). One crucial issue is whether sensory or motor information is encoded by the timing of individual spikes (‘single-spike code’), the relative timing of two spikes (‘inter-spike-interval code’), or more spikes (‘pattern code’). Furthermore, both rate

New Directions in Timing and the Motor System

Our growing appreciation of timing codes raises as many questions as it answers. One challenge is completeness. Most neural recordings sample a (very) limited subset of the signals involved in motor processing, and often from a single anatomical structure. Questions of timing and rate, consistency, and redundancy would benefit from comprehensive recordings of the motor code, especially with spike level resolution, to capture a more complete picture of the motor program. Spiking datasets

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH R01 NS084844 to SJS, NIH R01 EB022872 and NIH R01 NS099375 to SJS and IN, NIH R01 HD046922 and NIH R01 HD090642 to LHT, ARO W911NF-14-1-0396 and NSF CAREER PoLS 1554790 to SS. This work was done while LHT was visiting the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing, and in part when SJS, SNS, and IN were visiting the Aspen Center for Physics.

References (12)

  • A. Fairhall

    Information theoretic approaches to understanding circuit function

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (2012)
  • K.V. Shenoy

    Cortical control of arm movements: a dynamical systems perspective

    Annu. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2013)
  • S. Binder-Macleod et al.

    Catchlike property of skeletal muscle: recent findings and clinical implications

    Muscle Nerve

    (2005)
  • L.H. Ting et al.

    Chapter 12: Muscle, biomechanics, and implications for neural control

  • S. Sponberg et al.

    Abdicating power for control: a precision timing strategy to modulate function of flight power muscles

    Proc. Biol. Sci.

    (2012)
  • C. Tang

    Millisecond-scale motor encoding in a cortical vocal area

    PLoS Biol.

    (2014)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (51)

  • Cerebral: surface

    2022, Essential Neuromodulation
  • One-to-one innervation of vocal muscles allows precise control of birdsong

    2021, Current Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, the full range of force and fo step sizes varies between 0.85 and 126 μN and 50 mHz and 7.4 Hz, respectively. Both suboptimal spike rates or timing codes35 and lateral force transmission52,53 result in lower force production by individual MFs compared to maximal stress during isometric activation. Therefore, the minimal force and vocal feature steps presented here can be considered conservative estimates and are likely even smaller during song.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text