Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Closing in on rhombomere boundaries

Abstract

Eph receptors and their membrane-bound ephrin ligands are expressed in complementary segments of the hindbrain. Signalling between these receptors and ligands is sufficient to establish a sharp boundary between adjacent segments and to prevent cell mixing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Normal development of the hindbrain between three-somite (left) and fifteen-somite (right) stages.
Figure 2: Eph–ephrin interactions in the normal hindbrain and in experimental overexpression (data from ref. 4).

References

  1. Lumsden, A. & Keynes, R. Nature 337, 424–428 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Champagnat, J. & Fortin, G. Trends Neurosci. 20, 119–124 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fraser, S. E., Keynes, R. & Lumsden, A. Nature 344, 431–435 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu, Q., Mellitzer, G., Robinson, V. & Wilkinson, D. Nature 399, 267–271 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mellitzer, G., Xu, Q. & Wilkinson, D. Nature 400, 77–81 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lumsden, A. & Krumlauf, R. Science 274, 1109–1115 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guthrie, S. & Lumsden, A. Development 112, 221–229 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wizenmann, A. & Lumsden, A. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 448–459 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heyman, I., Kent, A. & Lumsden, A. Dev. Dyn. 198, 241–253 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, Q. & Wilkinson, D. J. Mol. Med. 75, 576–586 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Leary, D. D. M. & Wilkinson, D. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 65–73 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez, S., Geijo, E., Sanchez-Vives, M., Puelles, L. & Gallego, R. Development 116, 1069–1076 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steinberg, M. & Takeichi, M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 206–209 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Winning, R. S., Scales, J. B. & Sargent, T. D. Dev. Biol. 179, 309–319 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider-Maunoury, S. et al. Cell 75, 1199–1214 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moens, C. B., Yan, Y.-L., Appel, B., Force, A. & Kimmel, C. B. Development 122, 3981–3990 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lumsden, A. Closing in on rhombomere boundaries. Nat Cell Biol 1, E83–E85 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/12078

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/12078

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing