Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Scientific Correspondence
  • Published:

Perceptual bias for rising tones

Nature volume 395, pages 123–124 (1998)Cite this article

Abstract

An approaching sound source creates a pattern of rising intensity that can specify the arrival time of the source1,2,3. Here we found that listeners reliably overestimated the change in level of rising level tones relative to equivalent falling level tones. In a natural environment this overestimation could provide a selective advantage, because rising intensity can signal movement of the source towards an organism. The bias was stronger at higher levels, suggesting that rising loudness is even more critical when a sound source is either close or loud. These results suggest a privileged status of dynamic rising loudness for harmonic tones and an asymmetry in the neural coding of harmonic dynamic intensity change.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Perceived loudness change for each condition in each experiment.

References

  1. Shaw, B. K., McGowan, R. S. & Turvey, M. T. Ecol. Psychol. 3, 253–261 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, D. N., Vanderweel, F. R., Hitchcock, T., Matejowsky, E. & Pettigrew, J. D. J. Comp. Physiol. A 171, 563–571 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neuhoff, J. G. & McBeath, M. K. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22, 970–985 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Busnel, R. in Animal Communication (ed. Sebeok, T. A.) (Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington, 1968).

  5. Bregman, A. S. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994).

  6. Handel, S. in Hearing: Handbook of Perception and Cognition (ed. Moore, B. C. J.) (Academic, New York, 1995).

  7. Ashmead, D. H., Davis, D. L. & Northington, A. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform. 21, 256–269 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenblum, L. D., Carello, C. & Pastore, R. E. Perception 16, 175–186 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sugg, M. J. & Polich, J. Biol. Psychol. 41, 255–269 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burkard, R. & Moss, C. F. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 801–810 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Lafayette College, Easton, 18042-1781, Pennsylvania, USA

    John G. Neuhoff

Authors
  1. John G. Neuhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neuhoff, J. Perceptual bias for rising tones. Nature 395, 123–124 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/25862

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/25862

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing