Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape

Abstract

THEinformation about depth and three-dimensional shape available from the horizontal component of the stereo disparity field requires interpretation in conjunction with information about egocentric viewing distance (D). A novel computational approach for estimating D was proposed by Mayhew and Longuet-Higgins1,2, who demonstrated that the horizontal gradient of vertical disparities uniquely specifies the viewing distance. We have now used random dot stereograms in a shape judgement task to show that changes in vertical disparities have no effect on perceived three-dimensional shape. Changes in ocular convergence do alter perceived shape, suggesting substantial changes in the subjects' scaling of horizontal disparities. We conclude that vertical disparities are not used to scale disparities for viewing distance, and that extraretinal signals must be considered when analysing human three-dimensional shape perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mayhew, J. E. W. & Longuet-Higgins, H. C. Nature 297, 376–378 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayhew, J. E. W. Perception 11, 387–483 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bishop, P. O. Proc. R. Soc. B237, 445–469 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogle, K. N. Binocular Vision (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frisby, J. Nature 307, 592–593 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnston, E. B. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 29, 399 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnston, E. B. Vision Res. (in the press).

  8. Foley, J. M. Psychol. Rev. 87, 411–434 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Westheimer, G. Nature 307, 632–634 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koenderink, J. & van Doorn, A. Biol. Cybernt. 21, 755–764 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rogers, B. & Cagenello, R. Nature 339, 135–137 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cumming, B., Johnston, E. & Parker, A. Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape. Nature 349, 411–413 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/349411a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/349411a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing