Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking

Abstract

HOW does the human visual system 'bind' different fragments in the visual scene to create enduring representations of objects1–5? A visual illusion known as 'metacontrast'6–9 or backward masking provides compelling evidence that perception is not instantaneous and that it occurs sequentially in distinct stages. If a solid white target square is displayed for 50 ms in a tachistoscope, switched off, and followed by a 50 ms display of two flanking mask squares, remarkably, subjects report seeing only the two flanking squares: the first square is simply not 'seen'. By plotting the magnitude of masking as a function of the delay between the target and mask (the stimulus onset asynchrony), one can obtain a characteristic 'U'-shaped function7 with optimum masking occurring at about 50 ms, and no masking with synchronous target and mask presentations or at delays higher than 300 ms. The illusion is also highly sensitive to elementary stimulus dimensions such as colour, orientation and spatial frequency8, and it has been suggested10 that it is based on 'low level' autonomous visual mechanisms rather than cognitive processes. Here we describe a novel visual stimulus that demonstrates that metacontrast can be strongly modulated by 'top down' influences such as voluntary visual attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Treisman, A. Sci. Amer. 225, 114–126 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Crick, F. H. C. & Koch, C. Sem. Neurosci. 2, 263–275 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gray, C. M. & Singer, W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 1698–1702 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Damasio, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. & Brandt, S. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. 55, 1039–1067 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Finkel, L. & Saida, P. Amer. Sci. 82, 224–237 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stigler, R. Pflügers Archiv. 134, 365–435 (1910).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahneman, D. Psychol. Bulletin 62, 404–425 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams, M. C., Breitmeyer, B., Lovegrove, W. & Gutierrez, L. Vis. Res. 31, 2017–2023 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dennett, D. Consciousness Explained (Little, Brown, Boston, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Breitmeyer, B. & Ganz, L. Vis. Res. 17, 861–865 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cobb, S., Ramachandran, V. S. & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 20, 1667 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramachandran, V. S. & Anstis, S. M. Nature 304, 529–531 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramachandran, V. S. & Anstis, S. M. Scient. Am. 254, 102–109 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cavanagh, P. Science 257, 1563–1565 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moran, J. & Desimone, R. Science 229, 782–784 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Logotethis, N. & Schall, J. Science 245, 761–763 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. DiLollo, V., Bischof, W. F. & Dixon, P. Psychol. Sci. 4, 260–263 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramachandran, V., Cobb, S. Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking. Nature 373, 66–68 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/373066a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/373066a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing