Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Quantal-like current fluctuations induced by odorants in olfactory receptor cells

Abstract

MANY sensory systems have evolved signal detection capabilities that are limited only by the physical attributes of the stimulus1. For example, 'hair' cells of the inner ear can detect displacements of atomic dimensions2. Likewise, both in vertebrates and in invertebrates photoreceptors can detect a single photon3,4. The olfactory stimulus also has a quantal unit, the single odorant molecule. Insects are reportedly able to detect a single pheromone molecule5, whereas quantal responses in vertebrate olfactory receptor cells have not been reported yet. Psychophysical measurements indicate that a minimum of 50 odorant molecules are necessary for human olfactory detection, suggesting that an individual receptor may be activated by a single odorant molecule6. We report here measurements of current fluctuations induced by odorants that suggest a quantal event of about 0.3–1 pA, presumably triggered by the binding of a single odorant molecule.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Block, S. M. in Sensory Transduction (eds Coirey, D. P. & Roper, S. D.) 1–17 (Rockefeller Univ. Press, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crawford, A. C. & Fettiplace, R. J. Physiol. 364, 359–379 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baylor, D. A., Lamb, T. D. & Yau, K. W. J. Physiol. 288, 613–634 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fuortes, M. G. F. & Yeandle, S. J. gen. Physiol. 47, 443–463 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaissling, K. E. A. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 121–145 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Vries, H. L. & Stuiver, M. in Sensory Communication (ed. Rosenblith, W. A.) 159–167 (Wiley, New York, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Firestein, S., Picco, C. & Menini, A. J. Physiol. 468, 1–10 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleene, S. J. & Gesteland, R. C. J. Neurosci. 11, 3624–3629 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurahashi, T. & Yau, K. W. Nature 363, 71–74 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakamura, T. & Gold, G. H. Nature 325, 442–444 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zufall, F., Firestein, S. & Shepherd, G. M. J. Neurosci. 11, 3573–3580 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lamb, T. D. & Pugh, E. N. Trends Neurosci. 15, 291–298 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nunn, B. J. & Baylor, D. A. Nature 299, 726–728 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baylor, D. A., Nunn, B. J. & Schnapf, J. L. J. Physiol. 357, 575–607 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schnapf, J. L., Nunn, B. J., Meister, M. & Baylor, D. A., J. Physiol. 427, 681–713 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Trotier, D. Pflugers Arch. 407, 589–595 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Firestein, S. & Werblin, F. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 6292–6296 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurahashi, T. J. Physiol. 419, 177–192 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lynch, J. W. & Barry, P. H. Biophys. J. 55, 755–768 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menini, A., Picco, C. & Firestein, S. Quantal-like current fluctuations induced by odorants in olfactory receptor cells. Nature 373, 435–437 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/373435a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/373435a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing