Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Signal but not noise changes with perceptual learning

Abstract

Perceptual discrimination improves with practice. This ‘perceptual learning’ is often specific to the stimuli presented during training1,2,3,4,5, indicating that practice may alter the response characteristics of cortical sensory neurons6,7. Although much is known about how learning modifies cortical circuits8, it remains unclear how these changes relate to behaviour. Different theories assume that practice improves discrimination by enhancing the signal1,9,10, diminishing internal noise11,12 or both13. Here, to distinguish among these alternatives, we fashioned sets of faces and textures whose signal strength could be varied, and we trained observers to identify these patterns embedded in noise. Performance increased by up to 400% across several sessions over several days. Comparisons of human performance to that of an ideal discriminator showed that learning increased the efficiency with which observers encoded task-relevant information. Observer response consistency, measured by a double-pass technique in which identical stimuli are shown twice in each experimental session14,15, did not change during training, showing that learning had no effect on internal noise. These results indicate that perceptual learning may enhance signal strength, and provide important constraints for theories of learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Faces and their noise masking functions.
Figure 2: Band-pass texture patterns and their noise masking functions.
Figure 3: Calculation efficiency and internal noise estimates.
Figure 4: Response consistency in high and low external noise.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Poggio,T., Fahle,M. & Edelman,S. Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. Science 256, 1018–1021 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fiorentini,A. & Berardi,N. Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency. Nature 287, 43–4 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fahle,M. & Morgan,M. No transfer of perceptual learning between similar stimuli in the same retinal position. Curr. Biol. 6, 292–297 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ball,K. & Sekuler,R. Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination. Vis. Res. 27, 953–965 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sagi,D. & Tanne,D. Perceptual learning: learning to see. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4, 195–199 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Karni,A. & Sagi,D. Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 4966–4970 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vogels,R. & Orban,G. A. The effect of practice on the oblique effect in line orientation judgments. Vis. Res. 25, 1679–1687 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Buonomano,D. & Merzenich,M. Cortical placticity: From synapses to maps. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 149–186 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mackintosh,N. Conditioning and Associative Learning (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weiss,Y., Edelman,S. & Fahle,M. Models of perceptual learning in vernier hyperacuity. Neural Comp. 5, 695–718 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McLaren,I., Kaye,H. & Mackintosh,N. in Parallel Distributed Processing: Implications for Psychology and Neurobiology (ed. Morris, R.) 102–130 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. McLaren,I. in Causal Mechanisms of Behavioural Development (eds Hogan, J. & Bolhuis, J.) 377–402 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Dosher,B. A. & Lu,Z. Perceptual learning reflects external noise filtering and internal noise reduction through channel reweighting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13988–13993 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Green,D. M. Consistency of auditory detection judgments. Psychol. Rev. 71, 392–407 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burgess,A. E. & Colborne,B. Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 617–627 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tjan,B. S., Braje,W. L., Legge,G. E. & Kersten,D. Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise. Vis. Res. 35, 3053–3069 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Legge,G., Kersten,D. & Burgess,A. E. Contrast discrimination in noise. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 391–406 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pelli,D. G. in Vision: Coding and Efficiency (ed. Blakemore, C.) 3–24 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Burgess,A. E., Wagner,R. F., Jennings,R. J. & Barlow,H. B. Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. Science 214, 93–94 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Desimone,R. Face-selective cells in the temporal cortex of monkeys. J. Cog. Neurosci. 3, 1–8 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yin,R. K. Looking at upside-down faces. J. Exp. Psychol. 81, 141–145 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tolhurst,D. J., Movshon,J. A. & Dean,A. F. The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey cortex. Vis. Res. 23, 775–785 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. van Meeteren,A. & Barlow,H. B. The statistical efficiency for detecting sinusoidal modulation of average dot density in random figures. Vis. Res. 21, 765–777 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zohary,E., Celebrini,S., Britten,K. H. & Newsome,W. T. Neuronal plasticity that underlies improvement in perceptual performance. Science 263, 1289–1292 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Logothetis,N. K., Pauls,J. & Poggio,T. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Curr. Biol. 5, 552–563 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pascual-Leone,A. & Torres,F. Plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex representation of the reading finger in Braille readers. Brain 116, 39–52 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Recanzone,G. H., Schreiner,C. E. & Merzenich,M. M. Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys. J. Neurosci. 13, 87–103 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schiltz,C. et al. Neuronal mechanisms of perceptual learning: changes in human brain activity with training in orientation discrimination. Neuroimage 9, 46–62 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McIntosh,A. R., Rajah,M. N. & Lobaugh,N. J. Interactions of prefrontal cortex in relation to awareness in sensory learning. Science 284, 1531–1533 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gold,J., Bennett,P. J. & Sekuler,A. B. Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers. Vis. Res. 39, 3537–3560 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by grants to P.J.B. and A.B.S. from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank R. Sekuler for comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. J. Bennett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gold, J., Bennett, P. & Sekuler, A. Signal but not noise changes with perceptual learning. Nature 402, 176–178 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/46027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/46027

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing