Abstract
Metacontrast masking occurs when the visibility of a brief target stimulus is decreased by the subsequent appearance of another nearby visual stimulus. Early explanations of the phenomenon involved low-level mechanisms, but subsequent studies have suggested a role for selective attention. The results of three experiments presented here extend previous findings to the metacontrast paradigm. It is shown that the strength of metacontrast masking increases with the number of distractor items in a display, decreases when the target location is validly but not invalidly precued, and is eliminated when search for the target is efficient (pop-out search) but not when search is inefficient (serial search). A connection between metacontrast masking and object substitution masking is considered.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Averbach, E., &Coriell, A. S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision.Bell System Technical Journal,40, 309–328.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984).Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Breitmeyer, B. [G.], Brown, V., Carter, M., &Havig, P. (2000). Benefits and costs of attentional allocation in metacontrast.Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society,5, 86–87.
Breitmeyer, B. G., &Ganz, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing.Psychological Review,83, 1–36.
Chellazi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J., &Desimone, R. (1993). A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex.Nature,363, 345–347.
Di Lollo, V., Bischof, W. F., &Dixon, P. (1993). Stimulus-onset asynchrony is not necessary for motion perception or metacontrast masking.Psychological Science,4, 260–263.
Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: Psychophysics of reentrant pathways.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 481–507.
Enns, J. T., &Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations.Psychological Science,8, 135–139.
Eriksen, C. W., &Rohrbaugh, J. W. (1970a). Some factors determining eff iciency of selective attention.American Journal of Psychology,83, 330–342.
Eriksen, C. W., &Rohrbaugh, J. W. (1970b). Visual masking in multielement displays.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 147–154.
Fehrer, E., &Biederman, I. (1962). A comparison of reaction and verbal report in the detection of masked stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology,64, 126–130.
Finley, G. (1985). A high-speed point plotter for vision research.Vision Research,25, 1993–1997.
Mack, A., &Rock, I. (1998).Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Michaels, C. F., &Turvey, M. T. (1979). Central sources of visual masking: Indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance.Psychological Research,41, 1–61.
Moran, J., &Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex.Science,229, 782–784.
Nakayama, K., &Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention.Vision Research,29, 1631–1647.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ramachandran, V. I., &Cobb, S. (1995). Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking.Nature,373, 66–68.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. S., &Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression in visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 653–662.
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., &Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science,8, 368–373.
Shelley-Tremblay, J., &Mack, A. (1999). Metacontrast masking and attention.Psychological Science,10, 508–515.
Simons, D. J., &Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1, 261–267.
Spencer, T. J., &Shuntich, R. (1970). Evidence for an interruption theory of backward masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology,85, 198–203.
Stigler, R. (1910). Chronophotische Studien über den Umgebungskontrast.Pflügers Archiv für die Gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere,135, 365–435.
Tata, M., &Giaschi, D. (1999). Selective attention to the mask modulates object substitution masking.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,40, S806.
Teller, D. (1990). The domain of visual science. In L. Spillmann & J. S. Werner (Eds.),Visual perception: The neurophysiological foundations (Vol. 10, pp. 11–21). New York: Academic Press.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A. M., &Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 285–310.
Uttal, W. R. (1970). On the physiological basis of masking with dotted visual noise.Perception & Psychophysics,7, 321–327.
Weisstein, N., Ozog, G., &Szoc, R. (1975). A comparison and elaboration of two models of metacontrast.Psychological Review,82, 325–343.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 414–433.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was done in partial fulfillment of the MSc degree to the author under the supervision of D. Giaschi. Funding was provided by NSERC Grant OGPO194526 to D. Giaschi and NSERC Grant OGP0006592 to V. Di Lollo.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tata, M.S. Attend to it now or lose it forever: Selective attention, metacontrast masking, and object substitution. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 1028–1038 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194754
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194754