Abstract
A considerable number of studies have recently used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the mechanisms underlying error processing. Nevertheless, how these mechanisms are associated with behavioral adjustments following errors remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated how posterror slowing is linked to outcome expectations and error feedback. We used an adaptive four-choice reaction time task to manipulate outcome expectancy. Behaviorally, the results show posterror slowing when errors are unexpected and postcorrect slowing when correct responses are unexpected, indicating that outcome expectancy is crucial for posterror slowing. ERP analyses revealed that the error-related negativity and the feedback-related negativity were not correlated with the behavioral reaction time pattern, whereas the P3 was. The results support the hypothesis that posterror slowing is caused by attentional orienting to unexpected events.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernat, E. M., Hall, J. R., Steffen, B. V., & Patrick, C. J. (2007). Violent offending predicts P300 amplitude. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 66, 161–167.
Beste, C., Willemssen, R., Saft, C., & Falkenstein, M. (2009). Error processing in normal aging and in basal ganglia disorders. Neuroscience, 159, 143–149.
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.
Brown, J. W., & Braver, T. S. (2005). Learned predictions of error likelihood in the anterior cingulate cortex. Science, 307, 1118–1121.
Carp, J., & Compton, R. J. (2009). Alpha power is influenced by performance errors. Psychophysiology, 46, 336–343.
Cavanagh, J. F., Cohen, M. X., & Allen, J. J. B. (2009). Prelude to and resolution of an error: EEG phase synchrony reveals cognitive control dynamics during action monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 98–105.
Coles, M. G. H., Scheffers, M. K., & Holroyd, C. B. (2001). Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing. Biological Psychology, 56, 173–189.
Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., Fiehler, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Engel, A. K. (2005). Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11730–11737.
Endrass, T., Reuter, B., & Kathmann, N. (2007). ERP correlates of conscious error recognition: Aware and unaware errors in an antisaccade task. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 1714–1720.
Eppinger, B., Kray, J., Mock, B., & Mecklinger, A. (2008). Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN. Neuropsychologia, 46, 521–539.
Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Christ, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (2000). ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: A tutorial. Biological Psychology, 51, 87–107.
Frank, M. J., Woroch, B. S., & Curran, T. (2005). Error-related negativity predicts reinforcement learning and conflict biases. Neuron, 47, 495–501.
Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355–373.
Gehring, W. J., & Fencsik, D. E. (2001). Functions of the medial frontal cortex in the processing of conflict and errors. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 9430–9437.
Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1993). A neural system for error-detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4, 385–390.
Gehring, W. J., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 516–520.
Hajcak, G., Holroyd, C. B., Moser, J. S., & Simons, R. F. (2005). Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. Psychophysiology, 42, 161–170.
Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., & Simons, R. F. (2003). To err is autonomic: Error-related brain potentials, ANS activity, and post-error compensatory behavior. Psychophysiology, 40, 895–903.
Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Holroyd, C. B., & Simons, R. F. (2006). The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biological Psychology, 71, 148–154.
Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Holroyd, C. B., & Simons, R. F. (2007). It’s worse than you thought: The feedback negativity and violations of subject expectancy. Psychophysiology, 44, 905–912.
Hajcak, G., & Simons, R. F. (2008). Oops!. . . I did it again: An ERP and behavioral study of double-errors. Brain & Cognition, 68, 15–21.
Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the errorrelated negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679–709.
Holroyd, C. B., & Krigolson, O. E. (2007). Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task. Psychophysiology, 44, 913–917.
Holroyd, C. B., Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential. NeuroReport, 14, 2481–2484.
Intriligator, J. M., & Polich, J. (1995). On the relationship between EEG and ERP variability. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 20, 59–74.
Kok, A. (1978). Effect of warning stimulus novelty on p300 and components of contingent negative-variation. Biological Psychology, 6, 219–233.
Krigolson, O. E., & Holroyd, C. B. (2006). Evidence for hierarchical error processing in the human brain. Neuroscience, 137, 13–17.
Laming, D. R. J. (1968). Information theory of choice reaction times. New York: Academic Press.
Laming, D. R. J. (1979). Autocorrelation of choice-reaction times. Acta Psychologica, 43, 1381–1412.
Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression-analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149–157.
Luu, P., Collins, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2000). Mood, personality, and self-monitoring: Negative affect and emotionality in relation to frontal lobe mechanisms of error monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 43–60.
Luu, P., Shane, M., Pratt, N. L., & Tucker, D. M. (2009). Corticolimbic mechanisms in the control of trial and error learning. Brain Research, 1247, 100–113.
Marco-Pallares, J., Camara, E., Münte, T. F., & Rodríguez-Fornells, A. (2008). Neural mechanisms underlying adaptive actions after slips. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1595–1610.
Mathalon, D. H., Fedor, M., Faustman, W. O., Gray, M., Askari, N., & Ford, J. M. (2002). Response-monitoring dysfunction in schizophrenia: An event-related brain potential study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 22–41.
McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1981). A metric for thought: A comparison of p300 latency and reaction-time. Science, 211, 77–80.
Miltner, W. H. R., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G. H. (1997). Eventrelated brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a “generic” neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 788–798.
Modirrousta, M., & Fellows, L. K. (2008). Dorsal medial prefrontal cortex plays a necessary role in rapid error prediction in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 14000–14005.
Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). Decision making, the p3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 510–532.
Nieuwenhuis, S., Gilzenrat, M. S., Holmes, B. D., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). The role of the locus coeruleus in mediating the attentional blink: A neurocomputational theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 291–307.
Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Blow, J., Band, G. P. H., & Kok, A. (2001). Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: Evidence from an antisaccade task. Psychophysiology, 38, 752–760.
Nieuwenhuis, S., Schweizer, T. S., Mars, R. B., Botvinick, M. M., & Hajcak, G. (2007). Error-likelihood prediction in the medial frontal cortex: A critical evaluation. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1570–1581.
Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Post-error slowing: An orienting account. Cognition, 111, 275–279.
Oliveira, F. T. P., McDonald, J. J., & Goodman, D. (2007). Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate is not all error related: Expectancy deviation and the representation of action-outcome associations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1994–2004.
Polich, J. (2003). Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b. In J. Polich (Ed.), Detection of change: Event-related potential and fMRI findings (pp. 83–98). Boston: Kluwer.
Polich, J. (2007). Updating p300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128–2148.
Polich, J., & Hoffman, L. D. (1997a). Alzheimer’s disease and P300: Evaluation of modality and task difficulty. Paper presented at the III Pan-Pacific Conference on Brain Topography (BTOPPS III), Tokyo Bay, Japan.
Polich, J., & Hoffman, L. D. (1997b). P300 and handedness: On the possible contribution of corpus callosal size to ERPs. Psychophysiology, 35, 497–507.
Rabbitt, P. M. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264–272.
Rabbitt, P. M., & Rodgers, B. (1977). What does a man do after he makes an error? An analysis of response programming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 727–743.
Riba, J., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Morte, A., Münte, T. F., & Barbanoj, M. J. (2005). Noradrenergic stimulation enhances human action monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 4370–4374.
Riba, J., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Münte, T. F., & Barbanoj, M. J. (2005). A neurophysiological study of the detrimental effects of alprazolam on human action monitoring. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 554–565.
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ramautar, J. R., & Wijnen, J. G. (2009). To P-E or not to P-E: A P3-like ERP component reflecting the processing of response errors. Psychophysiology, 46, 531–538.
Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Kurzbuch, A. R., & Münte, T. F. (2002). Time course of error detection and correction in humans: Neurophysiological evidence. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 9990–9996.
Sato, A., Yasuda, A., Ohira, H., Miyawaki, K., Nishikawa, M., Kumano, H., et al. (2005). Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300. NeuroReport, 16, 407–411.
Stemmer, B., Segalowitz, S. J., Dywan, J., Panisset, M., & Melmed, C. (2007). The error negativity in nonmedicated and medicated patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 1223–1229.
Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It’s not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 467–472.
Ullsperger, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). How does error correction differ from error signaling? An event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1105, 102–109.
Vidal, F., Hasbroucq, T., Grapperon, J., & Bonnet, M. (2000). Is the “error negativity” specific to errors? Biological Psychology, 51, 109–128.
West, R., & Travers, S. (2008). Tracking the temporal dynamics of updating cognitive control: An examination of error processing. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1112–1124.
Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111, 931–959.
Yeung, N., Holroyd, C. B., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 535–544.
Yeung, N., & Sanfey, A. G. (2004). Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 6258–6264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a doctoral grant from the Ghent University special research fund (BOF 07/DOS/011), Ghent University GOA program (BOF08/GOA/011), and the Belgian Science Policy, Interuniversity Attraction Poles program (P6/29).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castellar, E.n., Kühn, S., Fias, W. et al. Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP support. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 10, 270–278 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.2.270
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.2.270