We investigated whether posture - either seated (S) or upright standing (O, orthostatic) - affects the vestibular perceptions of angular velocity (V) and displacement (D) in the horizontal plane. We also examined whether the two perceptions are equivalent, that is, whether perceived displacement can be viewed as the time integral of perceived velocity. Sinusoidal stimuli were delivered to subjects sitting on a Barany chair or standing on a turning platform. Frequencies ranged from 0.028 Hz to 0.45 Hz, peak-to-peak amplitudes from 11.3 degrees to 180 degrees, and peak velocities from 4 degrees/s to 64 degrees/s. Perceptions were measured by retrospective magnitude estimation in relation to a standard stimulus (STD) of 0.11 Hz, 45 degrees, 16 degrees/s. For D-estimates, two different moduli were assigned to the STD: Either "45 degrees" (allowing subjects to use the familiar degree scale, which can easily be related to the body scheme) or "10" (which bears no relation to an accustomed scale). For V-estimations the modulus was always "10" (there is no "natural" velocity scale). D-estimates exhibited only a marginal, non-significant dependence on posture (S larger than O); they were highly veridical (linear function of stimulus amplitude, gain close to 1) when subjects used the degree scale but had a reduced gain (approximately 0.76) with a modulus of 10. V-estimates, on the other hand, varied with posture (S significantly larger than O), particularly upon presentation of large stimuli; also, they deviated increasingly from veracity as stimulus magnitude increased (saturating function). Finally, posture had no effect upon the vestibular detection threshold. The frequency response of D-estimates, tested with stimuli of constant amplitude and varying frequency, was bimodal at low frequencies: stimuli were either not detected at all or were veridically estimated, on average (with a large scatter, though). The frequency response of V-estimates, tested with stimuli of constant peak velocity, exhibited a continuous increase with stimulation frequency. We conclude that published quantifications of vestibular self-motion perception, collected mostly with sitting subjects, are likely to be applicable also to the more natural situation of standing subjects provided they are based on displacement indications; in contrast, velocity indications appear to be modulated by posture. The different susceptibility of displacement and velocity estimates to posture and their incongruent frequency characteristics suggest that perceived displacement does not, or does not always, equal the time integral of perceived velocity. The persistence of nearly veridical displacement estimates at low frequencies suggests the intervention of cognitive processes.