The contention is examined that the oblique effect, i.e., the well-known performance deficit in detecting orientation difference in oblique lines as compared to vertical and horizontal ones, has its origin in a relative deficiency of neurons with obliquely-oriented receptive fields in the primary visual cortex. Psychophysical observations demonstrate a prominent oblique effect also in visual tasks involving widely-separated elements and other stimuli that would elicit little or no response in oriented neurons in the visual cortex. Conversely, some tasks, e.g. position discrimination, exhibit no oblique effect even with short, high-contrast lines. When the comparison with the reference can be accomplished during a single brief exposure rather than sequential ones, thresholds for orientation differences between adjacent contours in oblique meridians are also elevated compared to those in the vertical and horizontal, but to a lesser extent. In one particular texture discrimination task some but not all observers have a conspicuous oblique effect. The discrimination only of the direction of streaming random dots, not of their speed, is poorer for motions in oblique meridians. The findings imply that the neural locus for the oblique effect is more central than the primary visual cortex.