Repetition blindness (RB) is the failure to report a visual stimulus presented shortly after a first occurrence of the same stimulus (Kanwisher, 1987). A similar phenomenon is that visual extinction, the failure to identify a contralesional stimulus presented simultaneously with an ipsilesional stimulus, increases with increasing similarity between the contralesional and ipsilesional stimulus (Baylis, Driver, & Rafal, 1993). We report a patient who, after a right parietal stroke, presented increased extinction for letters in repeated (e.g., A + A) than in unrepeated (e.g., T + U) displays. Increased extinction due to RB was observed in all experimental conditions probing item identification and varied between 5.4% and 40.6% across conditions. RB was unaffected by temporal modulation of the display, but was significantly reduced when stimuli grouped by a surrounding contour. Identification of contralesional repeated and unrepeated letters could be enhanced by auditory cues presented prior to the visual display. These results suggest that perceptual processing of extinguished stimuli that are similar to the stimulus presented on the preserved side is relatively unimpaired, but that the patient fails to ascribe to the stimulus a separate identity, supporting the distinction between type recognition and token individuation (Kanwisher, 1987). The extinction patterns for similar and dissimilar stimuli indicate that competition for attentional selection does not only occur at low (perceptual) levels, but also at higher processing levels, suggesting the presence of attentional competition on different levels of analysis.