The neuroimaging signal is a linear sum of neurally distinct stimulus- and task-related components

Nat Neurosci. 2012 Sep;15(9):1298-306. doi: 10.1038/nn.3170. Epub 2012 Jul 29.

Abstract

Neuroimaging (for example, functional magnetic resonance imaging) signals are taken as a uniform proxy for local neural activity. By simultaneously recording electrode and neuroimaging (intrinsic optical imaging) signals in alert, task-engaged macaque visual cortex, we recently observed a large anticipatory trial-related neuroimaging signal that was poorly related to local spiking or field potentials. We used these same techniques to study the interactions of this trial-related signal with stimulus-evoked responses over the full range of stimulus intensities, including total darkness. We found that the two signals could be separated, and added linearly over this full range. The stimulus-evoked component was related linearly to local spiking and, consequently, could be used to obtain precise and reliable estimates of local neural activity. The trial-related signal likely has a distinct neural mechanism, however, and failure to account for it properly could lead to substantial errors when estimating local neural spiking from the neuroimaging signal.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Animals
  • Cerebrovascular Circulation / physiology
  • Conditioning, Operant
  • Cues
  • Darkness
  • Electrodes, Implanted
  • Electrophysiological Phenomena
  • Evoked Potentials / physiology
  • Fixation, Ocular / physiology
  • Hemodynamics
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Linear Models
  • Macaca mulatta
  • Nervous System Physiological Phenomena*
  • Neuroimaging / methods*
  • Neurophysiology*
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Visual Cortex / physiology