Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation

Elife. 2019 Feb 6:8:e37321. doi: 10.7554/eLife.37321.

Abstract

Decision bias is traditionally conceptualized as an internal reference against which sensory evidence is compared. Instead, we show that individuals implement decision bias by shifting the rate of sensory evidence accumulation toward a decision bound. Participants performed a target detection task while we recorded EEG. We experimentally manipulated participants' decision criterion for reporting targets using different stimulus-response reward contingencies, inducing either a liberal or a conservative bias. Drift diffusion modeling revealed that a liberal strategy biased sensory evidence accumulation toward target-present choices. Moreover, a liberal bias resulted in stronger midfrontal pre-stimulus 2-6 Hz (theta) power and suppression of pre-stimulus 8-12 Hz (alpha) power in posterior cortex. Alpha suppression in turn was linked to the output activity in visual cortex, as expressed through 59-100 Hz (gamma) power. These findings show that observers can intentionally control cortical excitability to strategically bias evidence accumulation toward the decision bound that maximizes reward.

Keywords: decision bias; drift diffusion modeling; electroencephalography; human; neural excitability; neural oscillations; neuroscience; perceptual decision-making.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Alpha Rhythm / physiology
  • Bias
  • Decision Making*
  • Electroencephalography
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Motor Activity / physiology
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Sensation*
  • Task Performance and Analysis
  • Theta Rhythm / physiology
  • Time Factors
  • Visual Cortex / physiology
  • Young Adult