Responses of saccade-depressed (SD) and saccade-excited (SE) cells in the striate cortex to eye movements of alert cats under presentation of a visual pattern were studied under reinforcement of the eye movements with rewards of water. These responses were compared to those on passive displacement of the visual pattern reproducing the movements of the retinal image occurring during eye movements while eye movements were suppressed by withdrawal of reinforcement. Passive displacement of the visual pattern produced in the SD cells depression closely resembled the depression occurring during eye movements under presentation of the visual pattern, in time course as well as in amplitude. Both the saccade depression and the depression due to passive movement of the visual pattern were nonselective to the direction of eye movements. Saccade excitation of the SE cells frequently contained two components occurring at 20 and 80 ms after the onsets of eye movements. Passive displacement of the visual pattern produced in the SE cells excitation comparable with the early component of the saccade excitation. These findings suggest that saccade depression in the SD cells and the early component of the saccade excitation in the SE cells are related to retinal reafference of eye movement. During presentation of visual patterns, saccade excitation in the SE cells was closely related to parameters of eye movements, such as direction, amplitude, duration, and velocity. The correlations were completely lost or strongly reduced in darkness. Lines of evidence were provided that the saccade excitation of the SE cells in darkness or the later component of the saccade excitation under presentation of a visual pattern represents efference copy signals of eye movement transferred to the striate cortex through the Clare-Bishop (CB) cortex. Excitation comparable with saccade excitation in darkness occurred in synchrony with activities of the oculomotor nuclei even after retrobulbar paralysis of eye movement, indicating that the excitation is related to efference copy signals rather than proprioceptive reafference of eye movement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)