Abstract
Neuronal excitability is likely to be regulated by the site of action potential initiation, the location on a neuron that crosses threshold first. Although initiation is axonal in many neurons, in Purkinje cells, somatic conductances can generate spontaneous action potentials, suggesting that the perisomatic region (soma and/or initial segment) contributes to spike initiation and may regulate firing. To identify directly the cellular regions at which Na channel modulation significantly influences firing, we measured spontaneous and evoked action potentials in Purkinje cells in cerebellar slices from postnatal day 14–28 mice while applying drugs locally to either the soma/initial segment or the first node of Ranvier. Na currents were decreased by tetrodotoxin (TTX) or increased by β-pompilidotoxin (β-PMTX). Dual somatic and axonal recordings indicated that spike thresholds and input–output curves were sensitive to TTX or β-PMTX at the perisomatic region but were unchanged by either drug at the first node. When perisomatic Na channel availability was reduced with subsaturating TTX, however, the input–output curve became shallower during additional TTX block of nodal channels, revealing a latent role for nodal Na channels in facilitating firing. In perisomatic TTX, axons failed to generate spontaneous or evoked spike trains. In contrast, choline block of the initial segment alone altered normal input–output curves. The data suggest that, although the first node reliably follows action potentials, spike initiation in Purkinje neurons occurs in the initial segment. Moreover, Purkinje cell output depends on the density, availability, and kinetics of perisomatic Na channels, a characteristic that may distinguish spontaneously firing from quiescent neurons.
Introduction
When a neuron fires, the membrane potential first crosses threshold at the initiation site, and the resulting action potential propagates to other regions of the cell. The responsiveness of a neuron to external stimuli, i.e., its input–output function, is therefore likely to be sensitive to any changes in the properties of the initiation site. In many cells, the initiation site is located in the axon, at or just beyond the initial segment (Coombs et al., 1957a,b; Moore and Westerfield, 1983; Moore et al., 1983; Colbert and Johnston, 1996; Colbert and Pan, 2002; Meeks et al., 2005). In cerebellar Purkinje neurons, direct recordings indicate that the axon hillock (7 μm from the base of the cell body) depolarizes before the soma (Stuart and Häusser, 1994), and recent evidence has suggested that initiation occurs more distally, at the first node of Ranvier (Clark et al., 2005).
In acutely isolated preparations, however, in which somata usually retain <10 μm of axon (approximately one-third of the initial segment), Purkinje neurons from both rats and mice fire spontaneously (Nam and Hockberger, 1997; Raman and Bean, 1999) at rates indistinguishable from those in slices (Häusser and Clark, 1997). Thus, at least under the extreme condition of axonal and dendritic cleavage, the perisomatic region (soma and initial segment) is capable of initiating spikes, raising the question of what the defining properties of an initiation site are, particularly in the special case of spontaneously firing neurons.
The ability of axons to initiate action potentials generally arises from their large net inward current relative to local capacitance, a trait achieved by a high Na channel density, low K channel density, relatively negative voltage of Na channel activation, and/or small membrane area (Coombs et al., 1957a,b; Moore and Westerfield, 1983; Moore et al., 1983; Stuart and Häusser, 1994; Colbert and Johnston, 1996; Colbert and Pan, 2002). With the exception of their large capacitance, Purkinje somata also satisfy these criteria. Somatic Na channel density is high (Stuart and Häusser, 1994; Raman and Bean, 1999), few K currents operate at subthreshold potentials (Raman and Bean, 1999; Southan and Robertson, 2000; Khaliq et al., 2003), and resurgent kinetics increase Na channel availability at interspike potentials (Raman and Bean, 1997, 2001). Whether Purkinje axons share these features is unknown, because direct recordings of axonal channels are still unfeasible.
On the premise that changing Na channel availability at the initiation site should influence neuronal excitability, we tested the roles of the soma, initial segment, and axon in spike initiation by pharmacologically modulating perisomatic or nodal Na currents of Purkinje neurons in cerebellar slices while measuring somatic and axonal action potentials. The gain of input–output curves and spike thresholds were highly sensitive to perisomatic but not nodal Na channel availability, whereas the distal axon reliably followed firing rates set by the perisomatic region. The results suggest that initiation occurs in the initial segment and that modulation of perisomatic Na channels changes firing rates, consistent with the active role of perisomatic conductances in generating spontaneous action potentials in Purkinje cells.
Materials and Methods
Slice preparation.
Cerebellar slices were prepared from either C57BL/6 or L7-GFP (C57BL/6 background) (Sekirnjak et al., 2003) mice on postnatal day 15 (P15) to P29 (mean of P21). When noted, experiments were done on Wistar rats, aged P36–P39. In accordance with institutional guidelines, animals were anesthetized with halothane and transcardially perfused with ice-cold (<4°C) artificial CSF (ACSF) (in mm: 123.75 NaCl, 3.5 KCl, 26 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, and 10 glucose) bubbled with 95% O2/5% CO2. After decapitation, cerebella were removed, and parasagittal slices (200 μm) were cut from the vermis on a vibratome (VT100S; Leica, Nussloch, Germany). Slices recovered for ≥1 h at 34°C in oxygenated ACSF. Recordings were made within 6 h of incubation. Except as noted, drugs were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO)
Electrophysiology.
Slices were perfused at 3–4 ml/min with oxygenated ACSF (33 ± 1°C) with 10 μm SR95531 [2-(3-carboxypropyl)-3-amino-6-(4-methoxyphenyl)pyridazinium bromide], 10 μm CPP [d(−)-3-(2-carboxypiperazine-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid], and 5 μm DNQX (Tocris Cookson, Ellsville, MO) to block GABAA, NMDA, and AMPA receptors. Cells were visualized on an Axioskop FS2 (Zeiss) with infrared differential interference contrast (IR-DIC) (C2400; Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ). Fast green was visualized with contrast enhancement under visible light. Somatic whole-cell recordings were made with borosilicate patch pipettes (3–4 MΩ; A-M Systems, Carlsborg, WA). The intracellular solution contained 120 mm KCH3SO3, 10 mm NaCl, 10 mm HEPES, 2 mm MgCl2, 1 mm EGTA, 0.066 mm Alexa Fluor 594 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and 0.3–4% biocytin, buffered with KOH to pH 7.35. Somatic recordings were made with an Axoclamp-2B amplifier in bridge mode, acquired at 50 kHz, and filtered at 10 kHz with pClamp 8.2 software (Molecular Devices, Palo Alto, CA). Capacitance was compensated and the bridge was balanced. Cells with series resistances >20 MΩ were discarded.
For axonal recordings (Khaliq and Raman, 2005), somatic whole-cell recordings were first established in cells in which the axon could be identified for >50 μm with IR-DIC. After allowing a cell to fill with Alexa Fluor 594 (∼15 min), the axonal recording location was generally selected under fluorescence from a monochronometer (T.I.L.L. Photonics, Gräfelfing, Germany) to confirm the identity of the axon in the corticonuclear tract. To limit phototoxicity, fluorescence was flashed at ∼3 Hz (150 ms pulses) and constrained to a 50 × 50 μm square. Some recordings were obtained with only IR-DIC. A loose patch seal onto the myelin at the selected axonal site was made with a patch pipette (5–7 MΩ) filled with 145 mm NaCl and 10 mm HEPES, buffered with NaOH to a pH of 7.4. Axonal signals were acquired with an Axopatch 200B amplifier in current-clamp mode, sampled at 50 kHz, and filtered at 5 kHz.
To generate input–output curves, a tonic hyperpolarizing current was injected to hold cells near −70 mV, and a series of 400 ms current steps was injected into the cell, starting at −0.3 nA and incrementing by 0.1 nA. For suprathreshold current injections, Purkinje cells nearly always responded by firing a regular train of action potentials that lasted throughout the step, from which the firing rate could be calculated as spikes per second. Exceptions included irregular trains at low current injections, occasional bursts, and depolarization block at the highest current injections. Current amplitudes were increased until the cell entered depolarization block and ceased to fire throughout the step. The maximal firing rate was taken as the spike rate evoked by the previous step.
For local drug application, patch pipettes (3–5 MΩ) were filled with tetrodotoxin (TTX) (Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel) or β-pompilidotoxin (β-PMTX) (5–10 μm; Tocris Cookson) dissolved in HEPES-buffered ACSF (“puffer ACSF”) containing the following (in mm): 150 NaCl, 3.5 KCl, 10 HEPES, 1 MgCl2, and 2 CaCl2, buffered to pH 7.35 with NaOH. Except as noted, TTX was used at 100 nm, a concentration that is ∼30 times the Kd under conditions of ideal access of the drug to channels (Raman and Bean, 1997; Swensen and Bean, 2005). This concentration was chosen to be high enough to provide a substantial block in slices but low enough to keep the effects localized to the desired region of the neuron. For nodal application, the puffer pipette tip was positioned over the first branch point (within 5 μm) and visualized under fluorescence, and the solution was delivered by applying continuous pressure to the pipette through a syringe. During application, a small radius (5–10 μm) of tissue displacement was detectable. Positive controls in which TTX successfully blocked a substantial fraction of Na channels at the node include detection of propagation failures and effects of nodal TTX with perisomatic subsaturating TTX (sub-TTX) (see Results).
For local perfusion of the initial segment, choline-Cl was substituted for NaCl, and 0.5% fast green was included in the puffer ACSF. After the proximal axon was visualized under fluorescence, the puffer pipette tip was positioned ∼10 μm from the soma, at the midpoint of the initial segment (Gianola and Rossi, 2004). Light microscopy with contrast enhancement was used to visualize the application area as solution was applied. To ensure that choline was restricted to the initial segment, normal puffer ACSF was simultaneously applied to the soma with a second puffer pipette. Images were captured during current-clamp recordings with a Videum video card (Winnov, Santa Clara, CA).
Data and statistical analysis.
Analysis was done in Igor Pro (Wave-Metrics, Lake Oswego, OR). Axonal traces were analyzed to identify propagation successes and failures (Khaliq and Raman, 2005). Axonal signals were considered successes if the largest peak-to-peak voltage deflection (maximal peak-to-peak separation, 0.8 ms) within a 1.2 ms window about the peak of a somatic action potential exceeded 3 SDs above the noise. The mean noise amplitude was estimated by averaging 300 axonal peak-to-peak measurements taken in the absence of somatic spikes (>1.3 ms from a somatic spike). Latencies were measured as the time of the maximal dV/dt of the somatic spike subtracted from the time of the peak of the corresponding axonal spike (Meeks et al., 2005). Threshold was estimated as 2% of the maximal dV/dt (Jackson et al., 2004). The presence of the first depolarizing phase in the somatic spike dV/dt was confirmed by a corresponding region of negative slope in the second derivative.
Data are reported as mean ± SE. Maximal slopes in input–output curves were measured by linear regression over more than three points in the steepest portion of the curve. Statistical significance was assessed with Student’s paired two-tailed t tests, unless noted in the text as unpaired. Single asterisks in figures indicate p < 0.05; double asterisks indicate p < 0.001.
Histology.
Slices with biocytin-filled cells were transferred to 4% paraformaldehyde and stored at 4°C for >24 h. Slices were rinsed in PBS, and endogenous peroxidases were quenched by rinsing in 3% H2O2 and 10% methanol in PBS for 30 min. Slices were permeabilized with 2% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in PBS for 1 h and treated with ABC Vectastain Kit (Elite PK-6100; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 2 h. After rinsing in PBS, slices were DAB stained (Sigma Fast kit), rinsed again, and mounted for viewing. Images were recorded with a CCD camera (Optronics, Chelmsford, MA), and axon lengths were measured with Neurolucida software.
Results
With a goal of identifying regions on the Purkinje cell in which modulation of Na channels would have measurable, significant effects on firing rate, we applied blockers or modulators of Na channels to the soma and initial segment (the perisomatic region) and/or the first node of Ranvier and monitored the effects on spontaneous and evoked action potentials. First, to test the contribution of Na channels in the first node to Purkinje cell firing, somatic action potentials were recorded under current clamp while TTX was applied locally (∼30 μm diameter region) to the first branch point of the axon, which corresponds to the first node (Gianola and Rossi, 2004; Clark et al., 2005). To facilitate visualization of the axon, Alexa Fluor 594 (66 μm) was included in the somatic whole-cell recording pipette, and a puffer pipette was positioned at the first branch point (Fig. 1A), which was 138 ± 6 μm from the base of the soma (n = 44). As a first step in validating this approach, we first confirmed that the puffer pipette solution could reach axonal channels by applying 140 mm K+ to the first node and measuring responses in somata held at −70 or −60 mV. Consistent with successful perfusion of the node, 140 K+ elicited a depolarization from −70 mV and evoked trains of action potentials from −60 mV (n = 6) (Fig. 1B). Lateral movement of the pipette along the myelin, either ∼20 μm toward or away from the soma, eliminated the somatic depolarization, supporting the idea that the effect of perfusion was localized to the node.
Next, in physiological Na+ and K+, 100 nm TTX was applied to the first node. Nodal TTX did not change the action potential waveforms (Fig. 1C). The rate of firing, measured either with no injected current or on release of negative holding current, also remained unchanged (n = 15; p = 0.52) (Fig. 1D). To test the effect of blocking nodal Na channels on evoked action potentials, cells were silenced by hyperpolarization to −70 mV, and input–output curves were generated with somatic current steps. On average, neither input–output curves nor thresholds were changed by nodal TTX. The maximal firing rate of 290 ± 9 spikes/s in control remained at 284 ± 11 spikes/s with nodal TTX (n = 16; p = 0.34) (Fig. 1E), and threshold was −51 ± 1 mV in both conditions (n = 16; p = 0.99) (Fig. 1F). Similar results were obtained in Purkinje cells in slices from rat cerebellum (n = 3) (supplemental Fig. 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). After each experiment, the TTX pipette was moved near the soma to test whether TTX was flowing from the pipette. With application of perisomatic TTX, repetitive firing was abolished (n = 18) (Fig. 1E). These results suggest that Na channels in the first node of Purkinje axons are not necessary for maintaining the normal rate or threshold of somatic spikes.
It is possible, however, that distal regions of the axon assume the role of the first node during nodal TTX application or that TTX failed to reach nodal channels at a sufficiently high concentration to block them. Therefore, as an alternative method to estimate the relative contribution of the whole axon to firing, we compared action potentials in cells that lacked axons with those of cells that retained them (Colbert and Pan, 2002). Cells were considered to have “no axon” only if their axon had been cut (during normal preparation of slices) within 30 μm from the soma, as detected with fluorescence. To minimize the variance of population responses, comparisons were made between axon-retaining and axon-free cells in the same sets of slices. Spontaneous and maximal firing rates did not differ in cells with axons (90 ± 6 and 305 ± 12 spikes/s) and without axons (99 ± 11 and 288 ± 18 spikes/s; n = 9 per group; p = 0.49, p = 0.44, unpaired), nor was threshold significantly different (−47.3 ± 1 vs −45.5 ± 1 mV; p = 0.22, unpaired) (Fig. 1G,H). These results provide additional support to the idea that, in normal physiological saline, the perisomatic region alone is sufficient to initiate action potentials, whereas the first node makes little contribution to the generation of normal firing patterns.
It seems likely, however, that Na channels at the first node influence the propagation of action potentials to more distal points on the axon. To measure the effect of nodal TTX on action potential propagation, we made simultaneous somatic and axonal recordings (Khaliq and Raman, 2005). During somatic whole-cell current-clamp recordings, loose-patch recordings were made from axons 25–422 μm distal to the first node.
Under control conditions, propagation was >90% reliable up to ∼230 spikes/s (n = 6) (Fig. 2A,C) (Khaliq and Raman, 2005). Application of nodal TTX reduced the efficiency of propagation, so that the percentage of successes fell below 90% at a lower firing rate (∼150 spikes/s) (Fig. 2B,C). Although not surprising, this result provides a useful positive control indicating that the puffed TTX was successful in reducing nodal Na channel availability. Higher concentrations of nodal TTX (1 μm) further reduced the percentage of propagation; nevertheless, the somatic input–output relationship remained unchanged in high TTX, consistent with the results from 100 nm nodal TTX and cells with no axons. Additionally, the number of failures did not decrease with recording distance even >400 μm beyond the first node, suggesting that the absence of axonal signals corresponded to true propagation failures rather than action potentials with reduced amplitudes in the vicinity of the first node.
Because inferences about initiation site have been made on the basis of latency measurements (Clark et al., 2005), we tested whether nodal TTX changed spike latency. Nodal TTX increased the latency between somatic and distal axonal action potentials (n = 6; p < 0.001) (Fig. 2D). This increased latency can be interpreted in at least two ways. Either the initiation site was indeed at the first node in control solutions, and TTX shifted initiation toward the soma, or the initiation site was originally perisomatic and remained so in nodal TTX, but blockade of nodal Na channels slowed conduction along the axon. As a first effort to distinguish between these possibilities, we compared the derivatives of somatic spikes corresponding to successful propagation in control solutions with those corresponding to failed propagation in nodal TTX (Fig. 2E). In control solution, the derivative of the waveform has two phases, which correspond in other preparations to the early depolarization in the axon followed by the later depolarization of the soma (Coombs et al., 1957a; Colbert and Johnston, 1996). In Purkinje cells, two phases are also detectable, although they blend, such that no region of negative slope exists between them. We reasoned that blockade of Na channels at the initiation site would necessarily change the early depolarization. As shown in Figure 2F (top, middle), however, the somatic spikes as well as their derivatives with and without nodal TTX retained the first depolarizing phase, although the blockade of nodal Na channels was confirmed by the absence of a propagating spike (n = 7) (Fig. 2F, bottom). Together, these data are consistent with the idea that the first node primarily acts to increase the fidelity of propagation of high-frequency action potentials, which are initiated perisomatically.
Because Na channel density can be a major determinant of firing properties, it seemed possible that the perisomatic region might dominate Purkinje firing patterns because of its high-amplitude Na currents. If so, firing may be more sensitive to nodal Na channel activity if the number of functional perisomatic Na channels is reduced. To test this possibility, we first recorded the change in input–output curves induced by perisomatic sub-TTX (3–10 nm) (Fig. 3A). As shown in Figure 3B, perisomatic sub-TTX decreased the amplitude and reduced the rate of rise of spontaneous action potentials. Additionally, sub-TTX raised rheobase for evoking spikes by 150 ± 27 pA (n = 9; p < 0.001), decreased the maximal slope of the input–output curve from 305 ± 20 to 258 ± 16 Hz/nA (p = 0.05) (Fig. 3C), and raised threshold by 1.7 ± 1.1 mV (p = 0.04) (Fig. 3B,D), consistent with an effective reduction in somatic Na channel availability by sub-TTX.
Next, during continued perfusion of the perisomatic region with sub-TTX, 100 nm TTX (referred to simply as “TTX”) was applied to the first node (n = 9). Unlike nodal TTX alone, nodal TTX in the presence of perisomatic sub-TTX changed both the action potential waveform and firing rate (Fig. 3B). Moreover, rheobase increased by another 175 ± 36 pA (p < 0.001 vs sub-TTX and vs control), the maximal slope of the input–output relationship dropped to 221 ± 28 Hz/nA (p = 0.07 vs sub-TTX; p = 0.007 vs control) (Fig. 3C), and threshold further increased (p = 0.04 vs sub-TTX; p < 0.001 vs control) (Fig. 3B,D). The cumulative effect of sub-TTX at the soma and TTX at the node was indistinguishable whether TTX application at the node preceded sub-TTX at the soma (n = 5) or followed it (n = 9). These data support the idea that it is the large number of perisomatic Na channels that normally make reductions in Na channel activity in the first node inconsequential. They also suggest that, under conditions of relatively low perisomatic Na channel availability, either experimentally induced or naturally occurring, nodal channels can facilitate action potential initiation. Additionally, as Na channel availability changes at either site, as it may with rapid firing or channel modulation, the axon and soma may change their relative contributions to action potential generation.
We therefore tested the effect of increasing perisomatic or axonal Na channel availability with β-PMTX, which destabilizes fast inactivated states of Na channels (Kinoshita et al., 2001). In classical Na channels, the reduction of fast inactivation increases persistent current, whereas in Na channels with resurgent kinetics, it enlarges resurgent current (Grieco and Raman, 2004). In both cases, the increased depolarizing drive is likely to promote action potential generation. Consistent with this prediction, perisomatic application of β-PMTX increased the firing rate evoked by any given current injection (Fig. 4A) and decreased threshold (n = 10; p < 0.002) (Fig. 4C,G). Most importantly, the maximal slope of the input–output curve increased (from 252 ± 23 to 376 ± 47 Hz/nA; n = 16; p = 0.005), while leaving the maximal firing rate unchanged (290 ± 10 vs. 293 ± 15 spikes/s; n = 16; p = 0.76) (Fig. 4E). These results indicate that the additional β-PMTX-induced Na current did more than contribute subthreshold depolarization, which would be expected simply to left-shift the input–output curve. Instead, it increased the gain of the curve, suggesting that, for any given stimulus, the availability of perisomatic Na channels sets the rate at which spike initiation can occur.
In contrast, when β-PMTX was applied to the first node, the action potential waveforms, input–output curves, and threshold remained unchanged (n = 7) (Fig. 4B,D,F,G). Because all of the Na channel α subunits that are expressed by Purkinje neurons are sensitive to β-PMTX (Kinoshita et al., 2001; Grieco and Raman, 2004), it is unlikely that axonal Na channels were not modulated by the toxin. Instead, these results suggest that even increasing nodal Na channel availability and/or opening cannot override the firing rate set by perisomatic channels.
The observation that high-frequency action potentials fail to propagate if the excitability of first node is reduced by TTX raises the question of whether propagation will also fail when the excitability of the perisomatic region is elevated by β-PMTX. Specifically, if the nodal channels, untreated by β-PMTX, can set an upper limit on firing rate evoked by a given stimulus, then propagation reliability should decrease. Therefore, to test the reliability of propagation during somatic β-PMTX, we made simultaneous somatic and axonal recordings. As illustrated in Figure 5, A and B, and summarized in Figure 5C, although fixed current injections evoked higher spike rates in perisomatic β-PMTX than in control solutions, propagation was equally successful with and without the toxin (n = 6). These results indicate that any transmitter or drug-induced modulation that increases the availability of perisomatic Na channels alone is sufficient to increase the firing rate in Purkinje axons.
These data are consistent with the classical notion of the first node and distal axon as followers of perisomatic activity. They do not, however, rule out the possibility that either spontaneous or evoked action potentials might occur without excitation from the perisomatic region, i.e., that conditions may exist in which the axon can act as the driver rather than the follower. To test the ability of the first node and distal axon to initiate spikes in the absence of input from the soma and/or initial segment, simultaneous recordings of somatic and distal axonal activity were made while 100 nm TTX was applied perisomatically. Perisomatic TTX silenced spontaneous firing in both the somatic and axonal traces (n = 8) (Fig. 6A). Next, we tried to generate action potentials by depolarizing the axon via somatic current injections. The largest currents (1.5–4.5 nA) elicited only one to three spikes at the beginning of the 400 ms step (n = 8) (Fig. 6B,C), after which spiking ceased, indicating that the first node and distal axon were unable to sustain trains of action potentials with perisomatic Na channels blocked. Interestingly, however, the low-amplitude somatic spike in TTX could not have arisen from the soma or initial segment and may instead have originated in either the most distal initial segment or the first node, because Purkinje dendrites do not tend to produce fast Na-dependent spikes (Llinás and Sugimori, 1980). Consistent with the idea that perisomatic TTX forced the initiation site to move to a more distal site in the axon, the latency between the action potential in the soma and in the distal axon decreased in perisomatic TTX (n = 8; p = 0.025) (Fig. 6D).
Given the accumulation of evidence for a perisomatic initiation site, we next tested whether a role for the initial segment could be distinguished from that of the soma by blocking Na channels in the initial segment with a choline-substituted ACSF while puffing normal ACSF over the cell body. The location of the Na channel block was monitored with fast green included in the choline solution and was restricted to the first 20–40 μm of the axon (Fig. 7A). Two cells are included to illustrate the extent of choline perfusion and the reliability of the effect. As shown in Figure 7, B and C, choline slowed firing rates without affecting responses to subthreshold current steps. Similar results were obtained in two more cells with axons that were intact beyond the first node, as well as two cells with axons cut at ∼10 μm. When choline application extended over more than half the soma, cells stopped firing trains of fast action potentials in response to current steps, and the largest injections produced broad, low-amplitude action potentials that resembled calcium spikes (n = 4; data not shown). Differentiating the action potential waveforms revealed that choline perfusion over the initial segment reduced the initial inflection in the derivative (Fig. 7D), also evident as a reduction in the first peak of the second derivative (p < 0.001) (Fig. 7E). These results are consistent with the idea that the earliest depolarization, i.e., action potential initiation, normally occurs in the initial segment.
Choline block of the initial segment also slightly decreased the gain of input–output curves, reducing the maximal slope from 220 ± 11 to 178 ± 22 Hz/nA (p = 0.09) (Fig. 7F), and threshold increased from −44.7 ± 1.7 to −39.6 ± 1.1 mV (n = 4; p = 0.014). Rheobase was unchanged (p = 0.2), however, and maximal firing rates still exceeded 100 spikes/s. These data provide evidence that, although the initial segment is required for normal input–output curves, it is not necessary in an absolute sense for the production of action potentials. Instead, channels in the soma, unlike channels in the distal axon, can assume the role of action potential initiation when the initial segment is compromised.
Discussion
These results indicate that modulation of Na channels on the soma and initial segment can produce large changes in firing rates and thresholds of action potentials in Purkinje neurons. Additionally, because the initiation site, by reaching threshold, is likely to influence the rate and waveforms of action potentials measured elsewhere in the cell, these data provide direct evidence about the location of action potential initiation. Comparison of Na channel blockade at the first node and in the perisomatic region suggests that, although Na channels in the first node facilitate action potential propagation, they do not measurably affect firing rates. In contrast, both upmodulation and downmodulation of perisomatic Na channels strongly influences the gain of input–output curves. Moreover, the results of choline perfusion indicate that action potential initiation normally occurs within the first ∼30 μm of the Purkinje cell initial segment.
This conclusion differs from that of Clark et al. (2005). In that study, the latency between somatic and axonal extracellularly recorded membrane currents led to the suggestion that spike initiation occurred in the first node. The interpretation of these data, however, is complicated by at least two factors. First, membrane current is proportional to the first derivative of the membrane voltage, dV/dt, for a stationary action potential, but to the second derivative, d2V/dt2, for a propagating action potential (Hodgkin and Huxley, 1952). Therefore, when the action potential is stationary, the maximal inward current corresponds to the steepest part of the upstroke of the spike; however, when the action potential is propagating, the maximal inward current corresponds to the inflection preceding the upstroke, underestimating spike latency. In other words, in most regions of the axon, somatic and axonal current signals are not likely to be equivalent measures and cannot be compared directly.
Second, for myelinated axons, the action potential latency is not expected to vary continuously with distance along the axon. Instead, latency versus distance plots follow a step-like function, with latency increases occurring at nodes (Huxley and Stämpfli, 1949; Palmer and Stuart, 2005). As a result, latencies measured anywhere along the myelin between the initial segment and the first node of Ranvier are likely to be constant. Therefore, even if negative latencies were measured just proximal to the node of Ranvier, it would not follow that the spike was initiated at the node rather than at the initial segment.
In fact, the idea of an initiation site close to Purkinje somata is consistent with previous studies of propagation failures, evident as somatic action potentials without axonal spikes, and which occur in Purkinje axons during high-frequency activity (Khaliq and Raman, 2005; Monsivais et al., 2005). Such propagation failures hint that the perisomatic region can be a relatively autonomous spike generator, at least during high-frequency firing, because it is unlikely that action potentials backpropagate to the soma without forward-propagating at least some distance along the axon. In fact, failures can be recorded even proximal to the first node (Khaliq and Raman, 2005). Even if initiation were to occur at the first node at low firing rates, receding toward the soma only at high firing rates, this scenario still leads to the conclusion that the most reliable site of initiation in Purkinje cells is perisomatic.
Classical work on motoneurons demonstrated that action potentials are initiated in the initial segment (Coombs et al., 1957a,b), and subsequent studies in both myelinated and unmyelinated central neurons indicate that initiation occurs at or just beyond the initial segment, between 30 and 70 μm from the soma (Häusser et al., 1995; Colbert and Johnston, 1996; Williams and Stuart, 1999; Colbert and Pan, 2002; Meeks et al., 2005). These conclusions have been based on either locating the site at which TTX elicits the largest increase in spike threshold (Colbert and Johnston, 1996) or finding the site of negative-latency action potentials in unmyelinated axons (Meeks et al., 2005). Our data identify the relevant part of the axon as slightly more proximal; in Purkinje cells, restricting Na channel block to the first ∼30 μm of the initial segment with choline reduced or abolished the first phase of the spike waveform derivative while significantly raising threshold and flattening input–output curves.
The total effect of choline on the initial segment was relatively mild, however, resembling that of sub-TTX application to the entire perisomatic region. The present experiments therefore cannot resolve whether Na channels in the initial segment of Purkinje cells have a unique role beyond contribution of depolarizing drive against a low capacitance. Support for this idea, however, comes from studies of mutant mice lacking ankyrin-G, which usually targets Na channels to the initial segment and to nodes of Ranvier (Kordeli et al., 1995); Purkinje cells from these mice fire at reduced rates during current injections (Zhou et al., 1998). Moreover, NaV1.6 channels, which appear necessary for normal Purkinje cell firing (Raman et al., 1997), are targeted to the initial segment in Purkinje and other neurons (Jenkins and Bennett, 2001; Boiko et al., 2003).
Nevertheless, manipulations that made the initial segment less excitable by Na channel blockade indicated that the soma, unlike the distal axon, retained the capacity to initiate trains of action potentials. In general, this ease of somatic spiking may reflect a fundamental difference in spike generation in spontaneously firing cells. Specifically, in nonspontaneously active neurons, action potentials are usually initiated by EPSPs, which originate in the dendrite, spread to the soma, and arrive at the axon in which a spike is initiated and backpropagates to the soma and dendrites (Spruston et al., 1995; Colbert and Johnston, 1996). In contrast, the somata of spontaneously firing cells appear to participate more actively in spike initiation. As mentioned, many classes of spontaneously active neurons maintain their characteristic firing patterns in isolated cell body preparations, although they generally retain little if any axon (Raman and Bean, 1997; Raman et al., 2000; Taddese and Bean, 2002; Do and Bean, 2004; Jackson et al., 2004; Puopolo et al., 2005). This persistence of activity despite axonal cleavage must result from factors such as the density and gating properties of somatic channels in spontaneously active cells. For instance, whereas subicular pyramidal cells express three to four Na channels/μm2 (Colbert and Johnston, 1996), Purkinje somata have more than twice the Na channel density, with estimates of 7–10 channels/μm2 (Stuart and Häusser, 1994; Raman and Bean, 1999). In addition, specialized Na channels in Purkinje somata keep channel availability high and depolarize the membrane at interspike potentials, promoting action potential generation (Raman and Bean, 1999; Khaliq et al., 2003). Somatic K channels also facilitate spiking, because they deactivate rapidly during repolarization, permitting renewed depolarization soon after each action potential (Raman and Bean, 1999; Southan and Robertson, 2000; Rudy and McBain, 2001).
Whether axonal channels have the same attributes is unknown. Nevertheless, our data suggest that neither the first node nor any part of the axon beyond ∼30 μm of the initial segment is sufficient to initiate spikes resembling the normal firing patterns of Purkinje cells. This argument is based primarily on the observation that, in the presence of perisomatic TTX, the node and distal axon could not sustain trains of action potentials during steady depolarizations. This result is consistent with work in other preparations showing strong spike frequency adaptation in axons (Bostock, 1995). In motoneurons, this adaptation results from axonal expression of slow outward-rectifier K channels (Baker et al., 1987); our data suggest that Purkinje axons may share this trait. The failure of Purkinje axons to fire repetitively during steady current injections, despite their ability to produce >200 spikes/s when the soma does likewise, supports the classical idea that the first node and distal axon are excellent followers of perisomatic activity. Perhaps not surprisingly, the most overt role of the first node that we could resolve was to improve the fidelity of high-frequency transmission.
Defining how changes in somatic and axonal excitability contribute to setting firing rates allows predictions about which regions on the cell may be good targets for modulating Purkinje cell output. Our data indicate that, excepting a blockade of nodal excitability, which impedes propagation of high-frequency spikes, Purkinje cell firing is relatively resistant to modulation of Na channels beyond the initial segment. In contrast, perisomatic synaptic inhibition appears well situated to limit firing effectively (Palay and Chan-Palay, 1974; Bobik et al., 2004). Firing is also likely to be sensitive to modulation of perisomatic Na channels, e.g., by kinases and/or phosphatases (Cantrell and Catterall, 2001). Finally, the large effect of perisomatic β-PMTX on propagating action potentials predicts that changing the amplitude of resurgent Na current will translate directly into changes in spike output.
Footnotes
-
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS047991 (Z.M.K.) and NS39395 (I.M.R.) and the Klingenstein Foundation (I.M.R.). We thank Sascha du Lac for the L7-GFP mice and Jason Pugh, Teresa Aman, Catherine Woolley, and Nelson Spruston for comments on a previous version of this manuscript. We are also grateful to Bernardo Sabatini for helpful discussion.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Indira M. Raman, Department of Neurobiology and Physiology, 2205 Tech Drive, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208. Email: i-raman{at}northwestern.edu