Stress modulates the use of spatial versus stimulus-response learning strategies in humans

  1. Lars Schwabe1,4,
  2. Melly S. Oitzl3,
  3. Christine Philippsen1,
  4. Steffen Richter1,
  5. Andreas Bohringer1,
  6. Werner Wippich2, and
  7. Hartmut Schachinger1
  1. 1 Division of Clinical Physiology, Institute of Psychobiology, University of Trier, 54290-Trier, Germany;
  2. 2 Division of Cognitive Psychology, University of Trier, 54296-Trier, Germany;
  3. 3 Division of Medical Pharmacology, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, University of Leiden, 2300 RA-Leiden, The Netherlands

Abstract

Animal studies provided evidence that stress modulates multiple memory systems, favoring caudate nucleus-based “habit” memory over hippocampus-based “cognitive” memory. However, effects of stress on learning strategy and memory consolidation were not differentiated. We specifically address the effects of psychosocial stress on the applied learning strategy in humans. We designed a spatial learning task that allowed differentiating spatial from stimulus-response learning strategies during acquisition. In 13 subsequent trials, participants (88 male and female students) had to locate a “win” card out of four placed at a fixed location in a 3D model of a room. Relocating one cue in the last trial allowed inferring the applied learning strategy. Half of them participated first in the “Trier Social Stress Test.” Salivary cortisol and heart rate measurements were taken. Stressed participants used a stimulus-response strategy significantly more often than controls. Subsequent verbal report revealed that spatial learners had a more complete awareness of response options than stimulus-response learners. Importantly, learning performance was not affected by stress. Taken together, stress prior to learning facilitated simple stimulus-response learning strategies in humans—at the expense of a more cognitive learning strategy. Depending on the context, we consider this as an adaptive response.

Footnotes

| Table of Contents