Abstract
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway plays a pivotal role in intracellular signaling, and this cascade may impinge on cAMP response elements (CREs) of target genes. Both the MAPK pathway and chromogranin A expression may be activated by cytosolic calcium influx, and calcium-dependent signals map onto the chromogranin A promoter proximal CRE. We therefore probed the role of the MAPK pathway in chromogranin A biosynthesis after secretory stimulation of PC12 pheochromocytoma cells by the nicotinic cholinergic pathway, the physiological secretory trigger. Chemical inhibition of either MAPK or MAPK kinase blocked the response of a transfected chromogranin A promoter to nicotine or protein kinase C activation [by phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA)], although nicotine-evoked catecholamine secretion was unaffected. Activation of the MAP kinase cascade (Ras, Raf, MAPK, or CREB kinase) by cotransfection of pathway components stimulated the chromogranin A promoter. Cotransfection of MAPK pathway dominant negative mutants (for Raf, MAPK, or CREB kinase) blocked nicotinic or PMA activation of chromogranin A, although a dominant negative Ras mutant was without effect. MAPK pathway enzymatic activity was stimulated by both nicotine and PMA. Point mutations of the chromogranin A CRE suggested that this element was necessary incis for stimulation by nicotine, PMA, or chemical activation of the MAPK pathway. Transfer of the CRE to a heterologous promoter conferred inducibility by not only nicotine or cAMP but also MAPK activation. Expression of the CREB antagonist KCREB blocked the response of the chromogranin A promoter to nicotine, cAMP, or MAPK pathway activation by either chemical stimulation or cotransfection of active cascade components. Chromogranin A mRNA responded to MAPK pathway manipulation in a fashion similar to the transfected chromogranin A promoter, in both direction and magnitude. We conclude that the MAPK pathway is a necessary intermediate in signaling from the nicotinic receptor to secretory protein transcription, although not to catecholamine secretion. In trans, this response seems to involve the following signal cascade: protein kinase C → Raf → MAPK kinase → MAPK → CREB kinase → CREB. In cis, activation by the cascade maps onto the chromogranin A promoter proximal CRE, which is both necessary and sufficient to confer the response.
The MAPK pathway plays an increasingly appreciated role in diverse cellular signaling processes, including signaling of several growth factors and hormones toward gene expression (Kyriakis and Avruch, 1996; Treismanet al., 1996; Robinson et al., 1997). Growth factor activation of the MAPK pathway may impinge onto the CREs of target genes, with activation of CREB through phosphorylation by CREB kinase, otherwise known as ribosomal protein S6 serine kinase 2 (Rsk2;Xing et al., 1996), which is in turn activated through phosphorylation by MAPK (Xing et al., 1996).
In previous studies, we probed the mechanism of transcriptional activation of the secretory granule protein chromogranin A by stimulation of chromaffin cells through the physiological nicotinic cholinergic pathway (Tang et al., 1996, 1997). The biosynthesis of chromogranin A, the major protein stored and released by exocytosis with catecholamines (Takiyyuddin et al., 1990), is activated by nicotinic stimulation (Tang et al., 1996), and the response requires the participation of the chromogranin A promoter CRE in cis (Tang et al., 1996, 1997) and the transcription factor CREB in trans (Tang et al., 1996, 1997). This response is also absolutely dependent on cytosolic calcium influx and consequent activation of protein kinase C (Tang et al., 1997).
Because the MAPK cascade also can be triggered by protein kinase C activation (Marquardt et al., 1994), we wondered whether the protein kinase C-dependent actions of nicotine might trigger the MAPK pathway in chromaffin cells and whether this sequence of events might be involved in chromaffin cell transcriptional responses to nicotinic stimulation. Our interest was heightened not only because protein kinase C is involved in nicotinic (Tang et al., 1997) and MAPK (Marquardt et al., 1994) signaling but also because both nicotinic (Tang et al., 1997) and MAPK (Xing et al., 1996) transcriptional signals may converge on the protein CREB in trans and CREs in cis.
We therefore explored the role of the MAPK pathway in the actions of nicotinic cholinergic stimulation to trigger secretory protein transcription in chromaffin cells. Our results suggest that this pathway plays a crucial (indeed indispensable) role in nicotinic signaling to chromogranin A transcription, although not to catecholamine secretion. Furthermore, MAPK responses use the transcription factor CREB in trans and the chromogranin A promoter proximal CRE in cis.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture and transfections.
PC12 (Greene and Tischler, 1976) cells (passages 10–25) were cultured and transfected by lipofection, as described previously (Tang et al., 1996).
Plasmids.
In plasmid pXP-1133, a functional mouse chromogranin A promoter drives expression of a luciferase reporter (Wuet al., 1994); the promoter region in this plasmid extends from −1133 bp upstream of the transcription initiation (cap) site to +42 bp downstream of the cap site.
The mouse chromogranin A promoter CRE (CRE box; [−71 bp]5′-TGACGTAA-3′[−64 bp]) occurs at position −71 to −64 bp upstream of the cap site. CRE box mutants M13 and M41 have been described previously (Wu et al., 1995). Mutant M13, in which 6 of 8 CRE bases are changed (to CATCACCA; changes underlined), occurs in a 100-bp promoter/reporter construct (control promoter/reporter plasmid: pXP-100). Mutant M41, a CRE point-gap mutant (to TGA-GTAA) occurs in a 77-bp promoter/reporter (control promoter/reporter plasmid: pXP-77).
The mouse chromogranin A promoter CRE domain (TGACGTAA), a CRE box point mutant (TGA-GTAA), and a consensus CRE (TGACGTCA;Roesler et al., 1988) were positioned just upstream of the heterologous herpes simplex virus TK promoter, in a TK/luciferase promoter/reporter (Wu et al., 1995).
Other eukaryotic expression plasmids used in this research include (1) wild-type human Erk1 (pCMV5Erk1), or its dominant negative mutant K71R (pCMV5 Erk1 K71R), as well as wild-type rat Erk2 (pCMV5Erk2), or its dominant negative mutant K52R (pCMV5 Erk2 K52R), each driven by the CMV promoter (from John K. Westwick, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Westwick et al., 1994; Robbins et al., 1993). (2) Wild-type rat Raf-1 (KSRSPA cRAF), or its dominant negative mutant K375R (KS RSPA cRAF DN), each driven by the RSV-LTR promoter, were from Michael Karin (University of California, San Diego, CA) (Thorburn et al., 1994). (3) Wild-type c-Ha-Ras (pCD-WTras), or its dominant negative mutant pCD-DNras (S17N), each driven by the SV40 early promoter, were from Neil M. Nathanson (University of Washington, Seattle, WA) (Feig and Cooper, 1988; Feig et al., 1986). (4) Wild-type human CREB kinase (also called RSK2, HA-epitope-tagged in pMT2HARSK2), or its K100R dominant negative mutant (pMT2HARSK2KR100), each driven by the adenovirus major late promoter (AML), were from Michael E. Greenberg (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) (Xing et al., 1996). (5) The CREB dominant negative (inhibitory) DNA binding domain point mutant KCREB, driven by the RSV-LTR (in pRSV-KCREB), was from Richard H. Goodman (Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR) (Walton et al., 1992). (6) A 71-bp c-Fos promoter, which includes a “calcium response element” at 5′-TGACGTTT-3′ (−62 to −54 bp upstream of the c-fos cap site), linked to a CAT reporter (“−71 wt fos CAT”), was from Michael E. Greenberg (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) (Sheng et al., 1988).
Assays and catecholamine secretion.
Luciferase reporter activity was measured in cell extracts by luminometry (Dewet et al., 1986). In the c-fos promoter/CAT reporter study, CAT activity was measured by incorporation of [14C]acetyl groups into chloramphenicol (Gormanet al., 1982). Catecholamine secretion from PC12 cells preloaded with [3H]-l-norepinephrine was accomplished as described previously (Parmer et al., 1993). Protein was measured by the Coomassie blue dye binding assay (Bradford, 1976).
MAPK pathway activity was measured with an MAP Kinase Assay Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) (Boulton et al., 1991; Davis, 1993). PC12 cells (in 10-cm plates) under different experimental conditions were harvested with PBS and then lysed with 1 ml of lysis buffer (2.5 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100, 0.2 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mmdithiothreitol, and 2 mm Na vanadate). After pelleting cell lysates, supernate protein concentrations were measured, and an anti-MAPK antibody (Stratagene) was added to supernates at 1 μl/mg protein. After a 1-hr incubation at 4°, 20 μl of protein A beads (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) was added in lysis buffer, followed by continued incubation for 30 min. The beads were washed three times with lysis buffer and dissolved into a final volume of 24 μl of lysis buffer, subsequently used for MAPK assay. Samples from the above immunoprecipitation were mixed with [γ-32P]ATP in reaction buffer, with the MAPK substrate PHAS-I (phosphorylated heat- and acid-stable protein regulated by insulin). Mixtures were incubated at 30° for 20 min and then electrophoresed on Tris-glycine sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gradient gels (10–27%; NOVEX, La Jolla, CA), followed by exposure to Kodak X-ray film at −70°. After fluorographic exposure,32P-labeled protein bands were excised from gels based on autoradiography, and the dpm of each band was obtained by liquid scintillation counting.
Pharmacology.
The effect of the following agents on transcription or secretion was tested at concentrations and times indicated for a particular experiment. Nicotine was from Sigma Chemical. Doses of nicotine for activation of chromogranin A transcription (maximal at 1 mm nicotine) versus catecholamine secretion (maximal at 60–100 μm nicotine) were optimized by previous dose-response analyses (Tang et al., 1996). PMA, the MAPK inhibitor apigenin (Kuo and Yang, 1995;Sato et al., 1994), the MAPK kinase inhibitor PD-98059 (Alessi et al., 1995), and the MAPK pathway activators ATA (Okada and Koizumi, 1995), PAF (C16; Hondaet al., 1994), andN-hexanoyl-d-erythro-sphingosine (C6-ceramide; Jayadev et al., 1995) were obtained from Calbiochem/Novabiochem (La Jolla, CA).
Statistics.
Results are reported as the mean ± 1 standard error value. Data were analyzed by either t test (two groups) or analysis of variance (three or more groups) using the software packages Statworks or Cricketgraph (Cricket Software, Malvern, PA) or StatView (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA), each for the Macintosh microcomputer. Differences were considered significant atp < 0.05.
Results and Discussion
Involvement of the MAPK pathway in nicotinic cholinergic signaling to chromogranin A transcription, although not catecholamine secretion: Effects of MAPK pathway chemical inhibitors.
We used the MAPK pathway enzymatic activity inhibitors apigenin (MAPK inhibitor; Satoet al., 1994) or PD98059 (MAPK kinase inhibitor; Alessiet al., 1995) to probe that pathway’s potential involvement in nicotinic cholinergic signaling in PC12 cells. Both nicotine and the protein kinase C activator PMA stimulated the transfected chromogranin A promoter, and in each case the stimulation was substantially blunted by inhibition of either MAPK or MEK (Table1). The inhibitors alone (without the activators [nicotine or PMA]) had only a modest effect on basal expression of the transfected promoter.
Nicotine also activated catecholamine secretion, but neither basal nor nicotine-stimulated catecholamine release was affected by inhibition of either MAPK or MEK (Table 1), despite preincubation of PC12 cells with each inhibitor for 1 hr before nicotinic secretory stimulation. Thus, the MAPK pathway seems to be involved in the chromogranin A transcriptional (although not the catecholamine secretory) response to nicotine or PMA.
Activation of the MAPK pathway by cotransfection: Effect on chromogranin A transcription.
During growth factor stimulation (Ginty et al., 1994), the MAPK pathway may relay signals to the transcription factor CREB by the action of MAPK (Erk) on CREB kinase (Rsk2), which in turn activates CREB by phosphorylation on CREB Ser133 (Xing et al., 1996).
We overexpressed several components of the MAPK pathway (Ras, Raf, Erk, or RSK2; Okada and Koizumi, 1995; Pang et al., 1995; Johnson and Nathanson, 1994) in PC12 cells by cotransfection with an 1133-bp mouse chromogranin A promoter/luciferase reporter plasmid. Each of these components trans-activated the transfected chromogranin A promoter (by 1.7–5.7-fold; Fig.1) and in some cases (e.g., Raf-1 or Erk-1) substantially augmented the chromogranin A transcriptional response to nicotine. Thus, overexpression of MAPK pathway components also can activate the chromogranin A promoter.
Inhibition of the MAPK pathway by cotransfection: Effect on chromogranin A transcription.
ATP binding domain, dominant negative (inhibitory) point mutants have been developed for several components of the MAPK cascade: Ras (Feig et al., 1986; Feig and Cooper, 1988), Raf (Thorburn et al., 1994), Erk (Robbinset al., 1993; Westwick et al., 1994), and CREB kinase (Xing et al., 1996).
The chromogranin A transcriptional response to nicotine was almost completely inhibited by expression of dominant negative mutants (Fig.2) of three of these MAPK pathway components (Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase; Kyriakis and Avruch, 1996;Treisman et al. 1996; Robinson et al., 1997), although not by a dominant negative Ras mutant. Likewise, the chromogranin A transcriptional response to protein kinase C activation (by PMA) was at least partially blocked by dominant negative mutants of Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase, although not by the Ras mutant (Fig. 2).
As a positive control, the effects of NGF on chromogranin A transcription also were evaluated in the same experiment. NGF signaling to chromogranin A transcription was substantially blocked by each of the dominant negative mutants (for Ras, Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase). Thus, the Ras dominant negative mutant was functional, and its lack of inhibition of nicotine or PMA effects, suggests that Ras does not signal for nicotine or PMA. Thus, specific mutant disruption of the MAPK pathway inhibits the chromogranin A transcriptional response to nicotine or PMA but only at the Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase steps (although not at the level of Ras).
Nicotine or PMA effects on MAPK pathway enzymatic activity in PC12 cells.
In an MAPK activity assay (Fig.3), nicotine augmented phosphorylation of an MAPK substrate by 1.8-fold at 30 min, 4.6-fold at 1 hr, and 2.2-fold at 12 hr. PMA increased activity by 3.2-fold at 30 min. Thus, MAPK pathway enzymatic activity is triggered by nicotine or PMA in PC12 cells.
MAPK pathway signaling to the chromogranin A promoter: Localization of the activation to the CRE.
Because nicotinic cholinergic stimulation of chromogranin A transcription maps substantially onto the chromogranin A promoter proximal CRE, [−71 bp]5′-TGACGTAA-3′[−64 bp] (Tang et al., 1996), we tested the effects of not only nicotine but also several MAPK pathway activators on transfected proximal chromogranin A promoter/reporter constructs: the MAPK activator ATA (Okada et al., 1995), the MAPK and MEK activator PAF (C16) (Honda et al., 1994), or the MAPK activator N-hexanoyld-erythro-sphingosine (C6-ceramide) (Jayadev et al., 1995).
Not only nicotine and PMA but also each of the MAPK pathway activators (ATA, PAF, or C6-ceramide),trans-activated the transfected chromogranin A promoter in PC12 cells (Table 2). Both a 100-bp promoter (in plasmid pXP-100) and a 77-bp promoter (in plasmid pXP-77) were activated by each stimulus.
The degree of nicotinic activation of the 100-bp (2.28-fold; pXP-100; Table 2), 77-bp (1.91-fold; pXP-77; Table 2), or 1133-bp (2.66-fold; pXP-1133; Table 1) transfected chromogranin A promoters was similar. Likewise, the degree of PMA activation of the 100-bp (2.01-fold; pXP-100; Table 2), and 77-bp (1.84-fold; pXP-77; Table 2) transfected chromogranin A promoters was similar.
MAPK pathway activators stimulated the transfected 100-bp chromogranin A promoter (pXP-100) to an extent (2.32–2.65-fold) similar to nicotinic (2.28-fold) or PMA (2.01-fold) stimulation (Table 2). Likewise, MAPK pathway activators stimulated the transfected 77-bp chromogranin A promoter (pXP-77) to an extent (1.86–2.36-fold) similar to nicotinic (1.91-fold) or PMA (1.84-fold) induction (Table 2).
Site-directed mutation of the chromogranin A promoter CRE (TGACGTAA; Table 2), either a 6/8-bp change (to CATCACCA) in a 100-bp promoter (mutant M13) or a single base gap (to TGA-GTAA) in a 77-bp promoter (mutant M41), virtually abolished the chromogranin A promoter response to not only nicotine or PMA but also the three MAPK pathway activators: ATA, PAF, and C6-ceramide. Thus, the chromogranin A promoter proximal CRE, [−71 bp]5′-TGACGTAA-3′[−64 bp], seemed to be necessary (indeed, indispensable) in cis for activation of transcription in response to nicotinic stimulation, protein kinase C activation, or MAPK pathway activation.
Role of the chromogranin A CRE as a sufficient domain to transmit MAPK pathway activation signals.
To test whether the mouse chromogranin A promoter proximal CRE, [−71 bp]5′-TGACGTAA-3′[−64 bp], was sufficient to account for the response to MAPK pathway activation, we fused the chromogranin A CRE (TGACGTAA) to a previously unresponsive, heterologous (TK) promoter, which was in turn fused to a luciferase reporter (pTK-LUC; Wu et al., 1994, 1995), yielding the plasmid mCgA-CRE-TK. We also fused a mutant CRE (TGA-GTAA) to the TK promoter, yielding the plasmid Mutant-CRE-TK (Wu et al., 1995); and a consensus CRE (TGACGTCA) to the TK promoter, yielding the plasmid Perfect-CRE-TK (Roesler et al., 1988; Wu et al., 1995).
The MAPK pathway activators ATA, PAF, and C6-ceramide each stimulated the isolated CRE box (Table 3), and the degree of stimulation (2.27–3.16-fold) was similar to that seen for the intact 1133-bp chromogranin A promoter (pXP-1133; 2.94–4.31-fold). By contrast, the three MAPK pathway activators did not stimulate the control heterologous TK promoter without a CRE (in pTK-LUC), nor was this minimal promoter stimulated by nicotine or cAMP. The chromogranin A CRE (in mCgA-CRE-TK) was stimulated to a similar degree by direct MAPK activators (2.27–3.16-fold), nicotine (4.06-fold), or cAMP itself (3.92-fold). A similar plasmid with a consensus CRE (TGACGTCA; Perfect-CRE-TK) also was stimulated to similar extents by MAPK activators (3.87–4.16-fold), nicotine (5.03-fold), or cAMP (8.11-fold). Thus, the proximal CRE seems to be a sufficient element incis to account for activation of the chromogranin A promoter by MAPK pathway stimulation.
A “calcium response element,” similar in sequence (TGACGTTT) to a CRE (TGACGT[C/A]A), also can be activated by nicotinic cholinergic stimulation, through an MAPK-dependent pathway.
Greenberg et al. (Ginty et al., 1994) characterized a “calcium response element” in the c-Fos promoter that responds to cytosolic calcium-dependent signals. A c-Fos promoter/reporter plasmid (−71 wtfos CAT) containing the calcium response element also was activated (p < 0.05) by either nicotine (1.8-fold) or PMA (1.4-fold), and each of these activations was almost entirely blocked (p < 0.05) by inhibition of the MAPK pathway, either at MAPK (by apigenin, 12.5 μm) or at MEK (by PD98059, 40 μm). Thus, the calcium response element (TGACGTTT) responds to nicotine and PMA stimulation in much the same MAPK pathway-dependent fashion as the chromogranin A CRE (TGACGTAA).
Role of the transcription factor CREB in relaying signals from the MAPK pathway: studies with chemical activators of MAPK.
Goodmanet al. (Walton et al., 1992) developed a CREB point mutant in the CREB DNA-binding domain, the expression of which acts as in dominant negative (inhibitory) fashion, perhaps by heterodimerizing with and thereby inactivating wild-type CREB. When we coexpressed KCREB along with the 1133-bp mouse chromogranin A a promoter/reporter plasmid in PC12 cells (Fig.4), the chromogranin A promoter response to nicotine was diminished by 73% (p < 0.05), whereas the response to three MAPK pathway chemical activators (ATA, PAF, or C6-ceramide) was virtually abolished. As a positive control, the effects of cAMP on chromogranin A transcription also were blocked by KCREB expression (Fig. 4). Thus, CREB seemed to be a necessary downstream element in signaling by MAPK pathway chemical activation.
Role of the transcription factor CREB in relaying signals from the MAPK pathway: studies with transfected overexpression of MAPK pathway components.
Overexpression by cotransfection of Ras, Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase each activated the transfected chromogranin A promoter in PC12 cells, by 1.8- to 3.8-fold (Fig. 5). Coexpression of the CREB antagonist KCREB blunted the effects of not only nicotine (Fig. 4) but also Ras, Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase (Fig. 5); blockade of Raf, Erk, or CREB kinase effects was virtually complete. Thus, CREB seemed to be a necessary downstream element in signaling by each of these MAPK pathway components (Ras, Raf, Erk, and CREB kinase).
Response of the endogenous (chromosomal) chromogranin A gene in PC12 cells to the MAPK pathway.
The studies reported above relied on activation of a transfected chromogranin A promoter. Do the same observations apply to the chromogranin A gene as it exists in its usual chromosomal location? For this question, we turned to mRNA blots, evaluating the steady state levels of the chromogranin A message (Fig.6). The chromogranin A mRNA was augmented 2.78-fold by nicotine, and this induction was entirely blocked by either the MAPK inhibitor apigenin or the MEK inhibitor PD98059.
Two MAPK activators each increased the chromogranin A mRNA: 2.51-fold for ATA, and 3.02-fold for PAF. When coadministered, nicotine plus the MAPK activators had slightly less than additive effects: 4.64-fold for nicotine plus ATA and 3.88-fold for nicotine plus PAF. Thus, the endogenous chromogranin A gene responds to MAPK pathway activation in a manner similar in direction (Table 1) and magnitude (Tables 2 and 3; Fig. 4) to the responses of the transfected chromogranin A promoter.
Conclusions.
Our results can be summarized and interpreted most parsimoniously by the following model (see Fig.7). Nicotinic cholinergic stimulation triggers an initial cytosolic influx of sodium (Tang et al., 1997), creating membrane depolarization that then admits calcium to the cytosol through voltage-gated calcium channels (Tang et al., 1996, 1997). Calcium activates protein kinase C, thereby triggering the MAPK cascade, initially by Serine/Threonine phosphorylating and thereby activating Raf (Kyriakis and Avruch, 1996; Treisman et al., 1996; Robinson et al., 1997), which in turn causes the sequential phosphorylation and activation of MEK, MAPK, CREB kinase, and CREB. CREB, activated by phosphorylation on Ser133 (Tang et al., 1996), finally relays the transcriptional signal to the CRE ([−71 bp]5′-TGACGTAA-3′[−64 bp]) of the chromogranin A proximal promoter.
Although the protooncogene Ras activated chromogranin A transcription (Figs. 1 and 5) and a dominant negative Ras mutant (S17N) blocked chromogranin A promoter activation by NGF (Fig. 2), the dominant negative Ras mutant did not affect nicotinic signaling to chromogranin A (Fig. 2). Thus, although Ras is a potent early activator of the MAPK pathway (Figs. 1 and 5), nicotinic or protein kinase C signaling into the MAPK pathway seems to proceed through Raf-1 without involving Ras (Fig. 7).
Nicotinic cholinergic stimulation stimulates the enzymatic activity of the MAPK pathway (Fig. 3), and disruption of the MAPK pathway, by either chemical inhibition (Table 1) or dominant negative mutants of pathway components (Fig. 2), abolishes nicotinic signaling toward secretory protein transcription. Thus, the MAPK pathway is necessary intrans for nicotinic signaling to the chromogranin A promoter. The CRE (TGACGTAA) seems to be both necessary (Table 2) and sufficient (Table 3) in cis for transmission of signals initiated by either nicotine or the MAPK pathway.
MAPK pathway chemical activation triggered increases in chromogranin A promoter activity similar in direction and magnitude to that obtained after nicotine (Tables 2 and 3); similarly, MAPK pathway chemical inhibition diminished the chromogranin A promoter response to nicotine (Table 1). While we measured MAPK pathway enzymatic activity (phosphorylation of the MAPK substrate PHAS-I) under only a few circumstances (nicotine or phorbol ester; Fig. 3), inhibition of the nicotine response by both chemical (Table 1) and genetic (Fig. 2) blockade of the MAPK pathway argues for a crucial role of this pathway in mediating the nicotinic response of chromogranin A. Although MAPK pathway activation seems to be crucial for transcriptional responses to nicotinic cholinergic stimulation (Tables 1, Fig. 2), this pathway apparently does not impinge on catecholamine secretion (Table 1) triggered by the same nicotinic stimulus.
Xing et al. (1996) first identified Rsk2 as CREB kinase, and they pointed out its central role in MAPK cascade signaling to c-Fos gene expression at the CRE in cis. Our studies extend the spectrum of CREB/cAMP targets for the MAPK pathway to secretory proteins (such as chromogranin A) and extend the range of MAPK pathway activators to the nicotinic cholinergic system (Tang et al., 1996, 1997), the physiological mediator of neurotransmission in autonomic ganglia (both sympathetic and parasympathetic), chromaffin cells, and a diverse population of central neurons (Wonnacott, 1997).
The CREB antagonist KCREB virtually abolished the response of the chromogranin A promoter to chemical activation of the MAPK pathway or to cAMP (Fig. 4), but the response to nicotine was incompletely (only 73%) disrupted by KCREB. Because both nicotinic and MAPK pathway activation of chromogranin A map onto the promoter CRE (Tables 2 and3), perhaps a trans-activating factor other than CREB may signal in a quantitatively minor fashion to the promoter CRE, accounting for a portion of the nicotinic response. For example, other members of the CREB/activating transcription factor family may bind to CRE elements, as may members of the AP-1/Jun-Fos/Fra family (Habener, 1990).
Xia et al. (1996) described MAPK cascade activation by cytosolic calcium influx after glutamate/N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor activation in primary neurons. Because glutamate/N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors and nicotinic cholinergic receptors are both members of the same superfamily of extracellular ligand-gated heteropentameric cation channels, our results perhaps are analogous, although involving different receptor family members (Conley, 1996).
Rosen and Greenberg (1996) also found MAPK stimulation after voltage-sensitive calcium channel activation. Although our dominant negative mutant results seemed to exclude a role for Ras (Fig. 2), and our inhibitor results (Tang et al., 1997) instead suggest a necessary role for protein kinase C, Rosen and Greenberg (1996) andRosen et al. (1994) found that some calcium-influx signals to the MAPK cascade were quite Ras dependent. Different results in particular signaling pathways may reflect the very different targets we studied. For example, Rosen and Greenberg (1996) and Rosen et al. (1994) found that the Ras-dependent pathway also was activated by release of calcium from intracellular stores, while we found that only extracellular calcium influx could trigger transcription of chromogranin A (Tang et al., 1996, 1997).
In conclusion, our results suggest that the MAPK pathway plays a crucial role in nicotinic cholinergic signaling in chromaffin cells to secretory protein transcription, although not to catecholamine secretion. In trans, our results suggest this signal transduction cascade: protein kinase C → Raf → MEK → MAPK → CREB kinase → CREB. In cis, the chromogranin A promoter CRE is both necessary and sufficient to confer both nicotinic and MAPK responses.
Acknowledgments
Gifts of expression plasmids included activator/inhibitor Ras (N. M. Nathanson, University of Washington, Seattle, WA), activator/inhibitor Raf (M. Karin, University of California, San Diego, CA), activator/inhibitor Erk1 and Erk2 (J. K. Westwick, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC), activator/inhibitor CREB kinase and 71-bp c-fos/CAT promoter/reporter (M. E. Greenberg, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA), and KCREB (R. H. Goodman, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR).
Footnotes
- Received December 23, 1997.
- Accepted March 18, 1998.
-
Send reprint requests to: Daniel T. O’Connor, MD, Department of Medicine and Center for Molecular Genetics (9111H), University of California, San Diego, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA 92161. E-mail: doconnor{at}ucsd.edu
-
This work was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Institutes of Health, and the National Kidney Foundation.
Abbreviations
- CRE
- cAMP response element
- CREB
- cAMP response element binding protein
- RskII
- ribosomal protein S6 serine kinase II (pp90rsk, CREB kinase)
- Erk
- extracellular signal relay serine/threonine kinase
- MAP
- mitogen-activated protein
- MAPK
- mitogen-activated protein kinase
- bp
- base pair(s)
- MEK
- mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase
- Raf1
- serine/threonine kinase
- MEKK
- mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase
- Ras
- guanine nucleotide-binding/exchanging protooncogene product
- NGF
- nerve growth factor
- PMA
- phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate
- PAF
- platelet-activating factor
- TK
- thymidine kinase
- CAT
- chloramphenicol acetyltransferase
- The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics