Abstract
Increasing evidence points to the importance of local protein synthesis for axonal growth and responses to axotomy, yet there is little insight into the functions of individual locally synthesized proteins. We recently showed that expression of a reporter mRNA with the axonally localizing β-actin mRNA 3′UTR competes with endogenous β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs for binding to ZBP1 and axonal localization in adult sensory neurons (Donnelly et al., 2011). Here, we show that the 3′UTR of GAP-43 mRNA can deplete axons of endogenous β-actin mRNA. We took advantage of this 3′UTR competition to address the functions of axonally synthesized β-actin and GAP-43 proteins. In cultured rat neurons, increasing axonal synthesis of β-actin protein while decreasing axonal synthesis of GAP-43 protein resulted in short highly branched axons. Decreasing axonal synthesis of β-actin protein while increasing axonal synthesis of GAP-43 protein resulted in long axons with few branches. siRNA-mediated depletion of overall GAP-43 mRNA from dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) decreased the length of axons, while overall depletion of β-actin mRNA from DRGs decreased the number of axon branches. These deficits in axon growth could be rescued by transfecting with siRNA-resistant constructs encoding β-actin or GAP-43 proteins, but only if the mRNAs were targeted for axonal transport. Finally, in ovo electroporation of axonally targeted GAP-43 mRNA increased length and axonally targeted β-actin mRNA increased branching of sensory axons growing into the chick spinal cord. These studies indicate that axonal translation of β-actin mRNA supports axon branching and axonal translation of GAP-43 mRNA supports elongating growth.
Introduction
Polarized cells use mRNA localization to regulate protein content in their subcellular domains (Holt and Bullock, 2009). For neurons, where large distances separate the ends of axons and dendrites from their cell body, localized protein synthesis allows for rapid and autonomous responses to environmental stimuli. RNA profiling studies of neuronal processes have demonstrated hundreds to thousands of localized mRNAs (Willis et al., 2007; Taylor et al., 2009; Zivraj et al., 2010; Gumy et al., 2011; Cajigas et al., 2012). Extracellular stimuli specifically alter the mRNA populations of sensory axons and fibroblast's pseudopodia in vitro (Willis et al., 2007; Mili et al., 2008). The targeting of mRNAs to subcellular locales is a highly regulated process that affects a substantial portion of a cell's transcriptome. The function of proteins translated from subcellularly localized mRNAs remains unclear. Functional predictions have been based largely on gene ontology and network analyses, but experimental approaches are needed to distinguish functions of proteins synthesized from localized mRNAs versus those synthesized from the corresponding cell body localized mRNAs.
mRNA targeting with subsequent translational control can regulate where and when a new protein is introduced. Some mRNAs are selectively concentrated in presynaptic or postsynaptic compartments (Lyles et al., 2006; Andreassi et al., 2010). Spatial restriction of translation has functional implications. For example, myoinositol monophosphatase 1 mRNA is enriched in sympathetic axons, and blocking its subcellular localization causes axon degeneration (Andreassi et al., 2010). Axotomy-induced translation of axonal importin β1 mRNAs generates a retrograde signal for injury responses in the cell body (Hanz et al., 2003; Ben-Tov Perry et al., 2012). However, for β-actin, only a small fraction of the axonal protein is derived from local translation of its mRNA. The majority of axonal β-actin protein is derived from mRNA translated in the cell body (Eng et al., 1999; Donnelly et al., 2011). It is appealing to hypothesize that cell body synthesized and axonally synthesized proteins represent different functional pools of β-actin for the neuron. However, functional studies of the locally generated β-actin in developing axons have produced conflicting results (Leung et al., 2006; Yao et al., 2006; Roche et al., 2009; Sasaki et al., 2010; Cheever et al., 2011; Manns et al., 2012), and the question of what cellular mechanisms locally generated β-actin protein contribute to in the axon remains unresolved.
We recently showed that the protein products of mRNAs transported into axons by the RNA binding protein ZBP1, including β-actin mRNA, are needed for peripheral nerve regeneration (Donnelly et al., 2011). In this study, a GFP reporter mRNA with the 3′UTR of β-actin competed with endogenous β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs for axonal transport (Donnelly et al., 2011). Limited levels of ZBP1 in adult neurons are the basis of this competition. Here, we have exploited this 3′UTR competition to test for functions of the locally translated β-actin and GAP-43 proteins. We show that β-actin promotes branching of axons and GAP-43 promotes elongating growth of axons, but only when their mRNAs are targeted to axons for localized translation.
Materials and Methods
Rodent surgery and primary neuronal cultures.
For preparation of cultured dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons, L4–L5 DRGs of 175–200 g male Sprague Dawley rats were dissociated and cultured as described previously (Twiss et al., 2000). Dissociated ganglia were plated on glass coverslips or polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membranes that had been precoated with polylysine and laminin.
Dissociated neurons were transfected with plasmid constructs using the AMAXA Nucleofector and Small Cell Number kit (Lonza) with 2 μg of each DNA. In some experiments, DRGs were replated 2.5 d after transfection to analyze the initial stages of growth analogous to injury-conditioned DRG neurons. For this, dissociated DRG cultures were vigorously triturated in DMEM/F12 (Invitrogen), 10% fetal bovine serum (Gemini), and N1 supplement (Sigma) using a fire-polished Pasteur pipette, and then gently pelleted and replated in the same medium.
For fractionating axons, DRGs were cultured on PET membrane inserts with 3 μm diameter pores (BD Falcon) as described previously (Willis et al., 2007). After 20 h in culture, the axons were isolated; RNA was then isolated from the axonal compartment using an RNAqueous-Micro kit (Ambion). Axonal purity was tested by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR for β-actin, ErbB3, MAP2, GFAP, H1F0, and peripherin RNAs (see below) (Cox et al., 2008; Vuppalanchi et al., 2010).
DNA expression constructs.
mRNA segments for expression constructs were generated by RT-PCR using rat DRG RNA as a template. All cloned PCR products were full sequence validated before use. Sequences for PCR primers and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) probes (see below) are available on request. Myristoylated green fluorescent protein (GFPmyr) with the 3′UTR of rat γ-actin and β-actin have been described (Willis et al., 2007). Other 3′UTR constructs were based on this, with cDNAs cloned into Not1 and Xho1 restrictions sites immediately downstream of the GFPmyr.
Open reading frame (ORF) constructs were based on the published rat β-actin · mCherry fusion protein construct with the 3′UTRs of β-actin and γ-actin (β-actin · mCh-3′β-actin and β-actin · mCh-3′γ-actin, respectively) (Donnelly et al., 2011). Amplified GAP-43 ORF was initially cloned into pTOPO vector (Invitrogen). The rat GAP-43 ORF was then subcloned into BsrG1 and Not1 restriction sites of pβ-actin · mCh replacing the β-actin ORF. For generating ORF constructs with different 3′UTRs, PCR-amplified 3′UTRs were subcloned into BamH1 and Mfe1 restriction sites of the β-actin · mCh. Myc-tagged β-actin and GAP-43 ORFs were generated by PCR using primers including the myc tag and 3′ORF sequences.
Depletion of endogenous mRNAs. ON-TARGET siRNAs targeting the 3′UTRs of rat β-actin mRNA (NM 031144) and GAP-43 mRNA (NM 017195) were purchased from Dharmacon. A nontargeting siRNA sequence (siControl; Dharmacon) was used as a control. Cotransfection with siGlow (Dharmacon) was used to identify siRNA-transfected neurons. Four hours after plating, cultures were transfected with 300 nm siRNA to 3′UTR of β-actin or 400 nm siRNA to the 3′UTR of GAP43. The medium was changed after 24 h. After a total of 2.5 d in vitro, cultures were replated by trituration and allowed to re-extend processes for an additional 24 h before analysis of axonal length or RNA levels (see below). RT-PCR was used to determine the effectiveness of the siRNA treatment (see below).
In situ hybridization.
Quantitative FISH combined with immunofluorescence (IF) was used to detect axonal mRNAs and proteins in DRG cultures as described previously (Donnelly et al., 2011). Digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled oligonucleotide probes for β-actin and amphoterin mRNAs have been published (Willis et al., 2007). Quantification of FISH signals was performed using exposure, postprocessing matched digital images. Images were captured using a Zeiss Axioplan microscope fitted with a Hamamatsu ORCA-ER camera. Images were analyzed using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health; NIH). The following primary antibodies were used for immunodetection: sheep anti-DIG (1:100; Roche), chicken anti-neurofilament (NF) H (1:500; Millipore), chicken anti-NFM (1:500; Aves), and rabbit anti-peripherin (1:500; Millipore). Secondary antibodies were donkey anti-sheep-Cy5, donkey anti-chicken-FITC, and goat anti-rabbit-FITC (1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch). Negative controls for these FISH analyses consisted of scrambled DIG-labeled oligonucleotides; images for individual experiments were normalized to the negative control and reported as pixels/μm2 above this threshold level.
Immunoblotting.
Axons were isolated from transfected DRG cultures grown on porous membranes as above and then lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer. After normalization for protein content by Bradford assay, axonal proteins (15 μg) were fractionated on 10% SDS/PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membrane. Blots were then blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline plus 0.5% Tween 20 (TBST) for 1 h. Blots were then probed with mouse 91-E12 anti-GAP43 (1:50,000; Skene et al., 1986) or AC15 anti-β-actin (1:5000; Sigma) overnight at 4°C in blocking buffer. After washing, blots were probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse (1:1000; Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 1 h in blocking buffer; then washed in TBST and developed with ECLplus (GE Biosciences).
Analyses of axonal growth.
Axonal morphology was measured using green fluorescent protein (GFP) and immunostaining signals in transfected and/or immunostained DRG cultures as described previously (Donnelly et al., 2011). All analyses were performed by a blinded observer with images of neurons chosen based on expression of transfected reporter proteins and siRNAs. Mean axon length was obtained by measuring the longest axon per neuron using ImageJ (NIH). The number of branches was obtained by manually scoring GFP-positive processes ≥ 25 μm in length. For filopodia number, GFP-positive, NF + P-negative processes measuring at least one-half the axon diameter were manually scored for at least 30 different processes over at least three different culture preparations.
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
To determine the axonal localizing capability for the 3′UTR of amphoterin mRNA, dissociated DRG neurons were transfected with GFPmyr3′Amph constructs and then processed for fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) as described previously (Vuppalanchi et al., 2010). Briefly, the terminal axons of cells expressing GFPmyr3′Amph were photobleached with 100% power of 488 laser using Leica SP2 confocal microscope fitted with an environmental chamber maintained at 37°C, 5% CO2. The bleached region of interest (ROI) was then monitored for recovery by scanning with 488 nm laser (7% power) every 2 min for 30 min. Fluorescent intensity was normalized to prebleach levels for comparison across multiple experiments. Cultures were pretreated with 50 μm anisomycin to test for translational dependence of recovery.
In ovo expression of DNA constructs. In ovo electroporation at embryonic day (E) 3 was used for in vivo expression of β-actin · mCh and GAP43 · mCh constructs as previously described (Spillane et al., 2011). Briefly, early DRGs of chick embryos were electroporated at E3, and the embryos were harvested at E7. The spinal cord was acutely dissected from the embryos in its entirety from the first caudal rib, bisected, placed in an imaging dish, and then immediately imaged at either 20× or 100× (see Fig. 7A). This allowed us to resolve the extent of axon growth into the caudal spinal cord by DRG axons growing in the dorsal funiculi using a 20× objective with montage reconstructions, and the details of axonal and growth cone morphology using a 100× objective. Imaging was performed using an Orca ER camera (Hamamatsu) fitted to a Zeiss 200M microscope.
Statistical analyses.
All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism statistical software. Tests used are indicated in the appropriate figure legend. p values of ≤0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Results
GAP-43's 3′UTR competes with endogenous β-actin mRNA for axonal localization and attenuates axon outgrowth
GAP-43 mRNA has been detected in axons of multiple neuronal types (Willis et al., 2007; Taylor et al., 2009; Gumy et al., 2011). We previously showed that expression of a GFP reporter carrying the 3′UTR of rat β-actin mRNA competes with endogenous β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs for binding to ZBP1 and axonal transport (Donnelly et al., 2011). We reasoned that if this is truly a competition, then the 3′UTR of GAP-43 mRNA should similarly deplete axons of endogenous β-actin mRNA. To test this possibility, we generated a reporter construct carrying the localization element of GAP-43. DRG neurons expressing a diffusion-limited GFP construct (GFPmyr) carrying the 3′UTR of GAP-43 mRNA (GFPmyr3′GAP43) showed decreased levels of endogenous β-actin mRNA in their axons compared with neurons expressing an empty GFP reporter or a nonlocalizing GFPmyr3′γ-actin reporter (Fig. 1A,B). These data indicate that the 3′UTR of GAP-43 mRNA can compete with endogenous β-actin mRNA for localization into axons.
Increasing axonal targeting of β-actin and GAP-43 coding sequence mRNAs alters axonal outgrowth
DRG neurons cultured after an in vivo peripheral axotomy show long, unbranched axons over the first 24 h in culture compared with neurons from uninjured animals that show short, highly branched axons. Smith and Skene (1997) referred to these morphologies as “elongating” and “arborizing” growth, respectively. Since both GAP-43 and β-actin mRNAs localize to axons and the 3′UTRs appear to compete for transport into axons, we asked whether the proteins encoded by these axonal transcripts might contribute to these different growth morphologies. We reasoned that targeting the ORFs of β-actin versus GAP-43 mRNAs into axons in the absence of their UTR competition would allow us to effectively analyze local functions of their encoded proteins. For this, we used the 3′UTR of amphoterin mRNA to target the β-actin and GAP-43 ORFs into axons, since our previous studies indicated that axonal amphoterin mRNA levels are not altered by depletion or overexpression of ZBP1 (Donnelly et al., 2011). DRG neurons transfected with GFPmyr containing the 3′UTR of amphoterin (GFPmyr3′Amph) showed brisk GFP fluorescence in terminal axons (Fig. 2A). After photobleaching, the GFP signals in distal axons showed a slow but translation-dependent recovery consistent with localized translation (Fig. 2A,B). FISH analyses also showed axonal localization of GFPmyr3′Amph mRNA (data not shown). Thus, the 3′UTR of amphoterin is sufficient for axonal mRNA targeting. Consistent with this, studies below show that amphoterin's 3′UTR can drive the ORFs of GAP-43 and β-actin mRNAs into axons both in vitro and in vivo (see below).
Since it is clear that both β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs localize into axons, the axon can draw from two sources for β-actin and GAP-43 proteins: axonal transport of proteins generated by translation of their mRNAs in the cell body, and intra-axonal translation of their localized mRNAs. To determine whether axonally generated β-actin or GAP-43 proteins could alter axonal growth, we generated β-actin · mCherry and GAP-43 · mCherry fusion protein constructs containing the axonally localizing amphoterin 3′UTR (β-actin · mCh-3′Amph and GAP43 · mCh-3′Amph, respectively) or cell body-restricted γ-actin 3′UTR (β-actin · mCh-3′γ-actin and GAP43 · mCh-3′γ-actin, respectively). Both β-actin · mCh-3′Amph and β-actin · mCh-3′γ-actin transfected neurons showed mCherry fluorescence in growth cones (Fig. 3E). Filamentous structures could be seen in growth cones and Schwann cells with both β-actin · mCh expression constructs (Fig. 3E,F). The mCherry fluorescence for the GAP43 · mCh-3′Amph and GAP43 · mCh-3′γ-actin transfected DRGs was also concentrated in growth cones (Fig. 4E). Thus, these mCherry fusion proteins showed the anticipated subcellular localization in the transfected DRG cultures.
DRGs transfected with the axonally localizing β-actin · mCh-3′β-actin or β-actin · mCh-3′Amph showed an increase in axon branch and filopodia numbers but not in axon length compared with mCherry and cell body-restricted β-actin · mCh-3′γ-actin transfected neurons (Fig. 3A–D). DRG neurons transfected with the axonally localizing GAP43 · mCh-3′GAP43 or GAP43 · mCh-3′Amph increased axon length but not branching or filopodia compared with neurons expressing the mCherry or the cell body-restricted GAP43 · mCh-3′γ-actin (Fig. 4A,C). Expression of the GAP43 · mCh-3′GAP43 significantly reduced axon branching and filopodia number, but there was no significant effect on these parameters in the GAP43 · mCh-3′Amph-expressing neurons. Neurons expressing the cell body-restricted GAP43 · mCh-3′γ-actin did show a small increase in axon length over the mCherry transfected neurons, but this did not reach statistical significance in our studies (Fig. 4B). This small increase is consistent with analyses of neurons cultured from GAP-43 transgenic mice that similarly did not include the 3′UTR of GAP-43 in the transgene (Bomze et al., 2001).
Immunoblotting of axonal lysates prepared from the transfected DRG cultures showed a clear increase in GAP43 · mCh protein in axons of the GAP43 · mCh-3′Amph-transfected cultures compared with the GAP43 · mCh-3′γ-actin-transfected cultures (Fig. 4F). We could not detect the transfected β-actin · mCh in these lysates by immunoblotting using anti-β-actin antibodies. Attempts to visualize the β-actin · mCh in these lysates resulted in severe overexposure of the endogenous axonal β-actin protein bands that obscured any nearby bands (data not shown). This would be entirely consistent with previous work from Roche et al. (2009) showing that locally translated β-actin does not influence the overall pool of β-actin in axons. Still, the lack of detectable increase in axonal β-actin · mCh with axonal targeting raised concerns about the mechanisms of the altered axonal growth with this construct. Although amphoterin is not transported by ZBP1 (Donnelly et al., 2011), it was possible that introducing the 3′UTR of amphoterin mRNA in these constructs could alter axon growth through other mechanisms. Indeed, quantitative FISH analyses showed depletion of endogenous amphoterin mRNA from axons of neurons transfected with constructs carrying the 3′UTR of amphoterin (Fig. 5A,B). However, there was no significant change in axon length or branching with expression of the mCh-3′Amph in the DRG neurons compared with control and mCh-3′γ-actin-transfected DRGs (Fig. 5C,D).
As a further test for potential effects of the exogenous amphoterin 3′UTR on axonal growth, we generated axonally targeted versus cell body-restricted β-actin · mCh and GAP43 · mCh expression constructs with naturally occurring Stat3α 3′UTR variants (β-actin · mCh-3′Stat3long, β-actin · mCh-3′Stat3short, GAP43 · mCh-3′Stat3long, and GAP43 · mCh-3′Stat3short, respectively). Differential polyadenylation element usage in Stat3α gene in DRGs results in a cell body-restricted Stat3α mRNA with a “short” 3′UTR and an axonally targeted Stat3α mRNA with a “long” 3′UTR (Ben-Yaakov et al., 2012). GAP43 · mCh-3′Stat3long-transfected DRGs showed increased axon length and the GAP43 · mCh-3′Stat3short-transfected DRGs showed no significant differences in axon length compared with control cultures (Fig. 6A–C). Similarly, the β-actin · mCh-3′Stat3long-transfected DRGs showed increased axon branching and filopodia, but there was no significant change in branching with β-actin · mCh-3′Stat3short transfection compared with mCherry-transfected DRGs (Fig. 6A,B,D,E). Although we cannot exclude that introduction of the 3′Stat3αlong constructs alters transport of Stat3α and other mRNAs, just as we see with the 3′Amph constructs in Figure 5, the only difference between the axonally targeted β-actin · mCh and GAP43 · mCh mRNAs under these conditions is the ORF RNA sequence. Thus, our data indicate that the ORF mRNA sequences or encoded proteins of the axonally targeted β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs account for the differential changes in axon outgrowth seen with the mCherry fusion constructs rather than any indirect effects of the axonally targeting 3′UTRs used here.
Although the β-actin · mCh and GAP43 · mCh proteins both accumulated in growth cones, it was possible that the fusion proteins introduced additional functions to these ORFs. To address this possibility, we generated myc-tagged versions of the β-actin and GAP-43 ORF constructs (β-actinmyc3′Amph and GAP43myc3′Amph, respectively), reasoning that the much smaller myc tag would be much less likely to hinder β-actin and GAP-43 function than the mCherry polypeptide. Transfection with axonally targeted β-actinmyc3′Amph increased axonal branching but not axon length (average branches/distal 200 μm axon, 2.7 ± 0.40 for β-actinmyc3′Amph vs 1.34 ± 0.33 for control, p ≤ 0.01 by students t test; average axon length, 401.2 ± 28.1 μm for β-actinmyc3′Amph vs 425.7 ± 33.8 μm for control, p > 0.5 student's t test). The axonally targeted GAP43myc3′Amph increased axon length but had no effect on axon branch numbers (average axon length, 665.8 ± 61.4 μm for GAP43myc3′Amph vs 425.7 ± 33.8 μm for control, p ≤ 0.001 by student's t test; average branches/distal 200 μm axon, 1.56 ± 0.35 for GAP43myc3′Amph vs 1.34 ± 0.33 for control, p > 0.5 by students t test). Thus, the changes in axonal morphology seen with the axonally targeted ORF constructs would be consistent with the introduction of additional GAP-43 and β-actin proteins into the axons rather than unique effects of the ORF · mCh fusion proteins or targeting 3′UTRs.
Axonally targeted β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs can differentially rescue growth deficits from competing UTRs
Depleting endogenous mRNAs from axons through the expression of GFPmyr3′β-actin or GFPmyr3′GAP43 mRNA decreases both the length and branching of axons (Donnelly et al., 2011). Thus, we asked whether the β-actin or GAP-43 ORF constructs targeted to axons through the 3′UTR of amphoterin mRNA could rescue these growth deficits seen with expression of GFPmyr3′β-actin or GFPmyr3′GAP-43 (Fig. 7A). Neurons cotransfected with GFPmyr3′β-actin plus cell body-restricted β-actin · mCh-3′γ-actin showed decreased axon length and branching compared to those transfected with GFPmyr3′γ-actin plus β-actin · mCh-3′γ-actin (Fig. 7B). Cotransfecting with axonally localizing β-actin · mCh-3′Amph rescued the axon branching deficit in GFPmyr3′β-actin-expressing neurons but had no significant effect on axon length; β-actin · mCh-3′Amph also increased axon branching in the GFPmyr3′γ-actin-expressing neurons (Fig. 7B). The nonlocalizing β-actin · mCh-3′γ-actin did not significantly affect axon length or branching in the GFPmyr3′β-actin-expressing cultures (Fig. 7B). These data indicate that the axonally generated β-actin protein contributes to arborizing axon growth rather than the elongating axon growth that Smith and Skene (1997) showed is characteristic of injury-conditioned neurons.
We next asked whether cotransfecting GAP43 · mCh-3′Amph might rescue axonal growth deficits in neurons expressing GFPmyr3′GAP43. Neurons cotransfected with GFPmyr3′GAP43 plus control cell body-restricted GAP43 · mCh-3′γ-actin showed decreased axon length compared to those transfected with GFPmyr3′γ-actin plus GAP43 · mCh-3′γ-actin (Fig. 7C). Cotransfecting with the axonally localizing GAP43 · mCh-3′Amph fully rescued axon length deficit in the GFPmyr3′GAP43-expressing neurons but had no significant effect on axon branching; GAP43 · mCh-3′Amph also significantly increased axon length in the GFPmyr3′γ-actin-expressing neurons (Fig. 7C). Thus, consistent with the overexpression of axonally targeted ORFs above, the axonally generated GAP-43 protein appears to support elongating axonal growth rather than the arborizing growth that Smith and Skene (1997) showed is characteristic of naive DRG neurons. In contrast to Figure 1A, we did not see a significant change in branch number when the GAP43 · mCh constructs were cotransfected into GFPmyr3′GAP43-expressing neurons. The reason for this discrepancy is not clear.
Axonally localizing β-actin and GAP-43 ORFs rescue axonal growth deficits seen with knockdown of endogenous β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs
Since the axonally targeted β-actin and GAP-43 ORFs rescued growth deficits in neurons depleted of axonal β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs, we asked whether they might also rescue potential growth deficits seen with overall depletion of β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs. For this, we cotransfected neurons with siRNAs targeting 3′UTR of β-actin or GAP-43 mRNAs and axonally targeted or cell body-restricted β-actin or GAP-43 ORF constructs (Fig. 8A). The 3′UTR targeted siRNAs showed ∼70% depletion of endogenous β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs (Fig. 8B). Depletion of β-actin mRNA decreased axonal branching but did not affect axon length (Fig. 8C). This deficit in branching was rescued by cotransfection with the axonally localizing β-actin · mCh-3′Amph but not the cell body-restricted β-actin · mCh-3′γ-actin constructs (Fig. 8C).
DRG cultures depleted of GAP-43 mRNA showed overall shorter axons (Fig. 8D). This axon length deficit was fully rescued by cotransfection with the axonally localizing GAP43 · mCh-3′Amph but not the cell body-restricted GAP43 · mCh-3′γ-actin constructs (Fig. 8D). Both the siRNA knockdown of endogenous β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs and the rescue experiments are consistent with the axonally synthesized β-actin protein supporting the arborizing growth of axons and the axonally synthesized GAP-43 protein supporting the elongating growth of axons.
Effects of in vivo over expression of axonally targeted β-actin and GAP-43
To determine whether the effects of mRNAs targeted into axons using the amphoterin 3′UTR observed in vitro would be recapitulated in vivo, we took advantage of a recently developed system for in ovo gene expression in embryonic chicken DRG neurons (Fig. 9A) (Spillane et al., 2011). Four days after the in ovo electroporation at E3, DRG axons are the only structures expressing fluorescent reporters in the caudal portions of spinal cord. We have recently shown that GFPmyr mRNA targeted into DRG axons in ovo using the 3′UTR of β-actin is locally translated in the embryonic spinal cord (Spillane et al., 2012). DRG expression of axonally targeted β-actin · mCh-3′Amph increased the number of axonal filopodia relative to both axonally targeted mCh-3′Amph and cell body-restricted β-actin · mCh-3′γ-actin (Fig. 9B,C). Similarly, expression of β-actin · mCh-3′Amph also increased the number of axons exhibiting one or more branches and mean number of branches per axon (Fig. 9D,E). Expression of axonally targeted GAP43 · mCh-3′Amph increased the distance that the front of axons extended into the caudal spinal cord relative to the axonally targeted mCh-3′Amph and cell body-restricted GAP43 · mCh-3′γ-actin (Fig. 9F). Expression of axonally targeted GAP43 · mCh-3′Amph did not alter the number of axonal filopodia (data not shown) or the number of branches per axon (data not shown). These results indicate that in the context of the developing chick spinal cord, axonally synthesized β-actin protein increases branching of axons and axonally synthesized GAP-43 protein increases axon elongation similar to what we observed in vitro using adult rat DRG neurons.
Discussion
Peripheral nerve injury triggers a shift in neuronal gene expression programs, turning on expression of genes needed for axon regeneration and turning off expression of genes needed for neuronal function and maintenance (Hoffman, 2010). This shift in gene expression contributes to the rapid, elongating axonal growth that is seen when injury-conditioned neurons are placed in culture (Smith and Skene, 1997), and recent work indicates that signals retrogradely transported from the axon in vivo likely drive this change in gene expression after axotomy (Michaelevski et al., 2010; Ben-Yaakov et al., 2012; Ben-Tov Perry et al., 2012). The robust increase in intra-axonal protein synthesis seen in neurons cultured from injury-conditioned animals (Willis et al., 2005) suggests that localized protein synthesis also contributes to the rapid axonal outgrowth of conditioned neurons. Although we recently showed that axonal transport of ZBP1 cargo mRNAs, including β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs, contribute to peripheral nervous system axon regeneration (Donnelly et al., 2011), there have been no data directly linking axonal growth to the functions of individual axonally synthesized proteins. The data presented here show that axonally synthesized β-actin increases filopodia formation and branching of axons and the axonally synthesized GAP-43 protein increases axon length. These phenotypic changes with overexpression of axonally targeted β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs are seen both in cultured rat DRG neurons and in chick DRG neurons in the developing spinal cord in vivo. Filopodia are cellular protrusions strictly dependent on actin filaments enriched in β-actin protein. The formation of axonal filopodia is the first step in axon branching (Gallo, 2011) and signals that promote formation of axonal filopodia also promote axon branching (Ketschek and Gallo, 2010). Nerve growth factor induces axonal protein synthesis-dependent axon branching from embryonic chick DRG axons, and the intra-axonal translation of mRNAs for the actin regulatory proteins Arp 2, cortactin, and WAVE1 has been linked to filopodia and branch formation (Spillane et al., 2012). While it remains to be addressed how axonally synthesized β-actin contributes to the formation of filopodia, the finding that axonally synthesized β-actin promotes formation of filopodia and branches reveals a specific role for the axonal synthesis of β-actin.
Several studies in developing neurons indicate that translation of axonal β-actin mRNA is important for growth cone guidance and motility (Zhang et al., 2001; Zheng et al., 2001; Leung et al., 2006; Sasaki et al., 2010). Additionally, work in fibroblasts has shown that localized synthesis of β-actin is needed for directional motility (Shestakova et al., 2001). However, Roche et al. (2009) questioned the role of axonally synthesized β-actin, since they saw no effects on growth of developing axons when axonal translation was blocked. Moreover, mice with a motor neuron-specific knock-out of the β-actin gene showed normal developmental and regenerative growth of axons (Cheever et al., 2011). Subsequent deletion of β-actin gene in cortical neurons showed altered axonal growth in the corpus callosum, but no abnormalities in axonal growth of cultured neurons. However, there was a compensatory increase in expression of other actin genes in these mice (Cheever et al., 2012). Though γ-actin apparently does not localize, potential localization of other actin mRNAs was not addressed in these knock-out mice. Moreover, the above studies did not attempt to introduce more of the localizing β-actin mRNA as we have done here. Expression of the β-actin · mCh-3′Amph clearly increased branching of axons, both in cultured adult DRG neurons and in developing DRG axons extending in the spinal cord. The growth deficits seen with overall depletion of β-actin mRNA and selective depletion of axonal β-actin mRNA were also rescued by the β-actin · mCh construct, but only when the mRNA was targeted to axons. These studies emphasize that axonally generated β-actin alters axon growth both in cultured neurons and in vivo. It should be noted that Roche et al. (2009) only analyzed growth cone motility and not branching of axons. Similarly, although the study by Cheever et al. (2011) qualitatively did not find overbranching of motoneuron axons as a possible consequence of guidance defects, these authors did not report quantitative analysis of axon branching and there does appear to be decreased branching in their published images (Cheever et al., 2011, their Fig. 3.). It will thus be of interest to revisit those β-actin knock-out mice in future studies and determine whether there are deficits in the branching of motoneuron axons.
The axonal translation of GAP-43 mRNA appears to contribute to elongating axonal growth as injury-conditioned neurons exhibit. Although GAP-43 has long been heralded as a “growth-associated protein” based on its induction during periods of axonal growth and enrichment in growth cones (Benowitz and Routtenberg, 1997), the exact function of GAP-43 is not clear. GAP-43−/− mice showed altered axonal pathfinding arguing that the GAP43 protein has a functional role in the growth of axons (Strittmatter et al., 1995; Kruger et al., 1998; Maier et al., 1999). Nonetheless, rescue experiments that include the axonally localizing GAP-43 mRNA as we performed here were not attempted. It is possible that loss of the GAP-43 gene could alter transport of other mRNAs into axons and contribute to the phenotype of GAP-43−/− animals. Transgenic overexpression of GAP-43 caused only modest effects on axon growth from DRG neurons and did not support regeneration in the CNS leading to the conclusion that GAP-43 is not sufficient to enhance growth on its own (Bomze et al., 2001). However, the 3′UTR that we show drives localization of GAP-43 mRNA was not included in the transgene for these GAP-43 overexpressing animals. We similarly see only modest effects when overexpressing GAP-43, unless the mRNA is targeted into the axons. In our hands, the axonally targeted GAP-43 mRNA rescued the axonal growth deficits seen both with overall depletion of GAP-43 mRNA and with selective depletion of GAP-43 mRNA from axons. We have used two different axonal targeting RNA motifs to show that axonally generated GAP-43 enhances axonal growth. Though we cannot completely exclude the possibility that this axonally targeted GAP-43 mRNA alters transport of other mRNAs into axons, our data suggest that GAP-43 is sufficient to increase axonal outgrowth on its own if the protein is locally synthesized in axons. Considering that GAP-43 mRNA competes with β-actin for localization, it is intriguing to speculate that increase in axonal transport of β-actin mRNA might contribute to some of the axonal growth deficits seen in GAP-43−/− mice. Indeed, Maier et al. (1999) showed altered axon growth into barrel cortex in the GAP-43−/− mice with irregular clustering of thalamocortical afferents (Maier et al., 1999).
Interestingly, expressing GFPmyr with the 3′UTR of GAP-43 mRNA does not deplete axons of β-actin mRNA to the same extent as the GFPmyr3′β-actin depletes axons of endogenous β-actin mRNA. Indeed, the depletion of axonal β-actin mRNA by GFPmyr3′GAP43 was comparable to the axonal GAP-43 mRNA depletion that we previously saw with expression of GFPmyr3′β-actin (Donnelly et al., 2011). This suggests that GAP-43 mRNA and β-actin mRNA have different affinities for binding to ZBP1, which could impact the extent to which GAP-43 mRNA can localize into axons following injury. Phosphorylation of ZBP1 decreases its affinity for binding to mRNA (Hüttelmaier et al., 2005), and ZBP1 can clearly bind to many different mRNAs (Jønson et al., 2007). However, ZBP1's affinity for binding to different mRNAs has not been tested. The relative affinities for ZBP1 binding would clearly be a determinant in how much a given mRNA can localize subcellularly and the effect that altered levels of that transcript could have upon other transported mRNAs. This could contribute to the variability in branching deficits seen with introduction of the GFPmyr3′GAP43 construct seen in Figure 7. Interactions with other proteins associated with mRNA-protein complexes could also alter the relative affinity for ZBP1 binding to GAP-43 and β-actin mRNAs. The Elav protein HuD binds to an adenine-rich element in GAP-43's 3′UTR (Chung et al., 1997; Mobarak et al., 2000). Based on mRNA coimmunoprecipitation assays, HuD can also bind to many different transcripts (Bolognani et al., 2010), and HuD and the human ortholog of ZBP1, IMP1, have been copurified with the RNA localization element of Tau mRNA (Atlas et al., 2004). Thus, there is precedent for such a complex of RNA binding proteins, but it is not clear if this occurs with β-actin or GAP-43 mRNAs. Nonetheless, recent work from the Sahin lab has linked HuD to axonal transport of Neuritin/cpg15 mRNA in cortical neurons (Akten et al., 2011). Future work will be needed to determine the exact composition of RNA-protein complexes transporting β-actin and GAP-43 mRNA into axons.
In conclusion, this work indicates that the axonal translation of β-actin and GAP-43 mRNAs have differential roles in the development of axonal morphogenesis. The use of disparate 3′UTRs (e.g., Amph and Stat3αlong) to target and drive the axonal translation of mRNAs of interest represents a novel strategy for the analysis of the functions of axonal translation. In the future, it will be of interest to determine the roles of axonally targeted ORFs, using this approach, in axon regeneration.
Footnotes
- Received April 7, 2012.
- Revision received November 10, 2012.
- Accepted December 10, 2012.
This work was supported by grants from National Institutes of Health (R01-NS041596 to J.L.T. and R01-NS048090 to G.G.), Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, and the Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Foundation. C.J.D. was supported by a graduate fellowship from the University of Delaware over a portion of these studies. Antibody to GAP-43 was kindly provided by J.H. Pate Skene, Duke University.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Jeffrey L. Twiss, Department of Biology, Drexel University, 3245 Chestnut Street, PISB Room 123, Philadelphia, PA 19104. jeff.twiss{at}drexel.edu
- Copyright © 2013 the authors 0270-6474/13/333311-12$15.00/0