Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
Erratum

Erratum: de la Vega et al., “Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of Human Medial Frontal Cortex Reveals Tripartite Functional Organization”

Journal of Neuroscience 29 March 2017, 37 (13) 3735; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0471-17.2017

In the article “Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of Human Medial Frontal Cortex Reveals Tripartite Functional Organization” by Alejandro de la Vega, Luke J. Chang, Marie T. Banich, Tor D. Wager, and Tal Yarkoni, which appeared on pages 6553–6562 of the June 15, 2016 issue, three typographical errors were made in the typesetting stage. Any instances of “0-cluster” should read as “9-cluster.” In particular, “… subregions in the 0-cluster solution were given alphanumeric labels …” should read as “… subregions in the 9-cluster solution were given alphanumeric labels.”; “For the 0-cluster solution, we contrasted the coactivation of each cluster …” should read as “For the 9-cluster solution, we contrasted the coactivation of each cluster …”; and “The 0-cluster solution revealed …” should read as “The 9-cluster solution revealed …” These corrections do not affect the conclusions of the paper.

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.